Brototo Deb1, Mayank Sharma1, Joel G Fletcher2, Sushmitha Grama Srinivasan1, Alexandra Chronopoulou3, Jun Chen4, Kent R Bailey4, Kelly J Feuerhak5, Adil E Bharucha6. 1. Mayo Clinic School of Graduate Medical Education, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota. 2. Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 3. Department of Statistics, University of Illinois, Champaign, Illinois. 4. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 5. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 6. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Electronic address: Bharucha.adil@mayo.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Diagnostic tests for defecatory disorders (DDs) asynchronously measure anorectal pressures and evacuation and show limited agreement; thus, abdominopelvic-rectoanal coordination in normal defecation and DDs is poorly characterized. We aimed to investigate anorectal pressures, anorectal and abdominal motion, and evacuation simultaneously in healthy and constipated women. METHODS: Abdominal wall and anorectal motion, anorectal pressures, and rectal evacuation were measured simultaneously with supine magnetic resonance defecography and anorectal manometry. Evacuators were defined as those who attained at least 25% rectal evacuation. Supervised (logistic regression and random forest algorithm) and unsupervised (k-means cluster) analyses identified abdominal and anorectal variables that predicted evacuation. RESULTS: We evaluated 28 healthy and 26 constipated women (evacuators comprised 19 healthy participants and 8 patients). Defecation was initiated by abdominal wall expansion that was coordinated with anorectal descent, increased rectal and anal pressure, and then anal relaxation and rectal evacuation. Compared with evacuators, nonevacuators had lower anal diameters during simulated defecation, rectal pressure, anorectal junction descent, and abdominopelvic-rectoanal coordination (P < .05). Unsupervised cluster analysis identified 3 clusters that were associated with evacuator status (P < .01), that is, 10 evacuators (83%), 16 evacuators (73%), and 1 evacuator (5%) in clusters 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Each cluster had distinct characteristics (eg, maximum abdominosacral distance, rectal pressure, anorectal junction descent, anal diameter) and correlates that were more (clusters 1-2) or less (cluster 3) conducive to evacuation. Cluster 2 had 16 evacuators (73%) and intermediate characteristics (eg, lower anal resting pressure and relaxation during evacuation; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Women with DDs and a modest proportion of healthy women had specific patterns of anorectal dysfunction, including inadequate rectal pressurization, anal relaxation, and abdominopelvic-rectoanal coordination. These observations may guide individualized therapy for DDs in the future.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Diagnostic tests for defecatory disorders (DDs) asynchronously measure anorectal pressures and evacuation and show limited agreement; thus, abdominopelvic-rectoanal coordination in normal defecation and DDs is poorly characterized. We aimed to investigate anorectal pressures, anorectal and abdominal motion, and evacuation simultaneously in healthy and constipated women. METHODS: Abdominal wall and anorectal motion, anorectal pressures, and rectal evacuation were measured simultaneously with supine magnetic resonance defecography and anorectal manometry. Evacuators were defined as those who attained at least 25% rectal evacuation. Supervised (logistic regression and random forest algorithm) and unsupervised (k-means cluster) analyses identified abdominal and anorectal variables that predicted evacuation. RESULTS: We evaluated 28 healthy and 26 constipated women (evacuators comprised 19 healthy participants and 8 patients). Defecation was initiated by abdominal wall expansion that was coordinated with anorectal descent, increased rectal and anal pressure, and then anal relaxation and rectal evacuation. Compared with evacuators, nonevacuators had lower anal diameters during simulated defecation, rectal pressure, anorectal junction descent, and abdominopelvic-rectoanal coordination (P < .05). Unsupervised cluster analysis identified 3 clusters that were associated with evacuator status (P < .01), that is, 10 evacuators (83%), 16 evacuators (73%), and 1 evacuator (5%) in clusters 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Each cluster had distinct characteristics (eg, maximum abdominosacral distance, rectal pressure, anorectal junction descent, anal diameter) and correlates that were more (clusters 1-2) or less (cluster 3) conducive to evacuation. Cluster 2 had 16 evacuators (73%) and intermediate characteristics (eg, lower anal resting pressure and relaxation during evacuation; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Women with DDs and a modest proportion of healthy women had specific patterns of anorectal dysfunction, including inadequate rectal pressurization, anal relaxation, and abdominopelvic-rectoanal coordination. These observations may guide individualized therapy for DDs in the future.
Authors: Susrutha Puthanmadhom Narayanan; Mayank Sharma; Joel G Fletcher; Ronald A Karwoski; David R Holmes; Adil E Bharucha Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2019-04-26 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Adil E Bharucha; Joel G Fletcher; Barb Seide; Stephen J Riederer; Alan R Zinsmeister Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Isabelle M A van Gruting; Aleksandra Stankiewicz; Kirsten Kluivers; Riccardo De Bin; Helena Blake; Abdul H Sultan; Ranee Thakar Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Ugo Grossi; Emma V Carrington; Adil E Bharucha; Emma J Horrocks; S Mark Scott; Charles H Knowles Journal: Gut Date: 2015-03-12 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Adil E Bharucha; Guido Basilisco; Allison Malcolm; Tae Hee Lee; Matthew B Hoy; S Mark Scott; Satish S C Rao Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2022-02-27 Impact factor: 3.960