Literature DB >> 22750902

Surgical treatment differences among Latina and African American breast cancer survivors.

Maureen Campesino1, Mary Koithan, Ester Ruiz, Johanna Uriri Glover, Gloria Juarez, Myunghan Choi, Robert S Krouse.   

Abstract

PURPOSE/
OBJECTIVES: To describe breast cancer treatment choices from the perspectives of Latina and African American breast cancer survivors.
DESIGN: An interdisciplinary team conducted a mixed-methods study of women treated for stages I-IV breast cancer.
SETTING: Participants' homes in metropolitan areas. SAMPLE: 39 participants in three groups: monolingual Spanish-speaking Latinas (n = 15), English-speaking Latinas (n = 15), and African American women (n = 9).
METHODS: Individual participant interviews were conducted by racially and linguistically matched nurse researchers, and sociodemographic data were collected. Content and matrix analysis methods were used. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Perceptions of breast cancer care.
FINDINGS: High rates of mastectomy were noted for early-stage treatment (stage I or II). Among the participants diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer, the majority of English-speaking Latinas (n = 9) and African American women (n = 4) received a mastectomy. However, the majority of the Spanish-speaking Latina group (n = 5) received breast-conserving surgery. Four factors influenced the choice of mastectomy over lumpectomy across the three groups: clinical indicators, fear of recurrence, avoidance of adjuvant side effects, and perceived favorable survival outcomes. Spanish-speaking Latinas were more likely to rely on physician treatment recommendations, and the other two groups used a shared decision-making style.
CONCLUSIONS: Additional study is needed to understand how women select and integrate treatment information with the recommendations they receive from healthcare providers. Among the Spanish-speaking Latina group, limited English proficiency, the use of translators in explaining treatment options, and a lack of available educational materials in Spanish are factors that influenced reliance on physician recommendations. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Oncology nurses were notably absent in supporting the women's treatment decision making. Advanced practice oncology nurses, coupled with language-appropriate educational resources, may provide essential guidance in clarifying surgical treatment choices for breast cancer among culturally and linguistically diverse populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22750902      PMCID: PMC3495184          DOI: 10.1188/12.ONF.E324-E331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum        ISSN: 0190-535X            Impact factor:   2.172


  23 in total

1.  Immigrant perceptions of discrimination in health care: the California Health Interview Survey 2003.

Authors:  Diane S Lauderdale; Ming Wen; Elizabeth A Jacobs; Namratha R Kandula
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  A matter of race: early-versus late-stage cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Beth A Virnig; Nancy N Baxter; Elizabeth B Habermann; Roger D Feldman; Cathy J Bradley
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Factors that Affect Patients' Decision-Making about Mastectomy or Breast Conserving Surgery, and the Psychological Effect of this Choice on Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Mahmut Gumus; Basak O Ustaalioglu; Meral Garip; Emre Kiziltan; Ahmet Bilici; Mesut Seker; Burcak Erkol; Taflan Salepci; Alpaslan Mayadagli; Nazim S Turhal
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 4.  Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials.

Authors:  M Clarke; R Collins; S Darby; C Davies; P Elphinstone; V Evans; J Godwin; R Gray; C Hicks; S James; E MacKinnon; P McGale; T McHugh; R Peto; C Taylor; Y Wang
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-12-17       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial.

Authors:  J A van Dongen; A C Voogd; I S Fentiman; C Legrand; R J Sylvester; D Tong; E van der Schueren; P A Helle; K van Zijl; H Bartelink
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-07-19       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Cost comparison of mastectomy versus breast-conserving therapy for early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  W E Barlow; S H Taplin; C K Yoshida; D S Buist; D Seger; M Brown
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-03-21       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Do variations in provider discussions explain socioeconomic disparities in postmastectomy breast reconstruction?

Authors:  Caprice C Greenberg; Eric C Schneider; Stuart R Lipsitz; Clifford Y Ko; Jennifer L Malin; Arnold M Epstein; Jane C Weeks; Katherine L Kahn
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: a trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment.

Authors:  Todd M Tuttle; Elizabeth B Habermann; Erin H Grund; Todd J Morris; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Eighteen-year results in the treatment of early breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy: the National Cancer Institute Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Matthew M Poggi; David N Danforth; Linda C Sciuto; Sharon L Smith; Seth M Steinberg; David J Liewehr; Cynthia Menard; Marc E Lippman; Allen S Lichter; Rosemary M Altemus
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Bernard Fisher; Stewart Anderson; John Bryant; Richard G Margolese; Melvin Deutsch; Edwin R Fisher; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-10-17       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  5 in total

1.  Disparities in the survivorship experience among Latina survivors of breast cancer.

Authors:  Tinuke O Olagunju; Yihang Liu; Li-Jung Liang; James M Stomber; Jennifer J Griggs; Patricia A Ganz; Amardeep Thind; Rose C Maly
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Breast cancer interventions serving US-based Latinas: current approaches and directions.

Authors:  Yamile Molina; Beti Thompson; Noah Espinoza; Rachel Ceballos
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2013-07

Review 3.  Communicating with Patients and Families Around Difficult Topics in Cancer Care Using the COMFORT Communication Curriculum.

Authors:  Elaine Wittenberg; Anne Reb; Elisa Kanter
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 2.315

4.  Are cancer-related decision aids appropriate for socially disadvantaged patients? A systematic review of US randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Kimberly R Enard; Patricia Dolan Mullen; Geetanjali R Kamath; Nickell M Dixon; Robert J Volk
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 5.  Shared decision making in surgery: a scoping review of patient and surgeon preferences.

Authors:  Laura A Shinkunas; Caleb J Klipowicz; Erica M Carlisle
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.796

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.