Literature DB >> 22744901

Robotic assisted versus pure microsurgical vasectomy reversal: technique and prospective database control trial.

Sijo J Parekattil1, Ahmet Gudeloglu, Jamin Brahmbhatt, Jessica Wharton, Karen B Priola.   

Abstract

Microsurgical vasectomy reversal is a technically demanding procedure. Previous studies have shown the possible benefit of robotic assistance during such procedures. Our goal was to compare robotic assisted vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy to standard microsurgical vasovasostomy (MVV) and vasoepididymostomy (MVE). The use of robotic assistance for vasectomy reversal may provide the microsurgeon with improved visualization, elimination of tremor, and decreased fatigue and obviate the need for a skilled microsurgical assistant. This study provides the first clinical prospective control trial of robotic assisted versus pure microsurgical vasectomy reversal. The use of robotic assistance in microsurgical vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy may have benefit over MVV and MVE with regards to decreasing operative duration and improving the rate of recovery of postoperative total motile sperm counts based on our study. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22744901     DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1315788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg        ISSN: 0743-684X            Impact factor:   2.873


  18 in total

1.  Robotic intra-abdominal vasectomy reversal: A new approach to a difficult problem.

Authors:  Yagil Barazani; Jihad Kaouk; Edmund S Sabanegh
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Robot-assisted vasovasostomy using a single layer anastomosis.

Authors:  Michael T Marshall; Alexander D Doudt; Jonathan H Berger; Brian K Auge; Matthew S Christman; Chong H Choe
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-11-07

Review 3.  Robotic assisted andrological surgery.

Authors:  Sijo J Parekattil; Ahmet Gudeloglu
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 4.  The evolution and refinement of vasoepididymostomy techniques.

Authors:  Peter T Chan
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 5.  Current status of vasectomy reversal.

Authors:  J Ullrich Schwarzer; Heiko Steinfatt
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Intra-abdominal robot-assisted vasovasostomy of obstructive azoospermia in an Asian population following multiple bilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy in childhood: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Zhe Yu; Zhuo Liu; Xiaming Liu; Mingchao Li; Longjie Gu; Ruzhu Lan; Shaogang Wang; Jun Yang; Jihong Liu
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-06

7.  Commentary on "validation of robot-assisted vasectomy reversal" by Dr. Parviz K Kavoussi.

Authors:  Sijo J Parekattil
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

8.  Multiple advanced surgical techniques to treat acquired seminal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Hong-Tao Jiang; Qian Yuan; Yu Liu; Zeng-Qin Liu; Zhen-Yu Zhou; Ke-Feng Xiao; Jiang-Gen Yang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 9.  Vasectomy reversal: a clinical update.

Authors:  Abhishek P Patel; Ryan P Smith
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 10.  Surgical management of male infertility: an update.

Authors:  Monica Velasquez; Cigdem Tanrikut
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2014-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.