Literature DB >> 18544463

Mismatch between perceived and objective measures of physical activity environments.

Kylie Ball1, Robert W Jeffery, David A Crawford, Rebecca J Roberts, Jo Salmon, Anna F Timperio.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the correspondence between measures of physical activity facilities obtained through self-report and objective audits; and identified the socio-demographic, cognitive and behavioral characteristics of those who perceive their physical activity environment to be less supportive than objective measures indicate.
METHODS: Self-report surveys were completed by 1540 women recruited from 45 neighborhoods in Melbourne, Australia. Women reported perceived access to physical activity facilities within 2 km from home, and also socio-demographic, cognitive and behavioral factors. Objective data on physical activity facilities within a 2 km pedestrian catchment area around women's homes were sourced.
RESULTS: There was relatively poor agreement between measures of access to physical activity facilities obtained via self-report and objective assessment. Mismatch between perceived and objectively-assessed environments was more common amongst younger and older women, and women of low income, with low self-efficacy for physical activity, who were less active, who reported using fewer facilities and who had lived in the neighborhood for less than 2 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Future studies of environmental determinants of physical activity should consider incorporating objective indices of access to facilities, or accounting for the systematic bias that may result from relying on self-report perceptions as an indicator of the actual physical activity environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18544463     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  69 in total

1.  The relationship between diet and perceived and objective access to supermarkets among low-income housing residents.

Authors:  Caitlin E Caspi; Ichiro Kawachi; S V Subramanian; Gary Adamkiewicz; Glorian Sorensen
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Improving current practice in reviews of the built environment and physical activity.

Authors:  Klaus Gebel; Ding Ding; Charlie Foster; Adrian E Bauman; James F Sallis
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Do relationships between environmental attributes and recreational walking vary according to area-level socioeconomic status?

Authors:  Takemi Sugiyama; Natasha J Howard; Catherine Paquet; Neil T Coffee; Anne W Taylor; Mark Daniel
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.671

4.  Predictors of discordance between perceived and objective neighborhood data.

Authors:  Erin J Bailey; Kristen C Malecki; Corinne D Engelman; Matthew C Walsh; Andrew J Bersch; Ana P Martinez-Donate; Paul E Peppard; F Javier Nieto
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 3.797

5.  What is my walking neighbourhood? A pilot study of English adults' definitions of their local walking neighbourhoods.

Authors:  Graham Smith; Christopher Gidlow; Rachel Davey; Charles Foster
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 6.457

6.  The working mechanisms of an environmentally tailored physical activity intervention for older adults: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Maartje M van Stralen; Hein de Vries; Aart N Mudde; Catherine Bolman; Lilian Lechner
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 6.457

7.  Deconstructing Williamsburg: Using focus groups to examine residents' perceptions of the building of a walkable community.

Authors:  Andrew T Kaczynski; Michael T Sharratt
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 6.457

8.  Understanding the Relationship between Activity and Neighbourhoods (URBAN) Study: research design and methodology.

Authors:  Hannah M Badland; Grant M Schofield; Karen Witten; Philip J Schluter; Suzanne Mavoa; Robin A Kearns; Erica A Hinckson; Melody Oliver; Hector Kaiwai; Victoria G Jensen; Christina Ergler; Leslie McGrath; Julia McPhee
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Objective and perceived availability of physical activity opportunities: differences in associations with physical activity behavior among urban adolescents.

Authors:  Richard G Prins; Anke Oenema; Klazine van der Horst; Johannes Brug
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 6.457

10.  Correspondence of perceived vs. objective proximity to parks and their relationship to park-based physical activity.

Authors:  Kelsey J Lackey; Andrew T Kaczynski
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 6.457

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.