Literature DB >> 32367489

Does Riparian Fencing Protect Stream Water Quality in Cattle-Grazed Lands?

Bartosz Grudzinski1, Ken Fritz2, Walter Dodds3.   

Abstract

Cattle degrade streams by increasing sediment, nutrient, and fecal bacteria levels. Riparian fencing is one best management practice that may protect water quality within many grazed lands. Here we surveyed the literature and summarized the responses of sediment, nutrient, and fecal indicator bacteria levels to riparian exclosure fencing in cattle-grazed lands. Overall, our review of relevant literature supports the role of riparian exclosure fencing in reducing the negative impact of cattle on water quality, particularly for sediment and fecal indicator bacteria in temperate forest and temperate grassland streams. Establishing buffer widths > 5-10 m appears to increase the likelihood of water quality improvements. Fencing may also be effective at reducing pollutant inputs during stormflows. Our survey also identified critical spatial and thematic gaps that future research programs should address. Despite cattle grazing being prevalent in 12 terrestrial biomes, our systematic search of the empirical literature identified 26 relevant studies across only three biomes. Regions with the greatest cattle populations remain largely unstudied. In addition, we identified inconsistencies in how studies reported information on regional factors, cattle management, and other metrics related to study results. We provide a list of standard parameters for future studies to consider reporting to improve cross-study comparisons of riparian fencing impacts. We also encourage future studies in semi-arid and tropical regions where cattle grazing is common.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exclosure fencing; Fecal; Grazing; Nutrient; Sediment; Water quality

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32367489      PMCID: PMC7364175          DOI: 10.1007/s00267-020-01297-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  26 in total

1.  Determining sources of fecal pollution in a rural Virginia watershed with antibiotic resistance patterns in fecal streptococci.

Authors:  C Hagedorn; S L Robinson; J R Filtz; S M Grubbs; T A Angier; R B Reneau
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Quality and quantity of suspended particles in rivers: continent-scale patterns in the United States.

Authors:  Walter K Dodds; Matt R Whiles
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2004-03-23       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Reducing fluxes of faecal indicator compliance parameters to bathing waters from diffuse agricultural sources: the Brighouse Bay study, Scotland.

Authors:  D Kay; M Aitken; J Crowther; I Dickson; A C Edwards; C Francis; M Hopkins; W Jeffrey; C Kay; A T McDonald; D McDonald; C M Stapleton; J Watkins; J Wilkinson; M D Wyer
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 8.071

4.  Investigation of river eutrophication as part of a low dissolved oxygen total maximum daily load implementation.

Authors:  William Stringfellow; Joel Herr; Gary Litton; Mark Brunell; Sharon Borglin; Jeremy Hanlon; Carl Chen; Justin Graham; Remie Burks; Randy Dahlgren; Carol Kendall; Russ Brown; Nigel Quinn
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.915

Review 5.  A review of vegetated buffers and a meta-analysis of their mitigation efficacy in reducing nonpoint source pollution.

Authors:  Xuyang Zhang; Xingmei Liu; Minghua Zhang; Randy A Dahlgren; Melissa Eitzel
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 2.751

6.  Intra-annual variation of the association between agricultural best management practices and stream nutrient concentrations.

Authors:  Nolan J T Pearce; Adam G Yates
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Water Quality Functions of Riparian Forest Buffers in Chesapeake Bay Watersheds

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  Influence of streambank fencing on the environmental quality of cattle-excluded pastures.

Authors:  J J Miller; D S Chanasyk; T Curtis; W D Willms
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 2.751

9.  Predicting improved optical water quality in rivers resulting from soil conservation actions on land.

Authors:  J R Dymond; R J Davies-Colley; A O Hughes; C D Matthaei
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 10.  Phosphorus retention in riparian buffers: review of their efficiency.

Authors:  Carl Christian Hoffmann; Charlotte Kjaergaard; Jaana Uusi-Kämppä; Hans Christian Bruun Hansen; Brian Kronvang
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 2.751

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.