Literature DB >> 22745873

Predictive value of the korean academy of family medicine in-training examination for certifying examination.

Jung-Jin Cho1, Ji-Yong Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In-training examination (ITE) is a cognitive examination similar to the written test, but it is different from the Clinical Practice Examination of the Korean Academy of Family Medicine (KAFM) Certification Examination (CE). The objective of this is to estimate the positive predictive value of the KAFM-ITE for identifying residents at risk for poor performance on the three types of KAFM-CE.
METHODS: 372 residents who completed the KAFM-CE in 2011 were included. We compared the mean KAFM-CE scores with ITE experience. We evaluated the correlation and the positive predictive value (PPV) of ITE for the multiple choice question (MCQ) scores of 1st written test & 2nd slide examination, the total clinical practice examination scores, and the total sum of 2nd test.
RESULTS: 275 out of 372 residents completed ITE. Those who completed ITE had significantly higher MCQ scores of 1st written test than those who did not. The correlation of ITE scores with 1st written MCQ (0.627) was found to be the highest among the other kinds of CE. The PPV of the ITE score for 1st written MCQ scores was 0.672. The PPV of the ITE score ranged from 0.376 to 0.502.
CONCLUSION: The score of the KAFM ITE has acceptable positive predictive value that could be used as a part of comprehensive evaluation system for residents in cognitive field.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Certification Examination; Clinical Practice Examination; In-Training Examination; Multiple Choice Question; Positive Predictive Value

Year:  2011        PMID: 22745873      PMCID: PMC3383146          DOI: 10.4082/kjfm.2011.32.6.352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Fam Med        ISSN: 2005-6443


  10 in total

1.  Passing the Boards: can USMLE and Orthopaedic in-Training Examination scores predict passage of the ABOS Part-I examination?

Authors:  Gregg R Klein; Matthew S Austin; Susan Randolph; Peter F Sharkey; Alan S Hilibrand
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Assessing the predictive value of the American Board of Family Practice In-training Examination.

Authors:  William H Replogle; William D Johnson
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.756

3.  Validity of the in-training examination for predicting American Board of Internal Medicine certifying examination scores.

Authors:  R S Grossman; R M Fincher; R D Layne; C B Seelig; L R Berkowitz; M A Levine
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  The predictive validity of the internal medicine in-training examination.

Authors:  Stewart F Babbott; B W Beasley; K T Hinchey; J W Blotzer; E S Holmboe
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  [Correlation of In-training Examination Score with the Residency Program or the Score of the Board Examination of Laboratory Medicine.].

Authors:  Jungwon Huh; Jongwan Kim; Jongwoo Park; Hyunok Kim
Journal:  Korean J Lab Med       Date:  2006-06

6.  The in-training examination: an analysis of its predictive value on performance on the general pediatrics certification examination.

Authors:  Linda A Althouse; Gail A McGuinness
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 4.406

7.  The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance.

Authors:  G E Miller
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  Predictive validity of the American Board of Family Practice In-Training Examination.

Authors:  T M Leigh; T P Johnson; N J Pisacano
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  Performance on ABA-ASA in-training examination predicts success for RCPSC certification. American Board of Anesthesiology-American Society of Anesthesiologists. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada.

Authors:  R A Kearney; P Sullivan; E Skakun
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.063

10.  Clinical performance examination utilizing standardized patients in board examination: based on the board examination of korean neurological association for three years.

Authors:  Beom Joon Kim; Jung Joon Sung; Hoon Ki Park; Dae Won Seo; Chin Sang Chung; Byung Woo Yoon
Journal:  Korean J Med Educ       Date:  2011-06-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.