BACKGROUND: Inter-observer variability limits the reproducibility of pelvic floor motion measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Our aim was to develop a semi-automated program measuring pelvic floor motion in a reproducible and refined manner. METHODS: Pelvic floor anatomy and motion during voluntary contraction (squeeze) and rectal evacuation were assessed by MRI in 64 women with fecal incontinence (FI) and 64 age-matched controls. A radiologist measured anorectal angles and anorectal junction motion. A semi-automated program did the same and also dissected anorectal motion into perpendicular vectors representing the puborectalis and other pelvic floor muscles, assessed the pubococcygeal angle, and evaluated pelvic rotation. KEY RESULTS: Manual and semi-automated measurements of anorectal junction motion (r = 0.70; P < 0.0001) during squeeze and evacuation were correlated, as were anorectal angles at rest, squeeze, and evacuation; angle change during squeeze or evacuation was less so. Semi-automated measurements of anorectal and pelvic bony motion were also reproducible within subjects. During squeeze, puborectalis injury was associated (P ≤ 0.01) with smaller puborectalis but not pelvic floor motion vectors, reflecting impaired puborectalis function. The pubococcygeal angle, reflecting posterior pelvic floor motion, was smaller during squeeze and larger during evacuation. However, pubococcygeal angles and pelvic rotation during squeeze and evacuation did not differ significantly between FI and controls. CONCLUSION & INFERENCES: This semi-automated program provides a reproducible, efficient, and refined analysis of pelvic floor motion by MRI. Puborectalis injury is independently associated with impaired motion of puborectalis, not other pelvic floor muscles in controls and women with FI.
BACKGROUND: Inter-observer variability limits the reproducibility of pelvic floor motion measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Our aim was to develop a semi-automated program measuring pelvic floor motion in a reproducible and refined manner. METHODS: Pelvic floor anatomy and motion during voluntary contraction (squeeze) and rectal evacuation were assessed by MRI in 64 women with fecal incontinence (FI) and 64 age-matched controls. A radiologist measured anorectal angles and anorectal junction motion. A semi-automated program did the same and also dissected anorectal motion into perpendicular vectors representing the puborectalis and other pelvic floor muscles, assessed the pubococcygeal angle, and evaluated pelvic rotation. KEY RESULTS: Manual and semi-automated measurements of anorectal junction motion (r = 0.70; P < 0.0001) during squeeze and evacuation were correlated, as were anorectal angles at rest, squeeze, and evacuation; angle change during squeeze or evacuation was less so. Semi-automated measurements of anorectal and pelvic bony motion were also reproducible within subjects. During squeeze, puborectalis injury was associated (P ≤ 0.01) with smaller puborectalis but not pelvic floor motion vectors, reflecting impaired puborectalis function. The pubococcygeal angle, reflecting posterior pelvic floor motion, was smaller during squeeze and larger during evacuation. However, pubococcygeal angles and pelvic rotation during squeeze and evacuation did not differ significantly between FI and controls. CONCLUSION & INFERENCES: This semi-automated program provides a reproducible, efficient, and refined analysis of pelvic floor motion by MRI. Puborectalis injury is independently associated with impaired motion of puborectalis, not other pelvic floor muscles in controls and women with FI.
Authors: Christina Lewicky-Gaupp; Cynthia Brincat; Aisha Yousuf; Divya A Patel; John O L Delancey; Dee E Fenner Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Adil E Bharucha; Alan R Zinsmeister; G Richard Locke; Cathy Schleck; Kimberly McKeon; L Joseph Melton Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Mark E Lockhart; Julia R Fielding; Holly E Richter; Linda Brubaker; Caryl G Salomon; Wen Ye; Christiane M Hakim; Clifford Y Wai; Alan H Stolpen; Anne M Weber Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-09-16 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Marta E Heilbrun; Ingrid E Nygaard; Mark E Lockhart; Holly E Richter; Morton B Brown; Kimberley S Kenton; David D Rahn; John V Thomas; Alison C Weidner; Charles W Nager; John O Delancey Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2010-03-12 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Maaike P Terra; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Inge Vervoorn; Marije Deutekom; Martin N J M Wasser; Theo D Witkamp; Annette C Dobben; Cor G M I Baeten; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Jaap Stoker Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-04-04 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Susrutha Puthanmadhom Narayanan; Mayank Sharma; Joel G Fletcher; Ronald A Karwoski; David R Holmes; Adil E Bharucha Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2019-04-26 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: P Tirumanisetty; D Prichard; J G Fletcher; S Chakraborty; A R Zinsmeister; A E Bharucha Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2018-03-02 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: David Prichard; Doris M Harvey; Joel G Fletcher; Alan R Zinsmeister; Adil E Bharucha Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2015-04-11 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Adil E Bharucha; Charles H Knowles; Isabelle Mack; Allison Malcolm; Nicholas Oblizajek; Satish Rao; S Mark Scott; Andrea Shin; Paul Enck Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2022-08-10 Impact factor: 65.038
Authors: Brototo Deb; Mayank Sharma; Joel G Fletcher; Sushmitha Grama Srinivasan; Alexandra Chronopoulou; Jun Chen; Kent R Bailey; Kelly J Feuerhak; Adil E Bharucha Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2021-12-22 Impact factor: 22.682