Literature DB >> 22767210

Prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic (transabdominal preperitoneal-TAPP) versus open (mesh) repair for bilateral and recurrent inguinal hernia: incidence of chronic groin pain and impact on quality of life: results of 10 year follow-up.

M Bignell1, G Partridge, D Mahon, M Rhodes.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The incidence of chronic groin pain (CGP) and its impact on quality of life (QoL) after hernia repair are not clear with follow-up either being short or retrospective. We present 10-year prospective follow-up of a randomized trial for bilateral and recurrent hernia repair focusing on CGP and its impact on QoL.
METHODS: Patients enrolled between 1997 and 2000 were contacted by telephone and asked about the presence of CGP. Those patients with CGP were sent two validated questionnaires: a SF-12v2 Health Survey and a Pain Impact Questionnaire (PIQ-6) (QualityMetric, USA).
RESULTS: One hundred and twenty patients were recruited into the original study, and of these, 14 complained of CGP and were sent a PIQ-6 and a SF-12 v2 health survey. Overall, there was a higher incidence of CGP in the laparoscopic group compared with the open group (15 vs. 8 %, ns), but the severity of the pain in the laparoscopic group was less (2 vs. 3.5, p = 0.0558). QoL was significantly reduced in patients with CGP compared with the US norm. The laparoscopic group scored higher in 5 out of 8 of the QoL categories compared with the open group, but this was not significant. Overall age-adjusted scores revealed those under 65 years of age felt they had poorer physical health, and this reduced their QoL compared to normal values.
CONCLUSION: CGP following laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair is less severe than open repair, but this does not translate into a significant improvement in QoLin this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22767210     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-012-0940-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  12 in total

1.  Laparoscopic (TEP) versus Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair: a comparison of quality-of-life outcomes.

Authors:  Eddie Myers; Katherine M Browne; Dara O Kavanagh; Michael Hurley
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Quality of life in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  K Lawrence; D McWhinnie; C Jenkinson; A Coulter
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Outcome of patients with severe chronic pain following repair of groin hernia.

Authors:  C A Courtney; K Duffy; M G Serpell; P J O'Dwyer
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Comparison of endoscopic techniques vs Shouldice and other open nonmesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  R Bittner; S Sauerland; C-G Schmedt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-28       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Five-year follow-up of a randomized trial to assess pain and numbness after laparoscopic or open repair of groin hernia.

Authors:  A M Grant; N W Scott; P J O'Dwyer
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  C G Schmedt; S Sauerland; R Bittner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Quality of life analysis after open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair--retrospective study.

Authors:  Darko Srsen; Nikica Druzijanić; Zenon Pogorelić; Zdravko Perko; Josko Juricić; Damir Kraljević; Dragan Krnić; Kanito Bilan; Zeljko Mimica
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec

8.  Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for inguinal hernia: outcome and cost.

Authors:  J Wellwood; M J Sculpher; D Stoker; G J Nicholls; C Geddes; A Whitehead; R Singh; D Spiegelhalter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-07-11

9.  Long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of Shouldice, Lichtenstein and transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repairs.

Authors:  M Butters; J Redecke; J Köninger
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Recurrent inguinal hernia: randomized multicenter trial comparing laparoscopic and Lichtenstein repair.

Authors:  A Eklund; C Rudberg; C-E Leijonmarck; I Rasmussen; L Spangen; G Wickbom; U Wingren; A Montgomery
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 3.453

View more
  19 in total

1.  Laparoscopic transabdominal inguinal hernia repair in community hospital settings: a general surgeon's last 10 years experience.

Authors:  F Agresta; M Torchiaro; C Tordin
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Mechanisms of age and race differences in receiving minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Joceline V Vu; Vidhya Gunaseelan; Justin B Dimick; Michael J Englesbe; Darrell A Campbell; Dana A Telem
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Does peritoneal flap closure technique following transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair make a difference in postoperative pain? A long-term quality of life comparison.

Authors:  Samuel W Ross; Steven A Groene; Tanu Prasad; Amy E Lincourt; Kent W Kercher; Vedra A Augenstein; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  A prospective randomized comparison of testicular functions, sexual functions and quality of life following laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal (TEP) and trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repairs.

Authors:  Virinder Kumar Bansal; Asuri Krishna; Pratik Manek; Subodh Kumar; Omprakash Prajapati; Rajeshwari Subramaniam; Anand Kumar; Atin Kumar; Rajesh Sagar; M C Misra
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Randomized trial comparing self gripping semi re-absorbable mesh (PROGRIP) with polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernioplasty: the 6 years result.

Authors:  J K M Fan; J Yip; D C C Foo; O S H Lo; W L Law
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-11-26       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Surgeon utilization of minimally invasive techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a population-based study.

Authors:  Joceline V Vu; Vidhya Gunaseelan; Greta L Krapohl; Michael J Englesbe; Darrell A Campbell; Justin B Dimick; Dana A Telem
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Patient's satisfaction at 2 years after groin hernia repair: any difference according to the technique?

Authors:  B Romain; J-F Gillion; P Ortega-Deballon; N Meyer
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 8.  Uniformity of Chronic Pain Assessment after Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Critical Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Marijke Molegraaf; Johan Lange; Arthur Wijsmuller
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 1.745

Review 9.  Meta-analysis and review of prospective randomized trials comparing laparoscopic and Lichtenstein techniques in recurrent inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  A Pisanu; M Podda; A Saba; G Porceddu; A Uccheddu
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in a Developing Nation: Short-term Outcomes in 103 Consecutive Procedures.

Authors:  Shamir O Cawich; Sanjib K Mohanty; Kimon O Bonadie; Lindberg K Simpson; Peter B Johnson; Sundeep Shah; Eric W Williams
Journal:  J Surg Tech Case Rep       Date:  2013-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.