Literature DB >> 22746953

Studies of implicit prototype extraction in patients with mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer's disease.

Robert M Nosofsky1, Stephen E Denton, Safa R Zaki, Anne F Murphy-Knudsen, Frederick W Unverzagt.   

Abstract

Studies of incidental category learning support the hypothesis of an implicit prototype-extraction system that is distinct from explicit memory (Smith, 2008). In those studies, patients with explicit-memory impairments due to damage to the medial-temporal lobe performed normally in implicit categorization tasks (Bozoki, Grossman, & Smith, 2006; Knowlton & Squire, 1993). However, alternative interpretations are that (a) even people with impairments to a single memory system have sufficient resources to succeed on the particular categorization tasks that have been tested (Nosofsky & Zaki, 1998; Zaki & Nosofsky, 2001) and (b) working memory can be used at time of test to learn the categories (Palmeri & Flanery, 1999). In the present experiments, patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment or early Alzheimer's disease were tested in prototype-extraction tasks to examine these possibilities. In a categorization task involving discrete-feature stimuli, the majority of subjects relied on memories for exceedingly few features, even when the task structure strongly encouraged reliance on broad-based prototypes. In a dot-pattern categorization task, even the memory-impaired patients were able to use working memory at time of test to extract the category structure (at least for the stimulus set used in past work). We argue that the results weaken the past case made in favor of a separate system of implicit prototype extraction. 2012 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22746953      PMCID: PMC3682775          DOI: 10.1037/a0028064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  37 in total

1.  Are Alzheimer's disease patients able to learn visual prototypes?

Authors:  S Kéri; J Kálmán; O Kelemen; G Benedek; Z Janka
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  A single-system interpretation of dissociations between recognition and categorization in a task involving object-like stimuli.

Authors:  S R Zaki; R M Nosofsky
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Dissociating explicit and implicit category knowledge with fMRI.

Authors:  Paul J Reber; Darren R Gitelman; Todd B Parrish; M Marsel Mesulam
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: a complementary-learning-systems approach.

Authors:  Kenneth A Norman; Randall C O'Reilly
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  A high-distortion enhancement effect in the prototype-learning paradigm: dramatic effects of category learning during test.

Authors:  Safa R Zaki; Robeir M Nosofsky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-12

6.  Perceived distance and the classification of distorted patterns.

Authors:  M I Posner; R Goldsmith; K E Welton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1967-01

7.  Learning about categories in the absence of memory.

Authors:  L R Squire; B J Knowlton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity.

Authors:  R C Petersen
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  G McKhann; D Drachman; M Folstein; R Katzman; D Price; E M Stadlan
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Hippocampus and entorhinal cortex in mild cognitive impairment and early AD.

Authors:  Corina Pennanen; Miia Kivipelto; Susanna Tuomainen; Päivi Hartikainen; Tuomo Hänninen; Mikko P Laakso; Merja Hallikainen; Matti Vanhanen; Aulikki Nissinen; Eeva-Liisa Helkala; Pauli Vainio; Ritva Vanninen; Kaarina Partanen; Hilkka Soininen
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.673

View more
  4 in total

1.  Category learning in Alzheimer's disease and normal cognitive aging depends on initial experience of feature variability.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Phillips; Corey T McMillan; Edward E Smith; Murray Grossman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  The effect of encoding conditions on learning in the prototype distortion task.

Authors:  Jessica C Lee; Evan J Livesey
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Abstract Memory Representations in the Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex and Hippocampus Support Concept Generalization.

Authors:  Caitlin R Bowman; Dagmar Zeithamova
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  How experimental trial context affects perceptual categorization.

Authors:  Thomas J Palmeri; Michael L Mack
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.