Literature DB >> 21846757

Mammographic screening and "overdiagnosis".

Daniel B Kopans1, Robert A Smith, Stephen W Duffy.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21846757     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11110716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


× No keyword cloud information.
  16 in total

Review 1.  Breast screening review--a radiologist's perspective.

Authors:  M J Michell
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Diagnostic underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ at percutaneous core needle and vacuum-assisted biopsies of the breast in a Brazilian reference institution.

Authors:  Gustavo Machado Badan; Decio Roveda Júnior; Sebastião Piato; Eduardo de Faria Castro Fleury; Mário Sérgio Dantas Campos; Carlos Alberto Ferreira Pecci; Felipe Augusto Trocoli Ferreira; Camila D'Ávila
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

3.  Mortality and recurrence patterns of breast cancer patients diagnosed under a screening programme versus comparable non-screened breast cancer patients from the same population: analytical survey from 2002 to 2012.

Authors:  A García Fernández; C Chabrera; M García Font; M Fraile; J M Lain; S Gónzalez; C Corral; M Torras; J Torres; M Teixido; I Barco; R López; C Gónzalez; A Pessarrodona; N Giménez
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-10-09

4.  Arguments against mammography screening continue to be based on faulty science.

Authors:  Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-02

5.  Benefits and harms of mammography screening after age 74 years: model estimates of overdiagnosis.

Authors:  Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Natasha K Stout; Clyde B Schechter; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Oguzhan Alagoz; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Comparison between two-dimensional synthetic mammography reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography for the detection of T1 breast cancer.

Authors:  Ji Soo Choi; Boo-Kyung Han; Eun Young Ko; Eun Sook Ko; Soo Yeon Hahn; Jung Hee Shin; Min Jung Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Screening for breast cancer in 2018-what should we be doing today?

Authors:  J M Seely; T Alhassan
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 3.677

8.  Assessing the effect of a true-positive recall case in screening mammography: does perceptual priming alter radiologists' performance?

Authors:  S J Lewis; C R Mello-Thoms; P C Brennan; W Lee; A Tan; M F McEntee; M Evanoff; M Pietrzyk; W M Reed
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  [Limits of mammography screening: current controversies and perspectives].

Authors:  K Hellerhoff
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 0.635

10.  Do not jump too quickly to conclusions.

Authors:  Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.