Literature DB >> 22749763

Vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease I: epidemiological consequences.

J A Backer1, T J Hagenaars, G Nodelijk, H J W van Roermund.   

Abstract

An epidemic of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) can have devastating effects on animal welfare, economic revenues, the export position and society as a whole, as occurred during the 2001 FMD epidemic in the Netherlands. Following the preemptive culling of 260,000 animals during this outbreak, the Dutch government adopted emergency vaccination as preferred control policy. However, a vaccination-to-live strategy has not been applied before, posing unprecedented challenges for effectively controlling the epidemic, regaining FMD-free status and minimizing economic losses. These three topics are covered in an interdisciplinary model analysis. In this first part we evaluate whether and how emergency vaccination can be effectively applied to control FMD epidemics in the Netherlands. For this purpose we develop a stochastic individual-based model that describes FMD virus transmission between animals and between herds, taking heterogeneity between host species (cattle, sheep and pigs) into account. Our results in a densely populated livestock area with >4 farms/km(2) show that emergency ring vaccination can halt the epidemic as rapidly as preemptive ring culling, while the total number of farms to be culled is reduced by a factor of four. To achieve this reduction a larger control radius around detected farms and a corresponding adequate vaccination capacity is needed. Although sufficient for the majority of simulated epidemics with a 2 km vaccination zone, the vaccination capacity available in the Netherlands can be exhausted by pig farms that are on average ten times larger than cattle herds. Excluding pig farms from vaccination slightly increases the epidemic, but more than halves the number of animals to be vaccinated. Hobby flocks - modelled as small-sized sheep flocks - do not play a significant role in propagating the epidemic, and need not be targeted during the control phase. In a more sparsely populated livestock area in the Netherlands with about 2 farms/km(2) the minimal control strategy of culling only detected farms seems sufficient to control an epidemic.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22749763     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  23 in total

1.  Quantitative effects of a declaration of a state of emergency on foot-and-mouth disease.

Authors:  Takenori Yamauchi; Shouhei Takeuchi; Yoichiro Horii; Yuko Yamano; Yoshiki Kuroda; Toshio Nakadate
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.674

2.  Decision-making for foot-and-mouth disease control: Objectives matter.

Authors:  William J M Probert; Katriona Shea; Christopher J Fonnesbeck; Michael C Runge; Tim E Carpenter; Salome Dürr; M Graeme Garner; Neil Harvey; Mark A Stevenson; Colleen T Webb; Marleen Werkman; Michael J Tildesley; Matthew J Ferrari
Journal:  Epidemics       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.396

3.  Evaluating vaccination strategies to control foot-and-mouth disease: a model comparison study.

Authors:  S E Roche; M G Garner; R L Sanson; C Cook; C Birch; J A Backer; C Dube; K A Patyk; M A Stevenson; Z D Yu; T G Rawdon; F Gauntlett
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 4.434

Review 4.  Modelling Farm Animal Welfare.

Authors:  Lisa M Collins; Chérie E Part
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  A Bayesian ensemble approach for epidemiological projections.

Authors:  Tom Lindström; Michael Tildesley; Colleen Webb
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease: do initial conditions affect its benefit?

Authors:  Thibaud Porphyre; Harriet K Auty; Michael J Tildesley; George J Gunn; Mark E J Woolhouse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A comparison between two simulation models for spread of foot-and-mouth disease.

Authors:  Tariq Halasa; Anette Boklund; Anders Stockmarr; Claes Enøe; Lasse E Christiansen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Impact of stakeholders influence, geographic level and risk perception on strategic decisions in simulated foot and mouth disease epizootics in France.

Authors:  Maud Marsot; Séverine Rautureau; Barbara Dufour; Benoit Durand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The impact of resources for clinical surveillance on the control of a hypothetical foot-and-mouth disease epidemic in Denmark.

Authors:  Tariq Halasa; Anette Boklund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Estimation of the transmission of foot-and-mouth disease virus from infected sheep to cattle.

Authors:  Carla Bravo de Rueda; Mart C M de Jong; Phaedra L Eblé; Aldo Dekker
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.683

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.