Fiona Jones1, Elizabeth Livingstone, Louise Hawkes. 1. Faculty of Health and Social Care Science, St. George's University of London & Kingston University, UK. f.jones@sgul.kingston.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This paper presents findings from a study which aimed to explore contextual, personal and professional factors in applying training in the use of a new stroke self-management programme. METHODS: Practitioners completed in-depth case reflections as part of their two-day training in the Bridges stroke self-management programme (SSMP). The study utilized a qualitative approach to explore the understanding and meaning participants gave to their experiences of using the SSMP. Data from case reflections were analysed using a thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Data from 60 case reflections were included in the analysis. Several themes were prominent including: timing, belief in the concept of self-management, congruence with goal setting, balance of power and subtleties and sensitivities of using the SSMP. The use of in-depth case reflections enabled a personal awareness of the complexities of supporting self-management after stroke. Participants reflected on their communication styles and interactions and how they influence the development of self-management skills in individuals post-stroke. CONCLUSION: Case reflections offered an opportunity for participants who had received training in the use of an SSMP to explore their experiences of using the programme with individuals post-stroke. This enabled personal reflection on learning and facilitated a wider discussion on the professional and organizational context concerning integration of a self-management programme into stroke rehabilitation. The paradox between professionals having a role as 'experts' and the subtle changes in practice towards a more collaborative therapeutic relationship to support self-management needs further exploration. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: Physiotherapists were required to make a change in their practice from traditional, educational, hands on approaches to one which gave more prominence to facilitating an individual's problem solving, collaborative goal setting and decision-making post-stroke. This study highlights a number of issues relevant to professional learning and education in respect of self-management.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This paper presents findings from a study which aimed to explore contextual, personal and professional factors in applying training in the use of a new stroke self-management programme. METHODS: Practitioners completed in-depth case reflections as part of their two-day training in the Bridges stroke self-management programme (SSMP). The study utilized a qualitative approach to explore the understanding and meaning participants gave to their experiences of using the SSMP. Data from case reflections were analysed using a thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Data from 60 case reflections were included in the analysis. Several themes were prominent including: timing, belief in the concept of self-management, congruence with goal setting, balance of power and subtleties and sensitivities of using the SSMP. The use of in-depth case reflections enabled a personal awareness of the complexities of supporting self-management after stroke. Participants reflected on their communication styles and interactions and how they influence the development of self-management skills in individuals post-stroke. CONCLUSION: Case reflections offered an opportunity for participants who had received training in the use of an SSMP to explore their experiences of using the programme with individuals post-stroke. This enabled personal reflection on learning and facilitated a wider discussion on the professional and organizational context concerning integration of a self-management programme into stroke rehabilitation. The paradox between professionals having a role as 'experts' and the subtle changes in practice towards a more collaborative therapeutic relationship to support self-management needs further exploration. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: Physiotherapists were required to make a change in their practice from traditional, educational, hands on approaches to one which gave more prominence to facilitating an individual's problem solving, collaborative goal setting and decision-making post-stroke. This study highlights a number of issues relevant to professional learning and education in respect of self-management.
Authors: Emma Boger; Jaimie Ellis; Sue Latter; Claire Foster; Anne Kennedy; Fiona Jones; Vicky Fenerty; Ian Kellar; Sara Demain Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-07-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Leon Poltawski; Charles Abraham; Anne Forster; Victoria A Goodwin; Cherry Kilbride; Rod S Taylor; Sarah Dean Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2013-10-01 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Ton Satink; Staffan Josephsson; Jana Zajec; Edith H C Cup; Bert J M de Swart; Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 2.474