AIMS: To examine the clinical effectiveness of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in older patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HF-PEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Of the 10 570 hospitalized HF-PEF patients, aged ≥ 65 years, EF ≥ 40%, in OPTIMIZE-HF (2003-2004), linked to Medicare data (up to 31 December 2008), 3806 were not receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or prior ARB therapy. Of these, 303 (8%) patients received new discharge prescriptions for ARBs. Propensity scores for the receipt of ARBs, estimated for each of the 3806 patients, were used to assemble a cohort of 296 pairs of patients receiving and not receiving ARBs, who were balanced on 114 baseline characteristics. Patients had a mean age of 80 years, mean EF of 55%, 69% were women, and 12% were African American. During 6 years of follow-up, the primary composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization occurred in 79% (235/296) and 81% (241/296) of patients receiving and not receiving ARBs, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) associated with ARB use 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74-1.06; P = 0.179]. ARB use had no association with individual endpoints of all-cause mortality (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.76-1.14; P = 0.509), HF hospitalization (HR 0.90, 95% CI, 0.72-1.14; P = 0.389), or all-cause hospitalization (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.77-1.08; P = 0.265). These associations remained unchanged when we compared any (prevalent and new prescriptions) ARB use vs. non-use in a separately assembled propensity-matched cohort of 1137 pairs of HF-PEF patients. CONCLUSIONS: In real-world older HF-PEF patients, ARB use was not associated with improved clinical outcomes.
AIMS: To examine the clinical effectiveness of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in older patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HF-PEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Of the 10 570 hospitalized HF-PEF patients, aged ≥ 65 years, EF ≥ 40%, in OPTIMIZE-HF (2003-2004), linked to Medicare data (up to 31 December 2008), 3806 were not receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or prior ARB therapy. Of these, 303 (8%) patients received new discharge prescriptions for ARBs. Propensity scores for the receipt of ARBs, estimated for each of the 3806 patients, were used to assemble a cohort of 296 pairs of patients receiving and not receiving ARBs, who were balanced on 114 baseline characteristics. Patients had a mean age of 80 years, mean EF of 55%, 69% were women, and 12% were African American. During 6 years of follow-up, the primary composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization occurred in 79% (235/296) and 81% (241/296) of patients receiving and not receiving ARBs, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) associated with ARB use 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74-1.06; P = 0.179]. ARB use had no association with individual endpoints of all-cause mortality (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.76-1.14; P = 0.509), HF hospitalization (HR 0.90, 95% CI, 0.72-1.14; P = 0.389), or all-cause hospitalization (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.77-1.08; P = 0.265). These associations remained unchanged when we compared any (prevalent and new prescriptions) ARB use vs. non-use in a separately assembled propensity-matched cohort of 1137 pairs of HF-PEF patients. CONCLUSIONS: In real-world older HF-PEF patients, ARB use was not associated with improved clinical outcomes.
Authors: Ali Ahmed; Ahsan Husain; Thomas E Love; Giovanni Gambassi; Louis J Dell'Italia; Gary S Francis; Mihai Gheorghiade; Richard M Allman; Sreelatha Meleth; Robert C Bourge Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2006-05-18 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Frederick A Masoudi; Edward P Havranek; Pam Wolfe; Cary P Gross; Saif S Rathore; John F Steiner; Diana L Ordin; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Salim Yusuf; Marc A Pfeffer; Karl Swedberg; Christopher B Granger; Peter Held; John J V McMurray; Eric L Michelson; Bertil Olofsson; Jan Ostergren Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-09-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: John J V McMurray; Jan Ostergren; Karl Swedberg; Christopher B Granger; Peter Held; Eric L Michelson; Bertil Olofsson; Salim Yusuf; Marc A Pfeffer Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-09-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Christopher B Granger; John J V McMurray; Salim Yusuf; Peter Held; Eric L Michelson; Bertil Olofsson; Jan Ostergren; Marc A Pfeffer; Karl Swedberg Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-09-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Gregg C Fonarow; William T Abraham; Nancy M Albert; Wendy A Gattis; Mihai Gheorghiade; Barry Greenberg; Chris M O'Connor; Clyde W Yancy; James Young Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Ali Ahmed; Robert C Bourge; Gregg C Fonarow; Kanan Patel; Charity J Morgan; Jerome L Fleg; Inmaculada B Aban; Thomas E Love; Clyde W Yancy; Prakash Deedwania; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; Gerasimos S Filippatos; Stefan D Anker; Richard M Allman Journal: Am J Med Date: 2013-11-18 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Kanan Patel; Gregg C Fonarow; Momanna Ahmed; Charity Morgan; Meredith Kilgore; Thomas E Love; Prakash Deedwania; Wilbert S Aronow; Stefan D Anker; Ali Ahmed Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2014-10-08 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Phillip H Lam; Poonam Bhyan; Cherinne Arundel; Daniel J Dooley; Helen M Sheriff; Selma F Mohammed; Gregg C Fonarow; Charity J Morgan; Wilbert S Aronow; Richard M Allman; Finn Waagstein; Ali Ahmed Journal: Clin Cardiol Date: 2018-03-22 Impact factor: 2.882
Authors: Mihai Gheorghiade; Gregg C Fonarow; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; John G F Cleland; Javed Butler; Andrew E Epstein; Kanan Patel; Inmaculada B Aban; Wilbert S Aronow; Stefan D Anker; Ali Ahmed Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Ali Ahmed; Michael W Rich; Michael Zile; Paul W Sanders; Kanan Patel; Yan Zhang; Inmaculada B Aban; Thomas E Love; Gregg C Fonarow; Wilbert S Aronow; Richard M Allman Journal: Am J Med Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Erin G Rosenbaugh; Krupa K Savalia; Devika S Manickam; Matthew C Zimmerman Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2013-04-03 Impact factor: 3.619