Literature DB >> 22755430

De novo donor specific antibodies and patient outcomes in renal transplantation.

J M DeVos1, S J Patel, K M Burns, S Dilioglou, L W Gaber, R J Knight, A O Gaber, G A Land.   

Abstract

Single antigen identification of HLA antibodies is used to detect donor specific antibodies (DSAs). However, the impact of DSA elements such as class, relative strength, duration, and longitudinal effect on graft function and survival, remains unclear. Routine DSAs (LabScreen, One Lambda, Inc., Canoga Park, CA) and metabolic studies were performed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-transplant, and every 6 months for renal transplant recipients from 7/2007-7/2010 (n = 389). Biopsies were evaluated by updated Banff 2005 guidelines after two consecutive positive DSAs. Based on these tests, 25% of recipients developed de novo DSA. Those with DSA had increased acute rejection episodes (AR), higher creatinine (Scr), and worse graft survival. Three subgroups of these patients were identified based on duration: persistent DSA (> 1), isolated DSA, or no DSA. Persistent DSA patients were more likely to be African American, and have higher mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) and AR rates. Persistent DSA patients, with or without AR, had elevated Scr. Recipients with DQ-only DSA had higher rates of antibody mediated rejection (AMR). From this, we conclude that routine posttransplant DSA monitoring identifies recipients at risk for graft damage or loss. Persistent de novo DSAs correlated with inferior graft outcomes and AMR. With or without AR, DSA persistence was associated with worse outcomes, possibly warranting intervention. De novo DQ-DSA may be a biomarker for chronic damage and/or AMR, while an isolated DSA determination appears clinically insignificant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22755430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transpl        ISSN: 0890-9016


  8 in total

1.  The Value of Protocol Biopsies to Identify Patients With De Novo Donor-Specific Antibody at High Risk for Allograft Loss.

Authors:  C A Schinstock; F Cosio; W Cheungpasitporn; D M Dadhania; M J Everly; M D Samaniego-Picota; L Cornell; M D Stegall
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  Development of antibody mediated rejection shortly after acute cellular rejection in a pediatric kidney transplantation recipient.

Authors:  Mari Okada; Koichi Kamei; Kentaro Matsuoka; Shuichi Ito
Journal:  CEN Case Rep       Date:  2018-06-12

Review 3.  Immune monitoring as prerequisite for transplantation tolerance trials.

Authors:  K Behnam Sani; B Sawitzki
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Renal allograft rejection, lymphocyte infiltration, and de novo donor-specific antibodies in a novel model of non-adherence to immunosuppressive therapy.

Authors:  Louisa Kühne; Bettina Jung; Helen Poth; Antonia Schuster; Simone Wurm; Petra Ruemmele; Bernhard Banas; Tobias Bergler
Journal:  BMC Immunol       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.615

5.  Specific amino acid patterns define split specificities of HLA-B15 antigens enabling conversion from DNA-based typing to serological equivalents.

Authors:  Burcu Duygu; Benedict M Matern; Lotte Wieten; Christina E M Voorter; Marcel G J Tilanus
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 2.846

6.  Characteristics and Clinical Significance of De Novo Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies after Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Hee-Yeon Jung; Su-Hee Kim; Min-Young Seo; Sun-Young Cho; Youngae Yang; Ji-Young Choi; Jang-Hee Cho; Sun-Hee Park; Yong-Lim Kim; Hyung-Kee Kim; Seung Huh; Dong Il Won; Chan-Duck Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 7.  Incidence and clinical significance of de novo donor specific antibodies after kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Sophia Lionaki; Konstantinos Panagiotellis; Aliki Iniotaki; John N Boletis
Journal:  Clin Dev Immunol       Date:  2013-11-21

8.  Renal Transplant Patients Biopsied for Cause and Tested for C4d, DSA, and IgG Subclasses and C1q: Which Humoral Markers Improve Diagnosis and Outcomes?

Authors:  James C Cicciarelli; Nathan A Lemp; Youngil Chang; Michael Koss; Katrin Hacke; Noriyuki Kasahara; Kevin M Burns; David I Min; Robert Naraghi; Tariq Shah
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2017-01-15       Impact factor: 4.818

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.