Literature DB >> 15096449

Relationship between selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and acute myocardial infarction in older adults.

Daniel H Solomon1, Sebastian Schneeweiss, Robert J Glynn, Yuka Kiyota, Raisa Levin, Helen Mogun, Jerry Avorn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors (coxibs) were developed to cause less gastrointestinal hemorrhage than nonselective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), there has been concern about their cardiovascular safety. We studied the relative risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) among users of celecoxib, rofecoxib, and NSAIDs in Medicare beneficiaries with a comprehensive drug benefit. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We conducted a matched case-control study of 54 475 patients 65 years of age or older who received their medications through 2 state-sponsored pharmaceutical benefits programs in the United States. All healthcare use encounters were examined to identify hospitalizations for AMI. Each of the 10 895 cases of AMI was matched to 4 controls on the basis of age, gender, and the month of index date. We constructed matched logistic regression models including indicators for patient demographics, healthcare use, medication use, and cardiovascular risk factors to assess the relative risk of AMI in patients who used rofecoxib compared with persons taking no NSAID, taking celecoxib, or taking NSAIDs. Current use of rofecoxib was associated with an elevated relative risk of AMI compared with celecoxib (odds ratio [OR], 1.24; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.46; P=0.011) and with no NSAID (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.31; P=0.054). The adjusted relative risk of AMI was also elevated in dose-specific comparisons: rofecoxib < or =25 mg versus celecoxib < or =200 mg (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.44; P=0.036) and rofecoxib >25 mg versus celecoxib >200 mg (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.07 to 2.71; P=0.026). The adjusted relative risks of AMI associated with rofecoxib use of 1 to 30 days (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.75; P=0.005) and 31 to 90 days (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.72; P=0.003) were higher than >90 days (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.25; P=0.8) compared with celecoxib use of similar duration. Celecoxib was not associated with an increased relative risk of AMI in these comparisons.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, current rofecoxib use was associated with an elevated relative risk of AMI compared with celecoxib use and no NSAID use. Dosages of rofecoxib >25 mg were associated with a higher risk than dosages < or =25 mg. The risk was elevated in the first 90 days of use but not thereafter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15096449     DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000127578.21885.3E

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  98 in total

Review 1.  Study designs in paediatric pharmacoepidemiology.

Authors:  Katia Verhamme; Miriam Sturkenboom
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Randomized controlled trials of COX-2 inhibitors: an analysis of doses used and trends over time to investigate implications for comparative safety.

Authors:  Gudrun Stefansdottir; Marie L De Bruin; Mirjam J Knol; Diederick E Grobbee; Hubert G M Leufkens
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Transparency and Reproducibility of Observational Cohort Studies Using Large Healthcare Databases.

Authors:  S V Wang; P Verpillat; J A Rassen; A Patrick; E M Garry; D B Bartels
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Effectiveness of polymer-coated extended-release morphine sulfate capsules in older patients with persistent moderate-to-severe pain: A subgroup analysis of a large, open-label, community-based trial.

Authors:  John Sasaki; Arnold J Weil; Edgar L Ross; Bruce D Nicholson
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2007-05

5.  A comparison of reported gastrointestinal and thromboembolic events between rofecoxib and celecoxib using observational data.

Authors:  Rachna Kasliwal; Deborah Layton; Scott Harris; Lynda Wilton; Saad A W Shakir
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 6.  Biological basis for the cardiovascular consequences of COX-2 inhibition: therapeutic challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Tilo Grosser; Susanne Fries; Garret A FitzGerald
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Coxibs and cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  Michal R Pijak; Igor Huzicka; Frantisek Gazdik
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 8.  Reciprocal regulation of the nitric oxide and cyclooxygenase pathway in pathophysiology: relevance and clinical implications.

Authors:  Daniela Salvemini; Sangwon F Kim; Vincenzo Mollace
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 9.  [Treatment of chronic pain in the internist's practice].

Authors:  W Köster
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 10.  Celecoxib: a review of its use in the management of arthritis and acute pain.

Authors:  James E Frampton; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.