Literature DB >> 22763796

Immediate or delayed SWL in ureteric stones: a prospective and randomized study.

Sami Uguz1, Temucin Senkul, Hasan Soydan, Ferhat Ates, Ilker Akyol, Ercan Malkoc, Kadir Vehbi Baykal.   

Abstract

The objective is to compare immediate and delayed SWL as a treatment for ureter stones between 5 and 20 mm. Patients who applied to the emergency department with single, radio opaque ureteric stone of 5-20 mm size were included in the study. Patients were randomized into immediate and delayed SWL groups. SWL were carried out after pain relief in the delayed group. Maximum of three SWL sessions were applied to the patients with stones of 5 mm or bigger in diameter, leaving at least 3 days interval in-between. Stone-free rate after first session was similar in two groups. When CIRF was also considered as success, the success rate of SWL in the immediate SWL group was higher after first session (p = 0.02). Immediate SWL had a greater success rate in upper ureteric stones (p = 0.019). Overall average time required for elimination of stones was shorter in immediate SWL group than delayed SWL group (p = 0.033). The success rate after first SWL session (including CIRF) was 59 % for patients with chronic pain in the delayed group and 100 % for patients with acute pain in the immediate group. According to the hydronephrosis grade, success rates were 71 and 44.4 % for patients with grade 1 or no hydronephrosis in the immediate SWL group, and for patients with grade 2 or larger hydronephrosis in the delayed SWL group, respectively, after first SWL session. Immediate SWL insures stone-free status in a shorter time in cases with renal colicky pain and ureteral stones, particularly upper ureteral stones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22763796     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-012-0490-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Res        ISSN: 0300-5623


  20 in total

1.  Rapid extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatment after a first colic episode correlates with accelerated ureteral stone clearance.

Authors:  Christian Seitz; Harun Fajković; Mesut Remzi; Matthias Waldert; Mehmet Ozsoy; Gero Kramer; Michael Marberger
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-12-28       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  A prospective randomized comparison between early (<48 hours of onset of colicky pain) versus delayed shockwave lithotripsy for symptomatic upper ureteral calculi: a single center experience.

Authors:  Anup Kumar; Nayan K Mohanty; Manoj Jain; Sanjay Prakash; Rajender P Arora
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Ureteral Stones Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi. The American Urological Association.

Authors:  J W Segura; G M Preminger; D G Assimos; S P Dretler; R I Kahn; J E Lingeman; J N Macaluso
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 4.  Lithotripsy in the treatment of urinary lithiasis.

Authors:  P Tombolini; M Ruoppolo; C Bellorofonte; C Zaatar; M Follini
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.902

5.  Emergency extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for acute renal colic caused by upper urinary-tract stones.

Authors:  Sergey Kravchick; Igor Bunkin; Eugeny Stepnov; Ronit Peled; Leonid Agulansky; Shmuel Cytron
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for obstructing ureteral stones.

Authors:  M Tligui; M R El Khadime; K Tchala; F Haab; O Traxer; B Gattegno; P Thibault
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Rapid extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for proximal ureteral calculi in colic versus noncolic patients.

Authors:  Christian Seitz; Enis Tanovic; Zeljko Kikic; Mazda Memarsadeghi; Harun Fajkovic
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Effect of diuresis on extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy treatment of ureteric calculi.

Authors:  T A Azm; H Higazy
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  2002

9.  Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for solitary distal ureteral stones: does the degree of urinary obstruction affect success?

Authors:  Murat Demirbas; Ahmet C Kose; Murat Samli; Cem Guler; Turgay Kara; Mustafa Karalar
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Evaluation of emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for obstructing ureteral stones.

Authors:  Ibrahim F Ghalayini; Mohammed A Al-Ghazo; Yousef S Khader
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Acute management of stones: when to treat or not to treat?

Authors:  Helene Jung; Palle J S Osther
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Emergent versus delayed lithotripsy for obstructing ureteral stones: a cumulative analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Davide Arcaniolo; Marco De Sio; Jens Rassweiler; Jilian Nicholas; Estevão Lima; Giuseppe Carrieri; Evangelos Liatsikos; Vincenzo Mirone; Manoj Monga; Riccardo Autorino
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Canadian Urological Association guideline: Management of ureteral calculi - Abridged version.

Authors:  Jason Y Lee; Sero Andonian; Naeem Bhojani; Jennifer Bjazevic; Ben H Chew; Shubha De; Hazem Elmansy; Andrea G Lantz-Powers; Kenneth T Pace; Trevor D Schuler; Rajiv K Singal; Peter Wang; Michael Ordon
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Canadian Urological Association guideline: Management of ureteral calculi - Full-text.

Authors:  Jason Y Lee; Sero Andonian; Naeem Bhojani; Jennifer Bjazevic; Ben H Chew; Shubha De; Hazem Elmansy; Andrea G Lantz-Powers; Kenneth T Pace; Trevor D Schuler; Rajiv K Singal; Peter Wang; Michael Ordon
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.862

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.