Literature DB >> 22751075

Impact of riparian zone protection from cattle on nutrient, bacteria, F-coliphage, and loading of an intermittent stream.

M D Sunohara1, E Topp, G Wilkes, N Gottschall, N Neumann, N Ruecker, T H Jones, T A Edge, R Marti, D R Lapen.   

Abstract

This 5-yr study compared, via an upstream-downstream experimental design, nutrient and microbial water quality of an intermittent stream running through a small pasture (∼2.5 animals ha) where cattle are restricted from the riparian zone (restricted cattle access [RCA]) and where cattle have unrestricted access to the stream (unrestricted cattle access [URCA]). Fencing in the RCA excluded pasturing cattle to within ∼3 to 5 m of the stream. Approximately 88% (26/32) of all comparisons of mean contaminant load reduction for lower, higher, and all stream flow conditions during the 5-yr study indicated net contaminant load reductions in the RCA; for the URCA, this percentage was 38% (12/32). For all flow conditions, mean percent load reductions in the RCA for nutrients and bacteria plus F-coliphage were 24 and 23%, respectively. These respective percentages for the URCA were -9 and -57% (positive values are reductions; negative values are increases). However, potentially as a result of protected wildlife habitat in the RCA, the mean percent load reduction for for "all flow" was -321% for the RCA and 60% for the URCA; for , these respective percentages were -209% (RCA) and 73% (URCA). For "all flow" situations, mean load reductions for the RCA were significantly greater ( < 0.1) than those from the URCA for NH-N, dissolved reactive phosphorus (DRP), total coliform, , and . For "high flow" situations, mean load reductions were significantly greater for the RCA for DRP, total coliform, and . For "low flow" conditions, significantly greater mean load reductions were in favor of the RCA for DRP, total P, total coliforms, fecal coliforms, , and . In no case were mean pollutant loads in the URCA significantly higher than RCA pollutant loads. Restricting pasturing livestock to within 3 to 5 m of intermittent streams can improve water quality; however, water quality impairment can occur if livestock have unrestricted access to a stream.
Copyright © by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22751075     DOI: 10.2134/jeq2011.0407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Qual        ISSN: 0047-2425            Impact factor:   2.751


  6 in total

1.  Bacteria, viruses, and parasites in an intermittent stream protected from and exposed to pasturing cattle: prevalence, densities, and quantitative microbial risk assessment.

Authors:  G Wilkes; J Brassard; T A Edge; V Gannon; C C Jokinen; T H Jones; N Neumann; K D M Pintar; N Ruecker; P J Schmidt; M Sunohara; E Topp; D R Lapen
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 11.236

2.  Waterborne Viruses and F-Specific Coliphages in Mixed-Use Watersheds: Microbial Associations, Host Specificities, and Affinities with Environmental/Land Use Factors.

Authors:  Tineke H Jones; Julie Brassard; Edward Topp; Graham Wilkes; David R Lapen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Coherence among different microbial source tracking markers in a small agricultural stream with or without livestock exclusion practices.

Authors:  Graham Wilkes; Julie Brassard; Thomas A Edge; Victor Gannon; Cassandra C Jokinen; Tineke H Jones; Romain Marti; Norman F Neumann; Norma J Ruecker; Mark Sunohara; Edward Topp; David R Lapen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Spatiotemporal analysis of Cryptosporidium species/genotypes and relationships with other zoonotic pathogens in surface water from mixed-use watersheds.

Authors:  Graham Wilkes; Norma J Ruecker; Norman F Neumann; Victor P J Gannon; Cassandra Jokinen; Mark Sunohara; Edward Topp; Katarina D M Pintar; Thomas A Edge; David R Lapen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Does Riparian Fencing Protect Stream Water Quality in Cattle-Grazed Lands?

Authors:  Bartosz Grudzinski; Ken Fritz; Walter Dodds
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  The effectiveness of Payments for Ecosystem Services at delivering improvements in water quality: lessons for experiments at the landscape scale.

Authors:  Edwin L Pynegar; Julia P G Jones; James M Gibbons; Nigel M Asquith
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.