Literature DB >> 2273888

Kinematic analysis of lip closure in stutterers' fluent speech.

M D McClean1, R M Kroll, N S Loftus.   

Abstract

An analysis of lip and jaw motion was carried out in order to evaluate previous observations on the fluent speech of stutterers and to describe possible effects of speech therapy. A strain gauge system was used to transduce lip and jaw movements during fluent repetitions of "sapapple" in adult stutterers and nonstutterers. Fifteen movement parameters were measured on lip closure for the initial /p/ sound in a group of 10 normal speakers, 10 stutterers who had no recent speech therapy, and 8 stutterers who had been through an intensive speech therapy program involving modification of speech timing. The no-therapy group and nonstutterers did not differ significantly in terms of any movement parameter. Stutterers who had been through speech therapy showed significant increases in jaw movement duration and time to peak velocity of the upper lip, lower lip, and jaw. The expected timing pattern for lip and jaw velocity peaks on lip closure (UL-LL-J) was the most frequently occurring pattern, but deviations from this pattern were observed in both stutterers and nonstutterers. The occurrence of reversals was most prevalent in the therapy group, and it was associated with increases in jaw movement duration across subjects. It is suggested that for the type of movement studied here, anomalies in stutterers' fluent speech are likely to be the result of acquired adjustments rather than properties of the speech neuromotor system that underly dysfluency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2273888     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3304.755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  9 in total

1.  Motor practice effects and sensorimotor integration in adults who stutter: Evidence from visuomotor tracking performance.

Authors:  Victoria Tumanova; Patricia M Zebrowski; Shawn S Goodman; Richard M Arenas
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.538

2.  Attention demands of language production in adults who stutter.

Authors:  Nathan D Maxfield; Wendy L Olsen; Daniel Kleinman; Stefan A Frisch; Victor S Ferreira; Jennifer J Lister
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Spatiotemporal stability and patterning of speech movement sequences.

Authors:  A Smith; L Goffman; H N Zelaznik; G Ying; C McGillem
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  A neural-network model enabling sensorimotor learning: application to the control of arm movements and some implications for speech-motor control and stuttering.

Authors:  K T Kalveram
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1993

5.  Overreliance on auditory feedback may lead to sound/syllable repetitions: simulations of stuttering and fluency-inducing conditions with a neural model of speech production.

Authors:  Oren Civier; Stephen M Tasko; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 2.538

6.  A Lag in Speech Motor Coordination During Sentence Production Is Associated With Stuttering Persistence in Young Children.

Authors:  Evan Usler; Anne Smith; Christine Weber
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Increasing phonological complexity reveals heightened instability in inter-articulatory coordination in adults who stutter.

Authors:  Anne Smith; Neeraja Sadagopan; Bridget Walsh; Christine Weber-Fox
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 2.538

8.  Language and motor abilities of preschool children who stutter: evidence from behavioral and kinematic indices of nonword repetition performance.

Authors:  Anne Smith; Lisa Goffman; Jayanthi Sasisekaran; Christine Weber-Fox
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 2.538

9.  Afferent and efferent aspects of mandibular sensorimotor control in adults who stutter.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Roman A Prokopenko; Ludo Max
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.297

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.