Literature DB >> 22742999

Accelerometer as a tool to assess sedentarity and adherence to physical activity recommendations after cardiac rehabilitation program.

T Guiraud1, R Granger, V Gremeaux, M Bousquet, L Richard, L Soukarie, T Babin, M Labrunee, L Bosquet, A Pathak.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To objectively assess, in stable cardiac patients, the adherence to physical activity (PA) recommendations using an accelerometer at 2 or 12 months after the discharge of cardiac rehabilitation program (CRP).
METHODS: Eighty cardiac patients wore an accelerometer at 2 months (group 1, short-term adherence, n = 41) or one-year (group 2, long-term adherence, n = 39) after a CRP including therapeutic education about regular PA. PA was classified as "light" (1.8-2.9 Metabolic Equivalent of Task [METs]), "moderate" (3-5.9 METs), or "intense" (>6 METs). Energy expenditure (EE, in Kcal) and time (min) spent in these three different levels were measured during a one-week period with the MyWellness Key actimeter (MWK). Motivational readiness for change was also assessed at the end of CRP. Patients were considered as physically active when a minimum of 150 min of moderate PA during the one-week period was achieved.
RESULTS: Both groups were comparable, except for exercise capacity at the end of the CRP which was slightly higher in group 1 (167.5 ± 42.3 versus 140.7 ± 46.1 W, P < 0.01). The total weekly active EE averaged 676.7 ± 353.2 kcal and 609.5 ± 433.5 kcal in group 1 and 2, respectively. The time spent within the light-intensity range PA was 319.4 ± 170.9 and 310.9 ± 160.6 min, and the time spent within the moderate-intensity range averaged 157.4 ± 115.4 and 165 ± 77.2 min per week for group 1 and 2, respectively. Fifty-three percent and 41% of patients remained active in both groups respectively.
CONCLUSION: About half of the patients are non-adherent to PA after CRP and do not reach target levels recommended by physicians. The first 2 months following the discharge of CRP seem to be of outmost importance for lifestyle modifications maintenance, and further study monitoring more closely PA decrease could help to clarify the optimal follow-up options.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22742999     DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2012.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Phys Rehabil Med        ISSN: 1877-0657


  8 in total

1.  Correlates of objectively measured physical activity in cardiac patients.

Authors:  Wonwoo Byun; Cemal Ozemek; Katrina Riggin; Scott Strath; Leonard Kaminsky
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-10

Review 2.  Systematic Review of Interventions Designed to Maintain or Increase Physical Activity Post-Cardiac Rehabilitation Phase II.

Authors:  Helen Graham; Kathy Prue-Owens; Jess Kirby; Mythreyi Ramesh
Journal:  Rehabil Process Outcome       Date:  2020-08-25

3.  Assessing the 'active couch potato' phenomenon in cardiac rehabilitation: rationale and study protocol.

Authors:  Nicole Freene; Borja Del Pozo Cruz; Rachel Davey
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Investigation of the Effects of Home-Based Exercise and Cognitive Training on Cognitive and Physical Functions in Cardiac Patients: The COVEPICARDIO Study Protocol of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Florent Besnier; Emma Gabrielle Dupuy; Christine Gagnon; Thomas Vincent; Catherine-Alexandra Grégoire; Caroll-Ann Blanchette; Kathia Saillant; Nadia Bouabdallaoui; Josep Iglésies Grau; Béatrice Bérubé; Miloudza Olmand; Marie-France Marin; Sylvie Belleville; Martin Juneau; Paolo Vitali; Mathieu Gayda; Anil Nigam; Louis Bherer
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-12-06

5.  Digital home-based multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation: How to counteract physical inactivity during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Rita Pinto; Madalena Lemos Pires; Mariana Borges; Mariana Liñan Pinto; Catarina Sousa Guerreiro; Sandra Miguel; Olga Santos; Inês Ricardo; Nelson Cunha; Pedro Alves da Silva; Ana Luísa Correia; Sílvia Fiúza; Edite Caldeira; Fátima Salazar; Carla Rodrigues; Mariana Cordeiro Ferreira; Gisela Afonso; Graça Araújo; Joana Martins; Marta Ramalhinho; Paula Sousa; Susana Pires; Alda Jordão; Fausto J Pinto; Ana Abreu
Journal:  Rev Port Cardiol       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 1.651

6.  Comparison of Different Physical Activity Measures in a Cardiac Rehabilitation Program: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Muaddi Alharbi; Adrian Bauman; Mohammed Alabdulaali; Lis Neubeck; Sidney Smith; Sharon Naismith; Yun-Hee Jeon; Geoffrey Tofler; Atef Surour; Robyn Gallagher
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Support Life Club: A New Model Based on Social Media Group Chats and Social Activities That Can Improve Adherence and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Cardiac Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Sisi Zhang; Houjuan Zuo; Xiaoping Meng; Dayi Hu
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 2.314

8.  Psychometric Features of the Polish Version of TSK Heart in Elderly Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Andrzej Knapik; Józefa Dąbek; Weronika Gallert-Kopyto; Ryszard Plinta; Anna Brzęk
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 2.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.