Literature DB >> 22748533

Toward prospective identification of high-risk surgical patients.

Joshua S Richman1, Patrick W Hosokawa, Sung-Joon Min, Majed G Tomeh, Leigh Neumayer, Darrell A Campbell, William G Henderson, Mary T Hawn.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the feasibility of prospectively identifying patients at high risk for surgical complications using automatable methods focused on patient characteristics. We used data from the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative (60,411 elective surgeries) performed between 2003 and 2008. Regression models for postoperative mortality, overall morbidity, cardiac, thromboembolic, pulmonary, renal, and surgical site infection complications were developed using preoperative patient and planned procedure data. Risk was categorized by quartiles of predicted probability: "low" risk corresponding to the bottom quartile, "average" to the middle two quartiles, and "high" to the top quartile. C-indices were calculated to measure discrimination; model validity was assessed by cross-validation. Models were repeated using only patient characteristics. Risk category was closely related to event rates; 80 to 90 per cent of mortality and cardiac, renal, and pulmonary complications occurred among the 25 per cent of "high-risk" patients. Although thromboembolisms and surgical site infections were less predictable, 60 to 70 per cent of events occurred among high-risk patients. Cross-validation results were consistent and only slightly attenuated when predictors were restricted to patient characteristics alone. Adverse postoperative events are concentrated among patients identifiable preoperatively as high risk. Preoperative risk assessment could allow for efficient interventions targeted to high-risk patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22748533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  4 in total

Review 1.  Precision diagnosis: a view of the clinical decision support systems (CDSS) landscape through the lens of critical care.

Authors:  Arnaud Belard; Timothy Buchman; Jonathan Forsberg; Benjamin K Potter; Christopher J Dente; Allan Kirk; Eric Elster
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Comparison of prospective risk estimates for postoperative complications: human vs computer model.

Authors:  Robert E Glasgow; Mary T Hawn; Patrick W Hosokawa; William G Henderson; Sung-Joon Min; Joshua S Richman; Majed G Tomeh; Darrell Campbell; Leigh A Neumayer
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Acceptability of the decision support for safer surgery tool.

Authors:  Wynne E Norton; Patrick W Hosokawa; William G Henderson; Eric T Volckmann; Joyce Pell; Majed G Tomeh; Robert E Glasgow; Sung-Joon Min; Leigh A Neumayer; Mary T Hawn
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Hospital and geographic variability in two colorectal cancer surgery outcomes: complications and mortality after complications.

Authors:  M Schootman; M Lian; S L Pruitt; S Hendren; M Mutch; A D Deshpande; D B Jeffe; N O Davidson
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.344

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.