Literature DB >> 22760108

The handgrip strength test as a measure of function in breast cancer survivors: relationship to cancer-related symptoms and physical and physiologic parameters.

Irene Cantarero-Villanueva1, Carolina Fernández-Lao, Lourdes Díaz-Rodríguez, Cesar Fernández-de-Las-Peñas, Jonatan R Ruiz, Manuel Arroyo-Morales.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the relationship of muscular strength, as measured by the handgrip strength (HGS) test, with pain, fitness, fatigue, mood, and autonomic nervous system function in breast cancer survivors.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional study comprising 95 breast cancer survivors was conducted. HGS; heart rate variability; pressure pain threshold of the neck, shoulder, hand, and tibia of the affected side; and fitness level (6-min walk test, neck-shoulder mobility, vertical jump, sit-to-stand test, and trunk curl test) were assessed as outcomes. Participants completed the Fatigue Piper Scale and Profile of Mood States questionnaires and the neck-shoulder visual analog scale. Correlation was conducted to examine the relationship of HGS with pain, fitness, fatigue, and mood.
RESULTS: We observed a fair relationship of HGS with shoulder pain and a moderate to fair relationship with fitness (all P < 0.01; ρ range, 0.24-0.56). The relationship between HGS and heart rate variability (high-frequency domain) was weak (P = 0.049, ρ = 0.23). Likewise, the relationship between HGS and Profile of Mood States subscales ranged from weak to fair (all P < 0.001; ρ range, -0.22 to -0.36). HGS showed a weak relationship with Fatigue Piper Scale (all P < 0.01; ρ range, -0.28 to -0.35). Passive shoulder flexion, fatigue, and vertical jump were independent and significant predictors of HGS (P < 0.01; R = 0.466).
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the HGS test might be an important correlate of health in breast cancer survivors. This finding suggests that HGS could be recommended as an adjuvant method of evaluation, which may help with efficiency of clinical practice. Further research on breast cancer patients is needed to confirm or refute these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22760108     DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31825f1538

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0894-9115            Impact factor:   2.159


  21 in total

1.  The anticancer agent doxorubicin disrupts mitochondrial energy metabolism and redox balance in skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Laura A A Gilliam; Kelsey H Fisher-Wellman; Chien-Te Lin; Jill M Maples; Brook L Cathey; P Darrell Neufer
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 7.376

2.  The Piper Fatigue Scale-Revised: translation and psychometric evaluation in Spanish-speaking breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Irene Cantarero-Villanueva; Carolina Fernández-Lao; Lourdes Díaz-Rodríguez; Antonio Ignacio Cuesta-Vargas; César Fernández-de-las-Peñas; Barbara F Piper; Manuel Arroyo-Morales
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Short-term change of handgrip strength after trigger point injection in women with muscular pain in the upper extremities.

Authors:  Soo Jin Lee; Dong Heun Ahn; Ji Hun Jung; Yong Rok Kim; Young Jin Lee
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2014-04-29

4.  Could Objective Tests Be Used to Measure Fatigue in Patients With Advanced Cancer?

Authors:  Gustavo Schvartsman; Minjeong Park; Diane D Liu; Sriram Yennu; Eduardo Bruera; David Hui
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  Factors associated with physical activity of breast cancer patients participating in exercise intervention.

Authors:  Si-Woon Park; Ilkyun Lee; Joong Il Kim; Hyuna Park; Jong Doo Lee; Kyeong Eun Uhm; Ji Hye Hwang; Eun Sook Lee; So-Youn Jung; Yong Hyun Park; Ji Youl Lee
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Measurement of Function Post Hip Fracture: Testing a Comprehensive Measurement Model of Physical Function.

Authors:  Barbara Resnick; Ann L Gruber-Baldini; Gregory Hicks; Glen Ostir; N Jennifer Klinedinst; Denise Orwig; Jay Magaziner
Journal:  Rehabil Nurs       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 1.625

7.  Is it safe and efficacious for women with lymphedema secondary to breast cancer to lift heavy weights during exercise: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Prue Cormie; Kate Pumpa; Daniel A Galvão; Elizabeth Turner; Nigel Spry; Christobel Saunders; Yvonne Zissiadis; Robert U Newton
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 4.442

8.  Association Between Maximal Bench Press Strength and Isometric Handgrip Strength Among Breast Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Benjamin H Rogers; Justin C Brown; David R Gater; Kathryn H Schmitz
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 9.  Clinically Relevant Physical Benefits of Exercise Interventions in Breast Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Amy A Kirkham; Kelcey A Bland; Sarah Sayyari; Kristin L Campbell; Margot K Davis
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.075

10.  Handgrip fatiguing exercise can provide objective assessment of cancer-related fatigue: a pilot study.

Authors:  T Veni; S Boyas; B Beaune; H Bourgeois; A Rahmani; S Landry; A Bochereau; S Durand; B Morel
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-06-24       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.