CONTEXT: A broad spectrum of GnRH-deficient phenotypes has been identified in individuals with both mono- and biallelic GNRHR mutations. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine the correlation between the severity of the reproductive phenotype(s) and the number and functional severity of rare sequence variants in GNRHR. SUBJECTS: Eight hundred sixty-three probands with different forms of GnRH deficiency, 46 family members and 422 controls were screened for GNRHR mutations. The 70 subjects (32 patients and 38 family members) harboring mutations were divided into four groups (G1-G4) based on the functional severity of the mutations (complete or partial loss of function) and the number of affected alleles (monoallelic or biallelic) with mutations, and these classes were mapped on their clinical phenotypes. RESULTS: The prevalence of heterozygous rare sequence variants in GNRHR was significantly higher in probands vs. controls (P < 0.01). Among the G1-G3 groups (homozygous subjects with successively decreasing severity and number of mutations), the hypogonadotropic phenotype related to their genetic load. In contrast, subjects in G4, with only monoallelic mutations, demonstrated a greater diversity of clinical phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with GnRH deficiency and biallelic mutations in GNRHR, genetic burden defined by severity and dose is associated with clinical phenotype. In contrast, for patients with monoallelic GNRHR mutations this correlation does not hold. Taken together, these data indicate that as-yet-unidentified genetic and/or environmental factors may combine with singly mutated GNRHR alleles to produce reproductive phenotypes.
CONTEXT: A broad spectrum of GnRH-deficient phenotypes has been identified in individuals with both mono- and biallelic GNRHR mutations. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine the correlation between the severity of the reproductive phenotype(s) and the number and functional severity of rare sequence variants in GNRHR. SUBJECTS: Eight hundred sixty-three probands with different forms of GnRH deficiency, 46 family members and 422 controls were screened for GNRHR mutations. The 70 subjects (32 patients and 38 family members) harboring mutations were divided into four groups (G1-G4) based on the functional severity of the mutations (complete or partial loss of function) and the number of affected alleles (monoallelic or biallelic) with mutations, and these classes were mapped on their clinical phenotypes. RESULTS: The prevalence of heterozygous rare sequence variants in GNRHR was significantly higher in probands vs. controls (P < 0.01). Among the G1-G3 groups (homozygous subjects with successively decreasing severity and number of mutations), the hypogonadotropic phenotype related to their genetic load. In contrast, subjects in G4, with only monoallelic mutations, demonstrated a greater diversity of clinical phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with GnRH deficiency and biallelic mutations in GNRHR, genetic burden defined by severity and dose is associated with clinical phenotype. In contrast, for patients with monoallelic GNRHR mutations this correlation does not hold. Taken together, these data indicate that as-yet-unidentified genetic and/or environmental factors may combine with singly mutated GNRHR alleles to produce reproductive phenotypes.
Authors: L C Layman; D P Cohen; M Jin; J Xie; Z Li; R H Reindollar; S Bolbolan; D P Bick; R R Sherins; L W Duck; L C Musgrove; J C Sellers; J D Neill Journal: Nat Genet Date: 1998-01 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Kimberly H Cox; Luciana M B Oliveira; Lacey Plummer; Braden Corbin; Thomas Gardella; Ravikumar Balasubramanian; William F Crowley Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2018-01-15 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: M I Stamou; P Varnavas; M Kentrou; F Adamidou; A Voutetakis; J Jing; L Plummer; V Koika; N A Georgopoulos Journal: Eur J Endocrinol Date: 2016-11-24 Impact factor: 6.664
Authors: Shuyun Rao; Kathy Q Cai; Jason E Stadanlick; Noa Greenberg-Kushnir; Nehal Solanki-Patel; Sang-Yun Lee; Shawn P Fahl; Joseph R Testa; David L Wiest Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2016-04-05 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Brent S Abel; Natalie D Shaw; Jenifer M Brown; Judith M Adams; Teresa Alati; Kathryn A Martin; Nelly Pitteloud; Stephanie B Seminara; Lacey Plummer; Duarte Pignatelli; William F Crowley; Corrine K Welt; Janet E Hall Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2013-01-22 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Valerie F Sidhoum; Yee-Ming Chan; Margaret F Lippincott; Ravikumar Balasubramanian; Richard Quinton; Lacey Plummer; Andrew Dwyer; Nelly Pitteloud; Frances J Hayes; Janet E Hall; Kathryn A Martin; Paul A Boepple; Stephanie B Seminara Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2013-01-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Daiane Beneduzzi; Ericka B Trarbach; Le Min; Alexander A L Jorge; Heraldo M Garmes; Alessandra Covallero Renk; Marta Fichna; Piotr Fichna; Karina A Arantes; Elaine M F Costa; Anna Zhang; Oluwaseun Adeola; Junping Wen; Rona S Carroll; Berenice B Mendonça; Ursula B Kaiser; Ana Claudia Latronico; Letícia F G Silveira Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2014-07-10 Impact factor: 7.329