Literature DB >> 22754781

CTLA-4 blockade synergizes with cryoablation to mediate tumor rejection.

Rebecca Waitz1, Marcella Fassò, James P Allison.   

Abstract

We report that cryoablation of primary tumors synergizes with anti-CTLA-4 treatment to mediate rejection of secondary tumors in the TRAMP mouse model of prostate cancer. T cells, in particular CD8(+) T cells specific for the TRAMP antigen SPAS-1, were enriched in both secondary tumors and spleens of combination-treated mice.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22754781      PMCID: PMC3382897          DOI: 10.4161/onci.19442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncoimmunology        ISSN: 2162-4011            Impact factor:   8.110


The recently FDA approved immunotherapy, Ipilimumab (commercial name Yervoy) is a fully human monoclonal antibody that blocks the function of CTLA-4, an inhibitory receptor expressed by T cells. CTLA-4 is expressed and trafficked to the T-cell surface upon activation, and blockade of this checkpoint pathway, through administration of monoclonal antibodies, induces antitumor immunity by promoting T-cell survival and proliferation. In clinical trials, Ipilimumab improved overall survival time of metastatic melanoma patients compared with control groups., Studies in mouse models, using a monoclonal antibody that blocks the function of mouse CTLA-4, showed that treatment with CTLA-4 blockade as a single agent results in the rejection of immunogenic tumors. However, rejection of less immunogenic tumors can be achieved only when CTLA-4 blockade is combined with immunotherapies such as those that induce increased antigen uptake and presentation on MHC Class I molecules (a process called “cross-presentation”) by professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs). These types of therapies include GM-CSF secreting whole tumor cell vaccines, radiation or a FLT-ligand expressing vaccine. It is reasonable to hypothesize that in humans, similar combination therapies administered in conjunction with Ipilimumab may boost their effectiveness and increase survival time in a larger fraction of patients. While this hypothesis is currently being tested in clinical trials combining the use of a GM-CSF-expressing tumor cell vaccine (GVAX) with Ipilimumab, we wanted to investigate whether this was also true when anti-CTLA-4 was combined with tumor ablation techniques. Local tumor ablation, such as cryoablation, has occasionally been shown to lead regression of tumor metastases, a phenomenon that could likely be attributed to a systemic anti-tumor immune response resulting from increased, albeit in most cases still insufficient, antigen cross-presentation by professional APC. Starting from the assumption that cryoablation would increase cross-presentation, we hypothesized that administration of anti-CTLA-4 during the destruction of a primary tumor, through cryoablation, would further improve the generation a systemic immune response that would result in the eradication of metastatic disease. The possibility of combining anti-CTLA-4 therapy with cryotherapy is appealing because of the low morbidity and cost-effectiveness of such an ablative technique compared with surgical interventions. Using the transplantable TRAMP model of mouse prostate cancer, we developed a unique system to study the induction of systemic immunity and rejection of a secondary tumor challenge in mice treated with anti-CTLA-4 and cryoablation combination therapy. Our previous work in the TRAMP model led to the discovery of the CD8+ T-cell tumor antigen SPAS-1, which contains a mutation in its antigenic epitope. SPAS-1 was identified as the target of a T cell line derived from the spleen and lymph nodes of mice that received a tumor-rejecting immunotherapy: anti-CTLA-4 and GM-CSF-expressing TRAMP cell vaccine. By this method, SPAS-1 was defined due to its highly immunogenic character and was found to be the immunodominant TRAMP antigen. This finding has enabled us to track the specific CD8+ T-cell response in the TRAMP model through the use of MHC Class I tetramers and ELISPOT assays. TRAMP C2 tumors were implanted on the left flank of male mice and cryoablated when they reached about 5–8 mm in diameter. The mice were then treated with anti-CTLA-4 and rechallenged with a second inoculation of TRAMP C2 on the opposite flank. Strikingly, in mice that received both anti-CTLA-4 and cryoablation, the number of SPAS-1-specific CD8+ T cells per mg of tumor was significantly increased compared with control mice. Furthermore, the SPAS-1-specific T cells were enriched in the spleens of the mice receiving the combination treatment, indicating the induction of a systemic tumor-specific immune response. Importantly, the combination of anti-CTLA-4 in vivo blockade and cryoablation also resulted in improved survival and in an increased percentage of secondary tumor rejection. Examination of secondary tumors by histology and flow cytometry revealed that, compared with controls, tumors from combination treated mice exhibited a shift from an immunologically hostile microenvironment with few CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and a low effector to T regulatory cell ratio to an immunologically permissive microenvironment where tumors were highly infiltrated by effector T cells and the ratio of effector to T regulatory cell was high. Furthermore, CD8+ T cells were important for tumor rejection as their depletion resulted in a decreased effect of the combination therapy. Although the full mechanism of tumor immunity in our model has not been elucidated, it likely involves the exertion of effector function of TRAMP-specific T cells after their activation by activated APCs. Neither cryoablation nor CTLA-4 blockade on their own were sufficient to mediate rejection of secondary tumors (Fig. 1). Therapies such as vaccines, chemotherapies, and radiotherapy that improve antigen cross-presentation may be the most effective treatments to combine with CTLA-4 blockade and we speculate that cryoablation synergizes with CTLA-4 blockade by augmenting antigen cross-presentation. Another possible mechanism is that while a growing intact tumor is likely to have a low level of antigen release in the absence of cryoablation, removal of the primary tumor may result in the removal of a systemic immune suppressive environment. While future studies will delineate the mechanisms by which cryoablation cooperates with CTLA-4 blockade to generate systemic immunity, our current work provides evidence that this combination therapy may improve survival in patients with metastatic disease.

