PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To describe breast cancer treatment choices from the perspectives of Latina and African American breast cancer survivors. DESIGN: An interdisciplinary team conducted a mixed-methods study of women treated for stages I-IV breast cancer. SETTING: Participants' homes in metropolitan areas. SAMPLE: 39 participants in three groups: monolingual Spanish-speaking Latinas (n = 15), English-speaking Latinas (n = 15), and African American women (n = 9). METHODS: Individual participant interviews were conducted by racially and linguistically matched nurse researchers, and sociodemographic data were collected. Content and matrix analysis methods were used. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Perceptions of breast cancer care. FINDINGS: High rates of mastectomy were noted for early-stage treatment (stage I or II). Among the participants diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer, the majority of English-speaking Latinas (n = 9) and African American women (n = 4) received a mastectomy. However, the majority of the Spanish-speaking Latina group (n = 5) received breast-conserving surgery. Four factors influenced the choice of mastectomy over lumpectomy across the three groups: clinical indicators, fear of recurrence, avoidance of adjuvant side effects, and perceived favorable survival outcomes. Spanish-speaking Latinas were more likely to rely on physician treatment recommendations, and the other two groups used a shared decision-making style. CONCLUSIONS: Additional study is needed to understand how women select and integrate treatment information with the recommendations they receive from healthcare providers. Among the Spanish-speaking Latina group, limited English proficiency, the use of translators in explaining treatment options, and a lack of available educational materials in Spanish are factors that influenced reliance on physician recommendations. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Oncology nurses were notably absent in supporting the women's treatment decision making. Advanced practice oncology nurses, coupled with language-appropriate educational resources, may provide essential guidance in clarifying surgical treatment choices for breast cancer among culturally and linguistically diverse populations.
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To describe breast cancer treatment choices from the perspectives of Latina and African American breast cancer survivors. DESIGN: An interdisciplinary team conducted a mixed-methods study of women treated for stages I-IV breast cancer. SETTING:Participants' homes in metropolitan areas. SAMPLE: 39 participants in three groups: monolingual Spanish-speaking Latinas (n = 15), English-speaking Latinas (n = 15), and African American women (n = 9). METHODS: Individual participant interviews were conducted by racially and linguistically matched nurse researchers, and sociodemographic data were collected. Content and matrix analysis methods were used. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Perceptions of breast cancer care. FINDINGS: High rates of mastectomy were noted for early-stage treatment (stage I or II). Among the participants diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer, the majority of English-speaking Latinas (n = 9) and African American women (n = 4) received a mastectomy. However, the majority of the Spanish-speaking Latina group (n = 5) received breast-conserving surgery. Four factors influenced the choice of mastectomy over lumpectomy across the three groups: clinical indicators, fear of recurrence, avoidance of adjuvant side effects, and perceived favorable survival outcomes. Spanish-speaking Latinas were more likely to rely on physician treatment recommendations, and the other two groups used a shared decision-making style. CONCLUSIONS: Additional study is needed to understand how women select and integrate treatment information with the recommendations they receive from healthcare providers. Among the Spanish-speaking Latina group, limited English proficiency, the use of translators in explaining treatment options, and a lack of available educational materials in Spanish are factors that influenced reliance on physician recommendations. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Oncology nurses were notably absent in supporting the women's treatment decision making. Advanced practice oncology nurses, coupled with language-appropriate educational resources, may provide essential guidance in clarifying surgical treatment choices for breast cancer among culturally and linguistically diverse populations.
Authors: Beth A Virnig; Nancy N Baxter; Elizabeth B Habermann; Roger D Feldman; Cathy J Bradley Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2009 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Mahmut Gumus; Basak O Ustaalioglu; Meral Garip; Emre Kiziltan; Ahmet Bilici; Mesut Seker; Burcak Erkol; Taflan Salepci; Alpaslan Mayadagli; Nazim S Turhal Journal: Breast Care (Basel) Date: 2010-05-27 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: M Clarke; R Collins; S Darby; C Davies; P Elphinstone; V Evans; J Godwin; R Gray; C Hicks; S James; E MacKinnon; P McGale; T McHugh; R Peto; C Taylor; Y Wang Journal: Lancet Date: 2005-12-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: J A van Dongen; A C Voogd; I S Fentiman; C Legrand; R J Sylvester; D Tong; E van der Schueren; P A Helle; K van Zijl; H Bartelink Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-07-19 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Caprice C Greenberg; Eric C Schneider; Stuart R Lipsitz; Clifford Y Ko; Jennifer L Malin; Arnold M Epstein; Jane C Weeks; Katherine L Kahn Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2008-02-01 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Matthew M Poggi; David N Danforth; Linda C Sciuto; Sharon L Smith; Seth M Steinberg; David J Liewehr; Cynthia Menard; Marc E Lippman; Allen S Lichter; Rosemary M Altemus Journal: Cancer Date: 2003-08-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Bernard Fisher; Stewart Anderson; John Bryant; Richard G Margolese; Melvin Deutsch; Edwin R Fisher; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Norman Wolmark Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-10-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Tinuke O Olagunju; Yihang Liu; Li-Jung Liang; James M Stomber; Jennifer J Griggs; Patricia A Ganz; Amardeep Thind; Rose C Maly Journal: Cancer Date: 2018-04-06 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Kimberly R Enard; Patricia Dolan Mullen; Geetanjali R Kamath; Nickell M Dixon; Robert J Volk Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2016-06-06 Impact factor: 2.796