PURPOSE: To validate an algorithm based upon International Classification of Diseases, 9(th) revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) documented within the Mini-Sentinel Distributed Database (MSDD). METHODS: Using an ICD-9-CM-based algorithm (hospitalized patients with 410.x0 or 410.x1 in primary position), we identified a random sample of potential cases of AMI in 2009 from four Data Partners participating in the Mini-Sentinel Program. Cardiologist reviewers used information abstracted from hospital records to assess the likelihood of an AMI diagnosis based on criteria from the Joint European Society of Cardiology and American College of Cardiology Global Task Force. Positive predictive values (PPVs) of the ICD-9-based algorithm were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 153 potential cases of AMI identified, hospital records for 143 (93%) were retrieved and abstracted. Overall, the PPV was 86.0% (95% confidence interval; 79.2%, 91.2%). PPVs ranged from 76.3% to 94.3% across the four Data Partners. CONCLUSIONS: The overall PPV of potential AMI cases, as identified using an ICD-9-CM-based algorithm, may be acceptable for safety surveillance; however, PPVs do vary across Data Partners. This validation effort provides a contemporary estimate of the reliability of this algorithm for use in future surveillance efforts conducted using the Food and Drug Administration's MSDD.
PURPOSE: To validate an algorithm based upon International Classification of Diseases, 9(th) revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) documented within the Mini-Sentinel Distributed Database (MSDD). METHODS: Using an ICD-9-CM-based algorithm (hospitalized patients with 410.x0 or 410.x1 in primary position), we identified a random sample of potential cases of AMI in 2009 from four Data Partners participating in the Mini-Sentinel Program. Cardiologist reviewers used information abstracted from hospital records to assess the likelihood of an AMI diagnosis based on criteria from the Joint European Society of Cardiology and American College of Cardiology Global Task Force. Positive predictive values (PPVs) of the ICD-9-based algorithm were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 153 potential cases of AMI identified, hospital records for 143 (93%) were retrieved and abstracted. Overall, the PPV was 86.0% (95% confidence interval; 79.2%, 91.2%). PPVs ranged from 76.3% to 94.3% across the four Data Partners. CONCLUSIONS: The overall PPV of potential AMI cases, as identified using an ICD-9-CM-based algorithm, may be acceptable for safety surveillance; however, PPVs do vary across Data Partners. This validation effort provides a contemporary estimate of the reliability of this algorithm for use in future surveillance efforts conducted using the Food and Drug Administration's MSDD.
Authors: J David Curb; Anne McTiernan; Susan R Heckbert; Charles Kooperberg; Janet Stanford; Michael Nevitt; Karen C Johnson; Lori Proulx-Burns; Lisa Pastore; Michael Criqui; Sandra Daugherty Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Russell V Luepker; Fred S Apple; Robert H Christenson; Richard S Crow; Stephen P Fortmann; David Goff; Robert J Goldberg; Mary M Hand; Allan S Jaffe; Desmond G Julian; Daniel Levy; Teri Manolio; Shanthi Mendis; George Mensah; Andrzej Pajak; Ronald J Prineas; K Srinath Reddy; Veronique L Roger; Wayne D Rosamond; Eyal Shahar; A Richey Sharrett; Paul Sorlie; Hugh Tunstall-Pedoe Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-11-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Sarah L Cutrona; Sengwee Toh; Aarthi Iyer; Sarah Foy; Elizabeth Cavagnaro; Susan Forrow; Judith A Racoosin; Robert Goldberg; Jerry H Gurwitz Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Daniel H Solomon; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Robert J Glynn; Yuka Kiyota; Raisa Levin; Helen Mogun; Jerry Avorn Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-04-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Yuka Kiyota; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Robert J Glynn; Carolyn C Cannuscio; Jerry Avorn; Daniel H Solomon Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Rachel L Richesson; W Ed Hammond; Meredith Nahm; Douglas Wixted; Gregory E Simon; Jennifer G Robinson; Alan E Bauck; Denise Cifelli; Michelle M Smerek; John Dickerson; Reesa L Laws; Rosemary A Madigan; Shelley A Rusincovitch; Cynthia Kluchar; Robert M Califf Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-08-16 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Montika Bush; Til Stürmer; Sally C Stearns; Ross J Simpson; M Alan Brookhart; Wayne Rosamond; Anna M Kucharska-Newton Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2018-02-06 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Loreen Straub; Joshua J Gagne; Judith C Maro; Michael D Nguyen; Nicolas Beaulieu; Jeffrey S Brown; Adee Kennedy; Margaret Johnson; Adam Wright; Li Zhou; Shirley V Wang Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Vincent Lo Re; Kevin Haynes; David Goldberg; Kimberly A Forde; Dena M Carbonari; Kimberly B F Leidl; Sean Hennessy; K Rajender Reddy; Pamala A Pawloski; Gregory W Daniel; T Craig Cheetham; Aarthi Iyer; Kara O Coughlin; Sengwee Toh; Denise M Boudreau; Nandini Selvam; William O Cooper; Mano S Selvan; Jeffrey J VanWormer; Mark I Avigan; Monika Houstoun; Gwen L Zornberg; Judith A Racoosin; Azadeh Shoaibi Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2013-06-25 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Marc Rosenman; Jinghua He; Joel Martin; Kavitha Nutakki; George Eckert; Kathleen Lane; Irmina Gradus-Pizlo; Siu L Hui Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-10-10 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: James S Floyd; Robert Wellman; Sharon Fuller; Nisha Bansal; Bruce M Psaty; Ian H de Boer; Delia Scholes Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2016-08-09 Impact factor: 8.237