PURPOSE: To examine whether residing in a community designed to promote physical activity moderates the relationship between parent perceptions of the neighborhood and general physical activity or active commuting to school in their children. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: San Bernardino County, California. SUBJECTS: Three hundred sixty-five families (one parent and one child in grades four through eight). Eighty-five reside in a smart growth community designed to be more conducive to physical activity. MEASURES: Parent perceptions assessed using the Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale (NEWS). General child physical activity was measured using accelerometers, and active commuting was self-reported by children. ANALYSIS: Two sets of regressions were performed: one for general physical activity, and one for active commuting. Separate models were run in the two sets for each of the 14 NEWS factors, while controlling for demographics. RESULTS: For general physical activity, walking infrastructure, lack of cul-de-sacs, and social interaction had significant main effect associations (p ≤ .05). No factors were moderated by community. The relationships between active commuting to school and perceived crime, traffic hazards, hilliness, physical barriers, cul-de-sac connectivity, aesthetics, and walking infrastructure were significant for those in the smart growth community only (p ≤ .05). CONCLUSIONS: Living in an activity-friendly environment is associated with positive relationships between parent perceptions and active commuting behaviors in children. Future interventions should account for both the perceived neighborhood environment and available physical activity infrastructure.
PURPOSE: To examine whether residing in a community designed to promote physical activity moderates the relationship between parent perceptions of the neighborhood and general physical activity or active commuting to school in their children. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: San Bernardino County, California. SUBJECTS: Three hundred sixty-five families (one parent and one child in grades four through eight). Eighty-five reside in a smart growth community designed to be more conducive to physical activity. MEASURES: Parent perceptions assessed using the Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale (NEWS). General child physical activity was measured using accelerometers, and active commuting was self-reported by children. ANALYSIS: Two sets of regressions were performed: one for general physical activity, and one for active commuting. Separate models were run in the two sets for each of the 14 NEWS factors, while controlling for demographics. RESULTS: For general physical activity, walking infrastructure, lack of cul-de-sacs, and social interaction had significant main effect associations (p ≤ .05). No factors were moderated by community. The relationships between active commuting to school and perceived crime, traffic hazards, hilliness, physical barriers, cul-de-sac connectivity, aesthetics, and walking infrastructure were significant for those in the smart growth community only (p ≤ .05). CONCLUSIONS: Living in an activity-friendly environment is associated with positive relationships between parent perceptions and active commuting behaviors in children. Future interventions should account for both the perceived neighborhood environment and available physical activity infrastructure.
Authors: Delfien Van Dyck; Greet Cardon; Benedicte Deforche; James F Sallis; Neville Owen; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij Journal: Prev Med Date: 2009-09-12 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Carlos F Mendes de Leon; Kathleen A Cagney; Julia L Bienias; Lisa L Barnes; Kimberly A Skarupski; Paul A Scherr; Denis A Evans Journal: J Aging Health Date: 2009-02
Authors: Kristian Larsen; Jason Gilliland; Paul Hess; Patricia Tucker; Jennifer Irwin; Meizi He Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2008-12-23 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Kylie Ball; Robert W Jeffery; David A Crawford; Rebecca J Roberts; Jo Salmon; Anna F Timperio Journal: Prev Med Date: 2008-05-09 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Gina S Lovasi; Ofira Schwartz-Soicher; James W Quinn; Diana K Berger; Kathryn M Neckerman; Risa Jaslow; Karen K Lee; Andrew Rundle Journal: Prev Med Date: 2013-05-31 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Natalie Colabianchi; Morgan N Clennin; Marsha Dowda; Kerry L McIver; Rod K Dishman; Dwayne E Porter; Russell R Pate Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2019-04-09 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Silvia A González; Olga L Sarmiento; Pablo D Lemoine; Richard Larouche; Jose D Meisel; Mark S Tremblay; Melisa Naranjo; Stephanie T Broyles; Mikael Fogelholm; Gustavo A Holguin; Estelle V Lambert; Peter T Katzmarzyk Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-05-28 Impact factor: 3.390