Literature DB >> 22745128

Conformational changes in inositol 1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate 2-kinase upon substrate binding: role of N-terminal lobe and enantiomeric substrate preference.

José Ignacio Baños-Sanz1, Julia Sanz-Aparicio, Hayley Whitfield, Chris Hamilton, Charles A Brearley, Beatriz González.   

Abstract

Inositol 1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate 2-kinase (IP(5) 2-K) catalyzes the synthesis of inositol 1,2,3,4,5,6-hexakisphosphate from ATP and IP(5). Inositol 1,2,3,4,5,6-hexakisphosphate is implicated in crucial processes such as mRNA export, DNA editing, and phosphorus storage in plants. We previously solved the first structure of an IP(5) 2-K, which shed light on aspects of substrate recognition. However, failure of IP(5) 2-K to crystallize in the absence of inositide prompted us to study putative conformational changes upon substrate binding. We have made mutations to residues on a region of the protein that produces a clasp over the active site. A W129A mutant allowed us to capture IP(5) 2-K in its different conformations by crystallography. Thus, the IP(5) 2-K apo-form structure displays an open conformation, whereas the nucleotide-bound form shows a half-closed conformation, in contrast to the inositide-bound form obtained previously in a closed conformation. Both nucleotide and inositide binding produce large conformational changes that can be understood as two rigid domain movements, although local changes were also observed. Changes in intrinsic fluorescence upon nucleotide and inositide binding are in agreement with the crystallographic findings. Our work suggests that the clasp might be involved in enzyme kinetics, with the N-terminal lobe being essential for inositide binding and subsequent conformational changes. We also show how IP(5) 2-K discriminates between inositol 1,3,4,5-tetrakisphosphate and 3,4,5,6-tetrakisphosphate enantiomers and that substrate preference can be manipulated by Arg(130) mutation. Altogether, these results provide a framework for rational design of specific inhibitors with potential applications as biological tools for in vivo studies, which could assist in the identification of novel roles for IP(5) 2-K in mammals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22745128      PMCID: PMC3436203          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M112.363671

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  52 in total

1.  Inositol 1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate 2-kinase is a distant IPK member with a singular inositide binding site for axial 2-OH recognition.

Authors:  Beatriz González; Jose Ignacio Baños-Sanz; Maider Villate; Charles Alistair Brearley; Julia Sanz-Aparicio
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The ABCs of low-phytate crops.

Authors:  Victor Raboy
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Inositol phosphate-induced stabilization of inositol 1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate 2-kinase and its role in substrate specificity.

Authors:  Varin Gosein; Ting-Fung Leung; Oren Krajden; Gregory J Miller
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Biochemical and functional characterization of inositol 1,3,4,5, 6-pentakisphosphate 2-kinases.

Authors:  E B Ives; J Nichols; S R Wente; J D York
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-11-24       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  iMOSFLM: a new graphical interface for diffraction-image processing with MOSFLM.

Authors:  T Geoff G Battye; Luke Kontogiannis; Owen Johnson; Harold R Powell; Andrew G W Leslie
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2011-03-18

6.  Purification and some properties of inositol 1,3,4,5,6-Pentakisphosphate 2-kinase from immature soybean seeds.

Authors:  B Q Phillippy; A H Ullah; K C Ehrlich
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1994-11-11       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Arabidopsis inositol polyphosphate 6-/3-kinase is a nuclear protein that complements a yeast mutant lacking a functional ArgR-Mcm1 transcription complex.

Authors:  Hui-Jun Xia; Charles Brearley; Stephan Elge; Boaz Kaplan; Hillel Fromm; Bernd Mueller-Roeber
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 8.  Scaling and assessment of data quality.

Authors:  Philip Evans
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2005-12-14

Review 9.  Inositol pyrophosphates: metabolism and signaling.

Authors:  M Bennett; S M N Onnebo; C Azevedo; A Saiardi
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 9.261

10.  Phaser crystallographic software.

Authors:  Airlie J McCoy; Ralf W Grosse-Kunstleve; Paul D Adams; Martyn D Winn; Laurent C Storoni; Randy J Read
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 3.304

View more
  7 in total

1.  Crystallization and Preliminary X-Ray Diffraction Analysis of a Mammal Inositol 1,3,4,5,6-Pentakisphosphate 2-Kinase.

Authors:  Elsa Franco-Echevarría; Julia Sanz-Aparicio; Nathalie Troffer-Charlier; Arnaud Poterszman; Beatriz González
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.371

2.  Conformational stability of inositol 1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate 2-kinase (IPK1) dictates its substrate selectivity.

Authors:  Varin Gosein; Gregory J Miller
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Roles of phosphate recognition in inositol 1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate 2-kinase (IPK1) substrate binding and activation.

Authors:  Varin Gosein; Gregory J Miller
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  The crystal structure of mammalian inositol 1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate 2-kinase reveals a new zinc-binding site and key features for protein function.

Authors:  Elsa Franco-Echevarría; Julia Sanz-Aparicio; Charles A Brearley; Juana M González-Rubio; Beatriz González
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Simple synthesis of 32P-labelled inositol hexakisphosphates for study of phosphate transformations.

Authors:  Hayley Whitfield; Andrew M Riley; Soulla Diogenous; Himali Y Godage; Barry V L Potter; Charles A Brearley
Journal:  Plant Soil       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 4.192

6.  Inositol hexakisphosphate biosynthesis underpins PAMP-triggered immunity to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato in Arabidopsis thaliana but is dispensable for establishment of systemic acquired resistance.

Authors:  Jacquelyne S Y Poon; Ruth E Le Fevre; John P Carr; David E Hanke; Alex M Murphy
Journal:  Mol Plant Pathol       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 5.663

7.  An ATP-responsive metabolic cassette comprised of inositol tris/tetrakisphosphate kinase 1 (ITPK1) and inositol pentakisphosphate 2-kinase (IPK1) buffers diphosphosphoinositol phosphate levels.

Authors:  Hayley Whitfield; Gaye White; Colleen Sprigg; Andrew M Riley; Barry V L Potter; Andrew M Hemmings; Charles A Brearley
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.857

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.