Literature DB >> 22754411

Two Year Follow-up of the Preservation Unicompartmental Knee Implant.

Rajeev K Jain, Lorraine T Neville, Kace A Ezzet, Robert S Sterling, Raymond L Horwood, Clifford W Colwell.   

Abstract

Reported results of unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) have mixed reviews in comparison with results of tri-compartmental knee arthroplasty (TKA). We prospectively evaluated the short-term results (2 years) of a newer design of a UKA implant (Preservation UKA) with a cobalt-chromium femoral component and an all polyethylene tibial component. Seventy-two patients with intact ligaments and loss of only medial articular cartilage received the Preservation prosthesis. Data were obtained using WOMAC, Knee Society score (KSS), and standard radiographs. WOMAC scores improved by 24 points and KSS improved by 33 points at 2-year follow-up. Mean flexion increased by 4° to126° at 2 years. On X-ray, only one patient had a radiolucency. No fractures occurred. Two knees were revised due to clinical symptoms of medial compartment pain. This 2-year follow-up study of the Preservation UKA shows promising early results. Long-term data would be necessary to compare results with TKA or other unicompartmental replacements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  preservation implant; unicondylar knee arthroplasty

Year:  2011        PMID: 22754411      PMCID: PMC3145866          DOI: 10.1007/s11420-011-9205-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HSS J        ISSN: 1556-3316


  20 in total

Review 1.  Unicompartmental knee replacement: some unanswered questions.

Authors:  R S Laskin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Revision total knee arthroplasty: planning, management, controversies, and surgical approaches.

Authors:  H D Clarke; G R Scuderi
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2001

Review 3.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Todd Borus; Thomas Thornhill
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Survivorship of cemented total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  D E Font-Rodriguez; G R Scuderi; J N Insall
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Can normal knee kinematics be restored with unicompartmental knee replacement?

Authors:  Shantanu Patil; Clifford W Colwell; Kace A Ezzet; Darryl D D'Lima
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Stress fracture of the medial tibial plateau after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a report of 2 cases.

Authors:  Kuang-Ying Yang; Seng-Jin Yeo; Ngai-Nung Lo
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Tibial plateau stress fracture: a complication of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using 4 guide pinholes.

Authors:  Scott A Brumby; Richard Carrington; Shay Zayontz; Tim Reish; Richard D Scott
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 8.  Recognizing and identifying osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daniel J Berry
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2004

9.  A comparison of tricompartmental and unicompartmental arthroplasty for the treatment of gonarthrosis.

Authors:  B T Rougraff; D A Heck; A E Gibson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  The role of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty in providing maximal performance and satisfaction.

Authors:  Craig M McAllister
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.