Literature DB >> 22752683

Single-port cholecystectomy in obese patients: our experience and a review of the literature.

Joachim Reibetanz1, Christoph-Thomas Germer, Katica Krajinovic.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of the present study was to compare the postoperative outcomes between obese and normal-weight patients undergoing single-port cholecystectomy (SPC) for gallstone disease.
METHODS: A prospectively maintained SPC-database was retrospectively analyzed, and the outcomes of obese [body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m(2)] and normal-weight patients were compared. All patients underwent SPC using the reusable X-Cone™ device.
RESULTS: A total of 100 patients underwent SPC between July 2009 and September 2011. Seventeen obese patients (17 %) (median BMI 33.9 kg/m², range 30.0-38.8) were compared to 83 normal-weight patients (median BMI 24.1 kg/m², range 17.3-29.5). The length of the operation (median 75.5 min, range 42-156 vs. median 72.0 min, range 42-129; p = 0.51), conversion rate (N = 2 vs. N = 0; p = 1), postoperative complication rate (9.6 vs. 11.8%; p = 0.68), and postoperative hospital stay (median 3 days, range 1-14 vs. median 3 days, range 2-5; p = 0.74), were comparable for the normal-weight and obese patients.
CONCLUSION: The postoperative outcome of obese patients after SPC is not inferior to that of normal-weight patients undergoing the same operation. Therefore, the BMI should not be considered a key criterion in the patient selection for single-port surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22752683     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-012-0238-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  19 in total

Review 1.  Critical appraisal of single port access cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P Allemann; M Schafer; N Demartines
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Fred Brody; Khashayar Vaziri; Jason Kasza; Claire Edwards
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  A safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy depends upon the establishment of a critical view of safety.

Authors:  Yuichi Yamashita; Taizo Kimura; Sumio Matsumoto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Single port sleeve gastrectomy: strategic use of technology to re-establish fundamental tenets of multiport laparoscopy.

Authors:  Koji Park; John N Afthinos; David Lee; Ninan Koshy; James J McGinty; Julio A Teixeira
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 4.734

Review 5.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a surgeon's initial experience with 56 consecutive cases and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Kurt E Roberts; Daniel Solomon; Andrew J Duffy; Robert L Bell
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Learning curve of transumbilical single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILS): a preliminary study of 80 selected patients with benign gallbladder diseases.

Authors:  Zhengjun Qiu; Jing Sun; Ying Pu; Tao Jiang; Jun Cao; Weidong Wu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the first 100 outpatients.

Authors:  Jose Erbella; Gary M Bunch
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stavros A Antoniou; Rudolph Pointner; Frank A Granderath
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Single-incision sleeve gastrectomy versus conventional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy--a randomised pilot study.

Authors:  Muffazal A Lakdawala; Nor Hisham Muda; Sunita Goel; Aparna Bhasker
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial experience.

Authors:  John R Romanelli; Thomas B Roshek; David C Lynn; David B Earle
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  6 in total

1.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by a single surgeon: findings of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Stefano Partelli; Giuliano Barugola; Alberto Sartori; Stefano Crippa; Massimo Falconi; Giacomo Ruffo
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and overweight patients.

Authors:  Huseyin Yilmaz; Husnu Alptekin; Fahrettin Acar; Akin Calisir; Mustafa Sahin
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Comparison of outcomes after single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in relation to patient body mass index.

Authors:  Eun Jeong Jang; Young Hoon Roh; Chan Joong Choi; Min Chan Kim; Kwan Woo Kim; Hong Jo Choi
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Safety and feasibility of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in obese patients.

Authors:  Masaki Wakasugi; Masahiro Tanemura; Mitsuyoshi Tei; Kenta Furukawa; Yozo Suzuki; Toru Masuzawa; Kentaro Kishi; Hiroki Akamatsu
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2016-12-24

5.  Impact of obesity on surgical outcome after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Toru Obuchi; Noriaki Kameyama; Masato Tomita; Hiroaki Mitsuhashi; Ryohei Miyata; Shigeaki Baba
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.407

6.  Single-Port Laparoscopic and Robotic Cholecystectomy in Obesity (>25 kg/m2).

Authors:  Eun Jeong Jang; Young Hoon Roh; Chang Moo Kang; Dong Kyun Kim; Ki Jae Park
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.