Figure 1. Cryoablation needs to be combined with CTLA-4 blockade to generate systemic immunity of sufficient strength to reject a secondary tumor. (A) A primary TRAMP C2 tumor is inoculated into the left flank of a mouse and allowed to grow until it is large enough to cryoablate. Our model proposes that cryoablation results in the release of antigens, which are taken up by antigen presenting cells (cross-presentation). In the presence of CTLA-4 blockade, SPAS-1 specific T cells maximally proliferate in response to positive signals delivered by the engagement of T cell receptor with SPAS-1 peptide/MHC I complex and CD28 with B7. This enhanced proliferation results in the rejection of a secondary right flank tumor. (B) In the absence of CTLA-4 blockade, CTLA-4 dampens T cell proliferation and a second tumor grows uncontrolled. (C) In absence of cryoablation, diminished antigen cross-presentation results in limited cross-priming of SPAS-1 specific T cells. Even in the presence CTLA-4 blockade, proliferation of SPAS-1 specific T cells is insufficient to mediate rejection of the tumor.

Figure 1. Cryoablation needs to be combined with CTLA-4 blockade to generate systemic immunity of sufficient strength to reject a secondary tumor. (A) A primary TRAMP C2 tumor is inoculated into the left flank of a mouse and allowed to grow until it is large enough to cryoablate. Our model proposes that cryoablation results in the release of antigens, which are taken up by antigen presenting cells (cross-presentation). In the presence of CTLA-4 blockade, SPAS-1 specific T cells maximally proliferate in response to positive signals delivered by the engagement of T cell receptor with SPAS-1 peptide/MHC I complex and CD28 with B7. This enhanced proliferation results in the rejection of a secondary right flank tumor. (B) In the absence of CTLA-4 blockade, CTLA-4 dampens T cell proliferation and a second tumor grows uncontrolled. (C) In absence of cryoablation, diminished antigen cross-presentation results in limited cross-priming of SPAS-1 specific T cells. Even in the presence CTLA-4 blockade, proliferation of SPAS-1 specific T cells is insufficient to mediate rejection of the tumor.
  10 in total

1.  Ipilimumab plus dacarbazine for previously untreated metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Caroline Robert; Luc Thomas; Igor Bondarenko; Steven O'Day; Jeffrey Weber; Claus Garbe; Celeste Lebbe; Jean-François Baurain; Alessandro Testori; Jean-Jacques Grob; Neville Davidson; Jon Richards; Michele Maio; Axel Hauschild; Wilson H Miller; Pere Gascon; Michal Lotem; Kaan Harmankaya; Ramy Ibrahim; Stephen Francis; Tai-Tsang Chen; Rachel Humphrey; Axel Hoos; Jedd D Wolchok
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-05       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  F Stephen Hodi; Steven J O'Day; David F McDermott; Robert W Weber; Jeffrey A Sosman; John B Haanen; Rene Gonzalez; Caroline Robert; Dirk Schadendorf; Jessica C Hassel; Wallace Akerley; Alfons J M van den Eertwegh; Jose Lutzky; Paul Lorigan; Julia M Vaubel; Gerald P Linette; David Hogg; Christian H Ottensmeier; Celeste Lebbé; Christian Peschel; Ian Quirt; Joseph I Clark; Jedd D Wolchok; Jeffrey S Weber; Jason Tian; Michael J Yellin; Geoffrey M Nichol; Axel Hoos; Walter J Urba
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Potent induction of tumor immunity by combining tumor cryoablation with anti-CTLA-4 therapy.

