OBJECTIVES: Developing a method of separating intravascular contrast agent concentration to measure the arterial input function (AIF) in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of tumours, and validating its performance in phantom and in vivo experiments. METHODS: A tissue-mimicking phantom was constructed to model leaky tumour vasculature and DCE-MR images of this phantom were acquired. An in vivo study was performed using tumour-bearing rabbits. Co-registered DCE-MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) images were acquired. An independent component analysis (ICA)-based method was developed to separate the intravascular component from DCE-MRI. Results were validated by comparing the time-intensity curves with the actual phantom and in vivo curves. RESULTS: Phantom study: the AIF extracted using ICA correlated well with the true intravascular curve. In vivo study: the AIFs extracted from DCE-MRI using ICA were very close to the true AIF. Intravascular component images were very similar to the CEUS images. The contrast onset times and initial wash-in slope of the ICA-derived AIF showed good agreement with the CEUS curves. CONCLUSION: ICA has the potential to separate the intravascular component from DCE-MRI. This could eliminate the requirement for contrast medium uptake measurements in a major artery and potentially result in more accurate pharmacokinetic parameters. KEY POINTS: • Tumour response to therapy can be inferred from pharmacokinetic parameters. • Arterial input function (AIF) is required for pharmacokinetic modelling of tumours. • Independent component analysis has the potential to measure AIF inside the tumour. • AIF measurement is validated using contrast enhanced ultrasound and phantoms.
OBJECTIVES: Developing a method of separating intravascular contrast agent concentration to measure the arterial input function (AIF) in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of tumours, and validating its performance in phantom and in vivo experiments. METHODS: A tissue-mimicking phantom was constructed to model leaky tumour vasculature and DCE-MR images of this phantom were acquired. An in vivo study was performed using tumour-bearing rabbits. Co-registered DCE-MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) images were acquired. An independent component analysis (ICA)-based method was developed to separate the intravascular component from DCE-MRI. Results were validated by comparing the time-intensity curves with the actual phantom and in vivo curves. RESULTS: Phantom study: the AIF extracted using ICA correlated well with the true intravascular curve. In vivo study: the AIFs extracted from DCE-MRI using ICA were very close to the true AIF. Intravascular component images were very similar to the CEUS images. The contrast onset times and initial wash-in slope of the ICA-derived AIF showed good agreement with the CEUS curves. CONCLUSION:ICA has the potential to separate the intravascular component from DCE-MRI. This could eliminate the requirement for contrast medium uptake measurements in a major artery and potentially result in more accurate pharmacokinetic parameters. KEY POINTS: • Tumour response to therapy can be inferred from pharmacokinetic parameters. • Arterial input function (AIF) is required for pharmacokinetic modelling of tumours. • Independent component analysis has the potential to measure AIF inside the tumour. • AIF measurement is validated using contrast enhanced ultrasound and phantoms.
Authors: Johannes G Korporaal; Marco van Vulpen; Cornelis A T van den Berg; Uulke A van der Heide Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Josephine H Naish; Lucy E Kershaw; David L Buckley; Alan Jackson; John C Waterton; Geoffrey J M Parker Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Alejandro Forner; Carmen Ayuso; María Varela; Jordi Rimola; Amelia J Hessheimer; Carlos Rodriguez de Lope; María Reig; Luís Bianchi; Josep M Llovet; Jordi Bruix Journal: Cancer Date: 2009-02-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: P S Tofts; G Brix; D L Buckley; J L Evelhoch; E Henderson; M V Knopp; H B Larsson; T Y Lee; N A Mayr; G J Parker; R E Port; J Taylor; R M Weisskoff Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: M O Leach; K M Brindle; J L Evelhoch; J R Griffiths; M R Horsman; A Jackson; G C Jayson; I R Judson; M V Knopp; R J Maxwell; D McIntyre; A R Padhani; P Price; R Rathbone; G J Rustin; P S Tofts; G M Tozer; W Vennart; J C Waterton; S R Williams; P Workman Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2005-05-09 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Andriy Fedorov; Jacob Fluckiger; Gregory D Ayers; Xia Li; Sandeep N Gupta; Clare Tempany; Robert Mulkern; Thomas E Yankeelov; Fiona M Fennessy Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2014-01-21 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Kee H Wong; Rafal Panek; Shreerang A Bhide; Christopher M Nutting; Kevin J Harrington; Katie L Newbold Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Wei Huang; Yiyi Chen; Andriy Fedorov; Xia Li; Guido H Jajamovich; Dariya I Malyarenko; Madhava P Aryal; Peter S LaViolette; Matthew J Oborski; Finbarr O'Sullivan; Richard G Abramson; Kourosh Jafari-Khouzani; Aneela Afzal; Alina Tudorica; Brendan Moloney; Sandeep N Gupta; Cecilia Besa; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; James M Mountz; Charles M Laymon; Mark Muzi; Kathleen Schmainda; Yue Cao; Thomas L Chenevert; Bachir Taouli; Thomas E Yankeelov; Fiona Fennessy; Xin Li Journal: Tomography Date: 2016-03