Literature DB >> 22766911

Histogram analysis of renal arterial spin labeling perfusion data reveals differences between volunteers and patients with mild chronic kidney disease.

Cristina Rossi1, Ferruh Artunc, Petros Martirosian, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, Fritz Schick, Andreas Boss.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The spatial heterogeneity of renal perfusion data was analyzed with arterial spin labeling (ASL) data sets in a cohort of subjects with moderately impaired kidney function (ie, glomerular filtration rate >30 mL/min/1.73 m) versus a cohort of healthy volunteers. The potential diagnostic value of a detailed histogram analysis of such perfusion data for detection of mild renal dysfunction was investigated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight healthy volunteers and 9 patients with mild renal dysfunction (chronic kidney disease stages 1-3) were included in the study. All subjects underwent ASL perfusion measurements with a 1.5-T magnetic resonance scanner using a flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery labeling scheme with true fast imaging in steady-state precession data readout. Quantitative perfusion maps were generated using extended Bloch equations. Histogram analysis was performed to quantify the metrics of the perfusion of the renal cortex and the entire parenchyma, respectively. Mean perfusion value (μ), SD of the mean value (σ), peak height (PH), peak position (PP), skewness (s), and kurtosis (k) were computed to describe the distribution of the perfusion values.
RESULTS: A significant difference was found in the mean perfusion values computed for the cortex and the parenchyma between healthy volunteers (cortex, 329 ± 53 mL/100 g/min; parenchyma, 301 ± 51 mL/100 g/min) and patients (cortex, 263 ± 81 mL/100 g/min; parenchyma, 244 ± 77 mL/100 g/min). The histogram analysis of the cortical perfusion values also showed a significant difference (P < 0.05) in the main histogram measures between healthy volunteers (PP = 368 ± 65 mL/100 g/min; s = -0.543 ± 0.298; k = 0.371 ± 0.590) and patients (PP = 237 ± 115 mL/100 g/min; s = -0.125 ± 0.581; k = -0.151 ± 0.561).
CONCLUSION: Moderate renal dysfunction is associated with a significant change in the distribution of cortical perfusion values and a reduction of blood perfusion for both the parenchyma and the cortex. The preliminary results reported in this study suggest the importance of a regional assessment of renal perfusion. Histogram analysis of ASL data may help to detect chronic kidney disorders and to monitor their progression in a clinical setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22766911     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318257063a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  22 in total

1.  Using intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging to study the renal pathophysiological process of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in rats: Comparison with conventional DWI and arterial spin labelling.

Authors:  Long Liang; Wen-Bo Chen; Kannie W Y Chan; Yu-Guo Li; Bin Zhang; Chang-Hong Liang; Guan-Shu Liu; Shui-Xing Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: A promising method for renal microvascular perfusion evaluation.

Authors:  Ling Wang; Chandra Mohan
Journal:  J Transl Int Med       Date:  2016-09-23

3.  Renal Perfusion during Hemodialysis: Intradialytic Blood Flow Decline and Effects of Dialysate Cooling.

Authors:  Raanan Marants; Elena Qirjazi; Claire J Grant; Ting-Yim Lee; Christopher W McIntyre
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 10.121

4.  Arterial spin labelling MRI to measure renal perfusion: a systematic review and statement paper.

Authors:  Aghogho Odudu; Fabio Nery; Anita A Harteveld; Roger G Evans; Douglas Pendse; Charlotte E Buchanan; Susan T Francis; María A Fernández-Seara
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 5.992

5.  Noninvasive measurement of renal blood flow by magnetic resonance imaging in rats.

Authors:  Cesar A Romero; Glauber Cabral; Robert A Knight; Guangliang Ding; Edward L Peterson; Oscar A Carretero
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2017-10-04

Review 6.  Could MRI Be Used To Image Kidney Fibrosis? A Review of Recent Advances and Remaining Barriers.

Authors:  General Leung; Anish Kirpalani; Stephen G Szeto; Maya Deeb; Warren Foltz; Craig A Simmons; Darren A Yuen
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 7.  Endothelial colony-forming cells and pro-angiogenic cells: clarifying definitions and their potential role in mitigating acute kidney injury.

Authors:  D P Basile; J A Collett; M C Yoder
Journal:  Acta Physiol (Oxf)       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 6.311

8.  Renal blood oxygenation level-dependent imaging: contribution of R2 to R2* values.

Authors:  Pierre-Hugues Vivier; Pippa Storey; Hersh Chandarana; Akira Yamamoto; Kristopher Tantillo; Umer Khan; Jeff L Zhang; Eric E Sigmund; Henry Rusinek; James S Babb; Michael Bubenheim; Vivian S Lee
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Renal perfusion imaging with two-dimensional navigator gated arterial spin labeling.

Authors:  Huan Tan; Ioannis Koktzoglou; Pottumarthi V Prasad
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Volumetric Arterial Spin-labeled Perfusion Imaging of the Kidneys with a Three-dimensional Fast Spin Echo Acquisition.

Authors:  Philip M Robson; Ananth J Madhuranthakam; Martin P Smith; Maryellen R M Sun; Weiying Dai; Neil M Rofsky; Ivan Pedrosa; David C Alsop
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 3.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.