Literature DB >> 29161432

Modeling mutant/wild-type interactions to ascertain pathogenicity of PROKR2 missense variants in patients with isolated GnRH deficiency.

Kimberly H Cox1, Luciana M B Oliveira2, Lacey Plummer1, Braden Corbin3, Thomas Gardella3, Ravikumar Balasubramanian1, William F Crowley1.   

Abstract

A major challenge in human genetics is the validation of pathogenicity of heterozygous missense variants. This problem is well-illustrated by PROKR2 variants associated with Isolated GnRH Deficiency (IGD). Homozygous, loss of function variants in PROKR2 was initially implicated in autosomal recessive IGD; however, most IGD-associated PROKR2 variants are heterozygous. Moreover, while IGD patient cohorts are enriched for PROKR2 missense variants similar rare variants are also found in normal individuals. To elucidate the pathogenic mechanisms distinguishing IGD-associated PROKR2 variants from rare variants in controls, we assessed 59 variants using three approaches: (i) in silico prediction, (ii) traditional in vitro functional assays across three signaling pathways with mutant-alone transfections, and (iii) modified in vitro assays with mutant and wild-type expression constructs co-transfected to model in vivo heterozygosity. We found that neither in silico analyses nor traditional in vitro assessments of mutants transfected alone could distinguish IGD variants from control variants. However, in vitro co-transfections revealed that 15/34 IGD variants caused loss-of-function (LoF), including 3 novel dominant-negatives, while only 4/25 control variants caused LoF. Surprisingly, 19 IGD-associated variants were benign or exhibited LoF that could be rescued by WT co-transfection. Overall, variants that were LoF in ≥ 2 signaling assays under co-transfection conditions were more likely to be disease-associated than benign or 'rescuable' variants. Our findings suggest that in vitro modeling of WT/Mutant interactions increases the resolution for identifying causal variants, uncovers novel dominant negative mutations, and provides new insights into the pathogenic mechanisms underlying heterozygous PROKR2 variants.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29161432      PMCID: PMC5886255          DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddx404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mol Genet        ISSN: 0964-6906            Impact factor:   6.150


  76 in total

1.  Large-scale analysis of non-synonymous coding region single nucleotide polymorphisms.

Authors:  Robert J Clifford; Michael N Edmonson; Cu Nguyen; Kenneth H Buetow
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-01-29       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  An ancient founder mutation in PROKR2 impairs human reproduction.

Authors:  Magdalena Avbelj Stefanija; Marc Jeanpierre; Gerasimos P Sykiotis; Jacques Young; Richard Quinton; Ana Paula Abreu; Lacey Plummer; Margaret G Au; Ravikumar Balasubramanian; Andrew A Dwyer; Jose C Florez; Timothy Cheetham; Simon H Pearce; Radhika Purushothaman; Albert Schinzel; Michel Pugeat; Elka E Jacobson-Dickman; Svetlana Ten; Ana Claudia Latronico; James F Gusella; Catherine Dode; William F Crowley; Nelly Pitteloud
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  Mutation analyses in pedigrees and sporadic cases of ethnic Han Chinese Kallmann syndrome patients.

Authors:  Wei-Jun Gu; Qian Zhang; Ying-Qian Wang; Guo-Qing Yang; Tian-Pei Hong; Da-Long Zhu; Jin-Kui Yang; Guang Ning; Nan Jin; Kang Chen; Li Zang; An-Ping Wang; Jin Du; Xian-Ling Wang; Li-Juan Yang; Jian-Ming Ba; Zhao-Hui Lv; Jing-Tao Dou; Yi-Ming Mu
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2015-06-01

Review 4.  Chaperoning G protein-coupled receptors: from cell biology to therapeutics.

Authors:  Ya-Xiong Tao; P Michael Conn
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 19.871

5.  Performance of mutation pathogenicity prediction methods on missense variants.

Authors:  Janita Thusberg; Ayodeji Olatubosun; Mauno Vihinen
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 4.878

6.  PATH-SCAN: a reporting tool for identifying clinically actionable variants.

Authors:  Roxana Daneshjou; Zachary Zappala; Kim Kukurba; Sean M Boyle; Kelly E Ormond; Teri E Klein; Michael Snyder; Carlos D Bustamante; Russ B Altman; Stephen B Montgomery
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2014

7.  Biased signaling through G-protein-coupled PROKR2 receptors harboring missense mutations.

Authors:  Oualid Sbai; Carine Monnier; Catherine Dodé; Jean-Philippe Pin; Jean-Pierre Hardelin; Philippe Rondard
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  SIMPLEX: cloud-enabled pipeline for the comprehensive analysis of exome sequencing data.

Authors:  Maria Fischer; Rene Snajder; Stephan Pabinger; Andreas Dander; Anna Schossig; Johannes Zschocke; Zlatko Trajanoski; Gernot Stocker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  SNP calling, genotype calling, and sample allele frequency estimation from New-Generation Sequencing data.

Authors:  Rasmus Nielsen; Thorfinn Korneliussen; Anders Albrechtsen; Yingrui Li; Jun Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes.

Authors:  Goncalo R Abecasis; Adam Auton; Lisa D Brooks; Mark A DePristo; Richard M Durbin; Robert E Handsaker; Hyun Min Kang; Gabor T Marth; Gil A McVean
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  7 in total

1.  Genetic analysis of adult Slovenian patients with combined pituitary hormone deficiency.

Authors:  Katica Bajuk Studen; Magdalena Avbelj Stefanija; Alexandru Saveanu; Anne Barlier; Thierry Brue; Marija Pfeifer
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 2.  Prokineticin-Receptor Network: Mechanisms of Regulation.

Authors:  Roberta Lattanzi; Rossella Miele
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-25

Review 3.  Genetics of congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: peculiarities and phenotype of an oligogenic disease.

Authors:  Richard Quinton; Marco Bonomi; Biagio Cangiano; Du Soon Swee
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2020-03-21       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 4.  Genetic Evaluation of Patients With Delayed Puberty and Congenital Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism: Is it Worthy of Consideration?

Authors:  Adalgisa Festa; Giuseppina Rosaria Umano; Emanuele Miraglia Del Giudice; Anna Grandone
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 5.555

5.  Clinical, hormonal, and genetic characteristics of 25 Chinese patients with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.

Authors:  Qingxu Liu; Xiaoqin Yin; Pin Li
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.263

6.  Novel Genomic Variants, Atypical Phenotypes and Evidence of a Digenic/Oligogenic Contribution to Disorders/Differences of Sex Development in a Large North African Cohort.

Authors:  Housna Zidoune; Asmahane Ladjouze; Djalila Chellat-Rezgoune; Asma Boukri; Scheher Aman Dib; Nassim Nouri; Meryem Tebibel; Karima Sifi; Noureddine Abadi; Dalila Satta; Yasmina Benelmadani; Joelle Bignon-Topalovic; Maeva El-Zaiat-Munsch; Anu Bashamboo; Ken McElreavey
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Whole exome sequencing and trio analysis to broaden the variant spectrum of genes in idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.

Authors:  Jian Zhang; Shu-Yan Tang; Xiao-Bin Zhu; Peng Li; Jian-Qi Lu; Jiang-Shan Cong; Ling-Bo Wang; Feng Zhang; Zheng Li
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2021 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.