Pamela DeRosse1, Anil K Malhotra, Todd Lencz. 1. Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA. pderosse@lij.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Relative to recent successes in elucidating the genetic mechanisms associated with complex diseases, including macular degeneration, diabetes mellitus, type 2, heart disease, and cancer, molecular genetic approaches to psychiatric illness have met with more limited success. While factors such as small allelic effects, allelic heterogeneity, and variation in population substructure have received considerable attention in attempt to explain the paucity of significant results in psychiatric genetics, significantly less focus has been directed toward phenotypic factors. METHOD: Data derived from molecular genetic studies of the psychosis phenotype in patients with a range of psychiatric illnesses are reviewed. RESULTS: Available data suggest that genes do not respect the boundaries of the current diagnostic system but may confer risk for symptom-based phenotypic variation that traverses those boundaries. CONCLUSIONS: Molecular genetic studies offer convincing evidence for a relation between genetic variation and symptom-based phenotypic variation within psychiatric illness. These data may provide novel insights into the pathophysiology of schizophrenia and other related disorders. The exploration of relations between genetic variation and symptom variation that traverses traditional diagnostic boundaries may ultimately lead to more refined classification systems that more closely reflect the genetic etiology of psychiatric illness.
OBJECTIVE: Relative to recent successes in elucidating the genetic mechanisms associated with complex diseases, including macular degeneration, diabetes mellitus, type 2, heart disease, and cancer, molecular genetic approaches to psychiatric illness have met with more limited success. While factors such as small allelic effects, allelic heterogeneity, and variation in population substructure have received considerable attention in attempt to explain the paucity of significant results in psychiatric genetics, significantly less focus has been directed toward phenotypic factors. METHOD: Data derived from molecular genetic studies of the psychosis phenotype in patients with a range of psychiatric illnesses are reviewed. RESULTS: Available data suggest that genes do not respect the boundaries of the current diagnostic system but may confer risk for symptom-based phenotypic variation that traverses those boundaries. CONCLUSIONS: Molecular genetic studies offer convincing evidence for a relation between genetic variation and symptom-based phenotypic variation within psychiatric illness. These data may provide novel insights into the pathophysiology of schizophrenia and other related disorders. The exploration of relations between genetic variation and symptom variation that traverses traditional diagnostic boundaries may ultimately lead to more refined classification systems that more closely reflect the genetic etiology of psychiatric illness.
Authors: Nicole C Allen; Sachin Bagade; Matthew B McQueen; John P A Ioannidis; Fotini K Kavvoura; Muin J Khoury; Rudolph E Tanzi; Lars Bertram Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Peter McGuffin; Jo Knight; Gerome Breen; Shyama Brewster; Peter R Boyd; Nick Craddock; Mike Gill; Ania Korszun; Wolfgang Maier; Lefkos Middleton; Ole Mors; Michael J Owen; Julia Perry; Martin Preisig; Theodore Reich; John Rice; Marcella Rietschel; Lisa Jones; Pak Sham; Anne E Farmer Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2005-10-03 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Sagiv Shifman; Michal Bronstein; Meira Sternfeld; Anne Pisanté-Shalom; Efrat Lev-Lehman; Avraham Weizman; Ilya Reznik; Baruch Spivak; Nimrod Grisaru; Leon Karp; Richard Schiffer; Moshe Kotler; Rael D Strous; Marnina Swartz-Vanetik; Haim Y Knobler; Eilat Shinar; Jacques S Beckmann; Benjamin Yakir; Neil Risch; Naomi B Zak; Ariel Darvasi Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2002-10-25 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Franck Schürhoff; Andrei Szöke; Fabien Chevalier; Isabelle Roy; Alexandre Méary; Frank Bellivier; Bruno Giros; Marion Leboyer Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2007-01-05 Impact factor: 3.568
Authors: K S Kendler; J M Myers; F A O'Neill; R Martin; B Murphy; C J MacLean; D Walsh; R E Straub Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Aiden Corvin; Gary Donohoe; Kevin McGhee; Kevin Murphy; Niamh Kenny; Siobhan Schwaiger; Jeanne Marie Nangle; Derek Morris; Michael Gill Journal: Neurosci Lett Date: 2007-09-08 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Cathryn M Lewis; Douglas F Levinson; Lesley H Wise; Lynn E DeLisi; Richard E Straub; Iiris Hovatta; Nigel M Williams; Sibylle G Schwab; Ann E Pulver; Stephen V Faraone; Linda M Brzustowicz; Charles A Kaufmann; David L Garver; Hugh M D Gurling; Eva Lindholm; Hilary Coon; Hans W Moises; William Byerley; Sarah H Shaw; Andrea Mesen; Robin Sherrington; F Anthony O'Neill; Dermot Walsh; Kenneth S Kendler; Jesper Ekelund; Tiina Paunio; Jouko Lönnqvist; Leena Peltonen; Michael C O'Donovan; Michael J Owen; Dieter B Wildenauer; Wolfgang Maier; Gerald Nestadt; Jean-Louis Blouin; Stylianos E Antonarakis; Bryan J Mowry; Jeremy M Silverman; Raymond R Crowe; C Robert Cloninger; Ming T Tsuang; Dolores Malaspina; Jill M Harkavy-Friedman; Dragan M Svrakic; Anne S Bassett; Jennifer Holcomb; Gursharan Kalsi; Andrew McQuillin; Jon Brynjolfson; Thordur Sigmundsson; Hannes Petursson; Elena Jazin; Tomas Zoëga; Tomas Helgason Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2003-06-11 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Umut Kırlı; Tolga Binbay; Hayriye Elbi; Marjan Drukker; Bülent Kayahan; Ferda Özkınay; Hüseyin Onay; Köksal Alptekin; Jim van Os Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2019-08-07 Impact factor: 4.157