Literature DB >> 22747829

Predictors for visual dysfunction in nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas - implications for neurosurgical management.

Kathrin Schmalisch1, Monika Milian, Thilo Schimitzek, Wolf A Lagrèze, Juergen Honegger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite ample experience with surgical treatment of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas, objective data defining the risk for visual compromise depending on the suprasellar extension in pituitary adenomas are sparse. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: We measured the suprasellar extension of 98 newly diagnosed suprasellar nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas on sagittal and coronal magnetic resonance images using reference lines for the skull base level. In addition, the position of the optic chiasm in relation to the suprasellar adenoma was assessed. The findings were correlated with the degree of visual dysfunction and with the type of visual field defects (VFD).
RESULTS: Seventy per cent of the patients suffered from VFD. The most frequent perimetric findings were bilateral (81·2%) or unilateral (10·1%) temporal hemifield defects. For the coronal view, a suprasellar extension of 12 mm was a practicable cut-off value for emergence of visual disturbances (87·0% sensitivity, 72·4% specificity). For the sagittal view, 8-mm suprasellar extension was a suitable cut-off for appearance of chiasma syndrome (87·0% sensitivity, 75·9% specificity). In five of seven cases without a chiasma syndrome despite a suprasellar extension >12 (coronal) and 8 mm (sagittal), the optic chiasm was found in an anterior position. No correlation was found between the position of the chiasm (i.e. anterior, superior or posterior) and the type of VFD (P = 0·647). A highly significant correlation was found between the decline of visual acuity and the suprasellar adenoma extension (P < 0·0001).
CONCLUSION: Cut-off values possess a high sensitivity and specificity for imminent visual disturbances and are helpful for clinical decision-making. A delayed emergence of visual dysfunction may be observed with an anterior position of the optic chiasm.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22747829     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2012.04457.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)        ISSN: 0300-0664            Impact factor:   3.478


  5 in total

1.  Predictive factors of visual function recovery after pituitary adenoma resection: a literature review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Min Sun; Zhi-Qiang Zhang; Chi-Yuan Ma; Sui-Hua Chen; Xin-Jian Chen
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Loss of horizontal macular ganglion cell complex asymmetry: an optical coherence tomography indicator of chiasmal compression.

Authors:  Øystein Kalsnes Jørstad; Andreas Reidar Wigers; Pål Bache Marthinsen; Morten Carstens Moe; Johan Arild Evang
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-25

3.  Preoperative radiographic and clinical factors associated with the visualization of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid during endoscopic transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Lauren E Rotman; Elizabeth N Alford; Matthew C Davis; T Brooks Vaughan; Bradford A Woodworth; Kristen O Riley
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2020-04-04

4.  Optical coherence tomographic angiography detects retinal vascular changes associated with pituitary adenoma.

Authors:  Ping Wei; Julie Falardeau; Aiyin Chen; Jie Wang; Liang Liu; Yali Jia; David Huang
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2022-09-15

5.  Visual Outcomes after Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Resection of Pituitary Adenomas: Our Institutional Experience.

Authors:  Max J van Essen; Ivo S Muskens; Nayan Lamba; Stephan F J Belunek; Arthur T J van der Boog; G Johan Amelink; Peter H Gosselaar; Tristan P C van Doormaal; Aline M E Stades; Joost J C Verhoeff; Maria M van Genderen; Christine A E Eenhorst; Marike L D Broekman
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2020-02-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.