Literature DB >> 22763097

Effects of cancer on ovarian response in controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation.

Benny Almog1, Foad Azem, David Gordon, David Pauzner, Ami Amit, Gali Barkan, Ishai Levin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of cancer on ovarian response in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH).
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis study.
SETTING: University-based tertiary medical center. PATIENT(S): 81 cancer patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation cycles for fertility preservation, and age- and date-matched controls undergoing COH for in vitro fertilization (IVF) for male factor infertility. INTERVENTION(S): Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and oocytes retrieval. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Maximal estradiol levels at day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration, duration of stimulation, total amount of gonadotropins administered, number of dominant follicles, number of oocytes retrieved, and rate of metaphase 2 oocytes. RESULT(S): The overall number of dominant follicles and the number of oocytes aspirated of the study group and control were comparable (8.8 ± 5.3 vs. 9.7 ± 4.9, and 11.93 ± 8.3 vs. 12.3 ± 7.9, respectively). The total dose of gonadotropins used and number of stimulation days of the study group (2,250 IU [1,800-3,000 IU] and 9.5 [8-11]) were also similar to the controls (2,100 IU [1,700-2,900] and 10 [9-13]). Comparison between four subgroups of cancer-breast cancer, soft tissue sarcoma, hematologic malignancies, and gastrointestinal tract cancers-showed no difference in their ovarian response indexes. Regression analysis to assess the effect of cancer on ovarian response showed no effect on the main outcome measured. CONCLUSION(S): Cancer does not influence ovarian response in COH for fertility preservation.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22763097     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  15 in total

1.  Oncofertility conundrum: discrepancy between anti-Mϋllerian hormone and mature oocyte yield in a peripubertal girl with Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  D Garg; E B Johnstone; D B Fair; D T Carrell; S Berga; J M Letourneau
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Oocyte retrieval outcomes among adolescent transgender males.

Authors:  Hadar Amir; Asaf Oren; Emilie Klochendler Frishman; Onit Sapir; Yoel Shufaro; Anat Segev Becker; Foad Azem; Avi Ben-Haroush
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Outcomes of ovarian stimulation after treatment with chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jessica L Chan; Lauren N C Johnson; Brenda L Efymow; Mary D Sammel; Clarisa R Gracia
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Medical and elective fertility preservation: impact of removal of the experimental label from oocyte cryopreservation.

Authors:  Samantha B Schon; Maren Shapiro; Clarisa Gracia; Suneeta Senapati
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Fertility preservation for patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update.

Authors:  Alison W Loren; Pamela B Mangu; Lindsay Nohr Beck; Lawrence Brennan; Anthony J Magdalinski; Ann H Partridge; Gwendolyn Quinn; W Hamish Wallace; Kutluk Oktay
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Ovarian response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in women with cancer is as expected according to an age-specific nomogram.

Authors:  Marta Devesa; Francisca Martínez; Buenaventura Coroleu; Ignacio Rodríguez; Clara González; Pedro Nolasco Barri
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  Current trends and progress in clinical applications of oocyte cryopreservation.

Authors:  Aylin P Cil; Emre Seli
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.927

8.  Antral follicle responsiveness to FSH, assessed by the follicular output rate (FORT), is altered in Hodgkin's lymphoma when compared with breast cancer candidates for fertility preservation.

Authors:  Charlotte Sonigo; Marjorie Comtet; Solene Duros; Christophe Sifer; Nathalie Sermondade; Michaël Grynberg
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Fertility preservation: ovarian response to freeze oocytes is not affected by different malignant diseases-an analysis of 992 stimulations.

Authors:  M von Wolff; T Bruckner; T Strowitzki; A Germeyer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Fertility preservation before hematopoetic stem cell transplantation: a case series of women with GATA binding protein 2 deficiency, dedicator of cytokinesis 8 deficiency, and sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Alexandra Aserlind; Anne Martini; Jiawen Dong; Jessica Zolton; Olivia Carpinello; Alan DeCherney
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2020-10-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.