| Literature DB >> 22736957 |
Chao-Wang Young1, Jia-Ling Hsieh, Chyung Ay.
Abstract
This study adopted a microelectromechanical fabrication process to design a chip integrated with electroosmotic flow and dielectrophoresis force for single cell lysis. Human histiocytic lymphoma U937 cells were driven rapidly by electroosmotic flow and precisely moved to a specific area for cell lysis. By varying the frequency of AC power, 15 V AC at 1 MHz of frequency configuration achieved 100% cell lysing at the specific area. The integrated chip could successfully manipulate single cells to a specific position and lysis. The overall successful rate of cell tracking, positioning, and cell lysis is 80%. The average speed of cell driving was 17.74 μm/s. This technique will be developed for DNA extraction in biomolecular detection. It can simplify pre-treatment procedures for biotechnological analysis of samples.Entities:
Keywords: cell lysis; cell manipulation; dielectrophoresis force; electroosmotic flow
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22736957 PMCID: PMC3376563 DOI: 10.3390/s120302400
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1.Diagram of the system configuration.
Figure 2.Panel of the man-machine interface.
Figure 3.Result of image processing.
Figure 4.Diagram of an integrated chip.
Figure 5.Partition of area.
Figure 6.The fuzzy output rule in this control platform.
Figure 7.Fabrication of Pd electrode.
Figure 8.Electroporation potential of external electric field.
Figure 9.Cell driving, positioning and lysis process.
Figure 10.Cell lysis process.
The time and speed of cell lysis.
| No. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 286.14 | 15.19 | 18.83 | o |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | x |
| 3 | 188.36 | 6.1 | 30.87 | o |
| 4 | 1,176.29 | 75.02 | 15.67 | o |
| 5 | 215.23 | 26.12 | 8.24 | o |
| 6 | 1,912.20 | 83 | 23.03 | o |
| 7 | 897.55 | 60.11 | 14.93 | o |
| 8 | 235.03 | 11.2 | 20.98 | o |
| 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | x |
| 10 | 448.64 | 17.04 | 26.32 | o |
| 11 | 1,083.49 | 82.08 | 13.20 | o |
| 12 | 892.32 | 48.23 | 18.50 | o |
| 13 | 976.38 | 93 | 10.49 | o |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | x |
| 15 | 1,643.63 | 87.22 | 18.84 | o |
| 16 | 144.40 | 29.28 | 4.93 | o |
| 17 | 764.32 | 37.22 | 20.54 | o |
| 18 | 816.97 | 28.1 | 29.07 | o |
| 19 | 505.15 | 45.23 | 11.17 | o |
| 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | x |
| 21 | 283.67 | 19.18 | 14.79 | o |
| 22 | 2,791.78 | 93.1 | 29.99 | o |
| 23 | 1,491.36 | 62.19 | 23.98 | o |
| 24 | 174.14 | 42.29 | 4.12 | o |
| 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | x |
| 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | x |
| 27 | 200.68 | 29.12 | 6.89 | o |
| 28 | 848.07 | 32.18 | 26.35 | o |
| 29 | 148.63 | 23.2 | 6.41 | o |
| 30 | 713.90 | 44.18 | 16.16 | o |
| Successful rate: 80.00% | Average speed: 17.74 μm/s | |||
Figure 11.Filament DNA image.