Literature DB >> 22743867

Postmastectomy breast reconstruction in the irradiated breast: a comparative study of DIEP and latissimus dorsi flap outcome.

Anna Lindegren1, Martin Halle, Ann-Charlott Docherty Skogh, Åsa Edsander-Nord.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Autologous tissue transfer is often indicated to achieve improved tissue quality during breast reconstruction after radiotherapy. The authors evaluated satisfaction with postmastectomy breast reconstruction among irradiated patients. The aim was to compare deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) and latissimus dorsi flaps regarding satisfaction with aesthetic outcome between patients and plastic surgeons.
METHODS: Patients who underwent reconstruction with 24 consecutive DIEP flaps and 21 consecutive latissimus dorsi flaps in combination with prostheses were reviewed retrospectively. They received the Michigan Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey and a complementary form regarding patient satisfaction. They were photographed, and aesthetic results were evaluated by an independent board of plastic surgeons.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups regarding demographic data or 36-Item Short Form Health Survey results. Plastic surgeons found the DIEP flap superior regarding size (p = 0.024) and shape (p = 0.039), whereas patients were more satisfied with the size (p = 0.046) and shape (p = 0.017) of the latissimus dorsi flap when patients' and surgeons' opinions were compared. Discrepancy between patients' and surgeons' opinions was verified with weighted kappa analysis. Regarding the donor scar, the latissimus dorsi flap was favored compared with DIEP flap reconstruction by both patients (p = 0.036) and surgeons (p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: There is a difference between patients' and plastic surgeons' opinions regarding breast reconstruction outcomes in the irradiated breast. The patients were more satisfied with latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction, which may relate to the donor-site scar. Surgeons favored DIEP flap reconstruction with regard to the size and shape of the breast. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22743867     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182547aaf

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  11 in total

1.  Breast Reconstruction After Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Hiroshi Yoshimoto; Rodrigo Hamuy
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  The evolving breast reconstruction: from latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap to a propeller thoracodorsal fasciocutaneous flap.

Authors:  Jørn Bo Thomsen; Gudjon Leifur Gunnarsson
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2014-08

3.  Conservative mastectomies and Immediate-DElayed AutoLogous (IDEAL) breast reconstruction: the DIEP flap.

Authors:  Maximilian Otte; Carolin Nestle-Krämling; Sonia Fertsch; Mazen Hagouan; Beatrix Munder; Philip Richrath; Peter Stambera; Alina Abu-Ghazaleh; Christoph Andree
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-02

4.  Comparison of short-term outcomes between pedicled- and free-flap autologous breast reconstruction: a nationwide inpatient database study in Japan.

Authors:  Ryo Karakawa; Takaaki Konishi; Hidehiko Yoshimatsu; Yuma Fuse; Yohei Hashimoto; Hiroki Matsui; Kiyohide Fushimi; Tomoyuki Yano; Hideo Yasunaga
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 3.307

5.  Differences in breast aesthetic outcomes due to radiation: A validated, quantitative analysis of expander-implant reconstruction.

Authors:  Lauren M Mioton; Jessica Gaido; William Small; Neil A Fine; John Y Kim
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2013

6.  Scar Wars: Preferences in Breast Surgery.

Authors:  Cormac W Joyce; Siun Murphy; Stephen Murphy; Jack L Kelly; Colin M Morrison
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2015-09-15

7.  Tissue Expander versus Tissue Expander and Latissimus Flap in Morbidly Obese Breast Reconstruction Patients.

Authors:  Edward A Luce; Robert L Adams; Robert G Chandler; Joseph Parks
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-04-07

8.  Nummular Eczema of Breast: A Potential Dermatologic Complication after Mastectomy and Subsequent Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Yoshiko Iwahira; Tomohisa Nagasao; Yusuke Shimizu; Kumiko Kuwata; Yoshio Tanaka
Journal:  Plast Surg Int       Date:  2015-08-24

9.  The Type of Breast Reconstruction May Not Influence Patient Satisfaction in the Chinese Population: A Single Institutional Experience.

Authors:  Benlong Yang; Lin Li; Wenhui Yan; Jiaying Chen; Ying Chen; Zhen Hu; Guangyu Liu; Zhenzhou Shen; Zhimin Shao; Jiong Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Combining Autologous and Prosthetic Techniques: The Breast Reconstruction Scale Principle.

Authors:  Salvatore Taglialatela Scafati; Annachiara Cavaliere; Bianca Aceto; Francesco Somma; Luigi Cremone
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-12-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.