Authors:  Rebecca Waitz; Stephen B Solomon; Elena N Petre; Anne E Trumble; Marcella Fassò; Larry Norton; James P Allison
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Combination immunotherapy of B16 melanoma using anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)-producing vaccines induces rejection of subcutaneous and metastatic tumors accompanied by autoimmune depigmentation.

Authors:  A van Elsas; A A Hurwitz; J P Allison
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1999-08-02       Impact factor: 14.307

5.  Immune-mediated inhibition of metastases after treatment with local radiation and CTLA-4 blockade in a mouse model of breast cancer.

Authors:  Sandra Demaria; Noriko Kawashima; Anne Marie Yang; Mary Louise Devitt; James S Babb; James P Allison; Silvia C Formenti
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Potentiating endogenous antitumor immunity to prostate cancer through combination immunotherapy with CTLA4 blockade and GM-CSF.

Authors:  Lawrence Fong; Serena S Kwek; Shaun O'Brien; Brian Kavanagh; Douglas G McNeel; Vivian Weinberg; Amy M Lin; Jonathan Rosenberg; Charles J Ryan; Brian I Rini; Eric J Small
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Tumor vaccines expressing flt3 ligand synergize with ctla-4 blockade to reject preimplanted tumors.

Authors:  Michael A Curran; James P Allison
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Enhancement of antitumor immunity by CTLA-4 blockade.

Authors:  D R Leach; M F Krummel; J P Allison
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-03-22       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Principles and use of anti-CTLA4 antibody in human cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Karl S Peggs; Sergio A Quezada; Alan J Korman; James P Allison
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 7.486

10.  SPAS-1 (stimulator of prostatic adenocarcinoma-specific T cells)/SH3GLB2: A prostate tumor antigen identified by CTLA-4 blockade.

Authors:  Marcella Fassò; Rebecca Waitz; Yafei Hou; Tae Rim; Norman M Greenberg; Nilabh Shastri; Lawrence Fong; James P Allison
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

  10 in total
  17 in total

1.  What does the future hold for immunotherapy in cancer?

Authors:  Jarushka Naidoo; Bob T Li; Katja Schindler; David B Page
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-05

Review 2.  Trial Watch: Immunomodulatory monoclonal antibodies for oncological indications.

Authors:  Aitziber Buqué; Norma Bloy; Fernando Aranda; Francesca Castoldi; Alexander Eggermont; Isabelle Cremer; Wolf Hervé Fridman; Jitka Fucikova; Jérôme Galon; Aurélien Marabelle; Radek Spisek; Eric Tartour; Laurence Zitvogel; Guido Kroemer; Lorenzo Galluzzi
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 8.110

Review 3.  Immune checkpoint targeting in cancer therapy: toward combination strategies with curative potential.

Authors:  Padmanee Sharma; James P Allison
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 4.  Current modalities in cancer immunotherapy: Immunomodulatory antibodies, CARs and vaccines.

Authors:  Jason Lohmueller; Olivera J Finn
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 12.310

Review 5.  The future of cancer treatment: immunomodulation, CARs and combination immunotherapy.

Authors:  Danny N Khalil; Eric L Smith; Renier J Brentjens; Jedd D Wolchok
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 66.675

6.  Robust Antitumor Responses Result from Local Chemotherapy and CTLA-4 Blockade.

Authors:  Jedd D Wolchok; James P Allison; Charlotte E Ariyan; Mary Sue Brady; Robert H Siegelbaum; Jian Hu; Danielle M Bello; Jamie Rand; Charles Fisher; Robert A Lefkowitz; Kathleen S Panageas; Melissa Pulitzer; Marissa Vignali; Ryan Emerson; Christopher Tipton; Harlan Robins; Taha Merghoub; Jianda Yuan; Achim Jungbluth; Jorge Blando; Padmanee Sharma; Alexander Y Rudensky
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Res       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 11.151

Review 7.  Immune Checkpoint Therapies in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Sangeeta Goswami; Ana Aparicio; Sumit K Subudhi
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.360

Review 8.  Targeting the extracellular matrix for immunomodulation: applications in drug delivery and cell therapies.

Authors:  Samira Aghlara-Fotovat; Amanda Nash; Boram Kim; Robert Krencik; Omid Veiseh
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 4.617

9.  Trial Watch: Adoptive cell transfer for anticancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Erika Vacchelli; Alexander Eggermont; Wolf Hervé Fridman; Jérôme Galon; Eric Tartour; Laurence Zitvogel; Guido Kroemer; Lorenzo Galluzzi
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 8.110

10.  Trial watch: Monoclonal antibodies in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Erika Vacchelli; Alexander Eggermont; Jérôme Galon; Catherine Sautès-Fridman; Laurence Zitvogel; Guido Kroemer; Lorenzo Galluzzi
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 8.110

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.