Literature DB >> 18344487

Kinematics and power requirements of ascending and descending flight in the pigeon (Columba livia).

Angela M Berg1, Andrew A Biewener.   

Abstract

Ascending or descending locomotion involves a change in potential energy (PE) and a corresponding change in power requirement. We sought to test whether the mechanical power required for steady ascending or descending flight is a simple sum of the power required for level flight and the power necessary for potential energy change. Pigeons (Columba livia) were trained to fly at varying angles of ascent and descent (60 degrees , 30 degrees , 0 degrees , -30 degrees , -60 degrees ), and were recorded using high-speed video. Detailed three-dimensional kinematics were obtained from the recordings, allowing analysis of wing movement. Aerodynamic forces and power requirements were then estimated from kinematic data. As expected, ;PE flight power' increased significantly with angle of flight (0.234 W deg.(-1)), though there appeared to be a limit on the amount of PE that the birds could gain or dissipate per wingbeat. We found that the total power output for flight at various angles was not different from the sum of power required for level flight and the PE rate of change for a given angle, except for the steep -60 degrees descent. The total power for steep descent was higher than this sum because of a higher induced power due to the bird's deceleration and slower flight velocity. Aerodynamic force estimates during mid-downstroke did not differ significantly in magnitude or orientation among flight angles. Pigeons flew fastest during -30 degrees flights (4.9+/-0.1 m s(-1)) and slowest at 60 degrees (2.9+/-0.1 m s(-1)). Although wingbeat frequency ranged from 6.1 to 9.6 Hz across trials, the variation was not significant across flight angles. Stroke plane angle was more horizontal, and the wing more protracted, for both +60 degrees and -60 degrees flights, compared with other flight path angles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18344487     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.010413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  6 in total

1.  Predicting power-optimal kinematics of avian wings.

Authors:  Ben Parslew
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  The aerodynamic forces and pressure distribution of a revolving pigeon wing.

Authors:  James R Usherwood
Journal:  Exp Fluids       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.480

3.  Interpretation of body-mounted accelerometry in flying animals and estimation of biomechanical power.

Authors:  R J Spivey; C M Bishop
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 4.  The role of wingbeat frequency and amplitude in flight power.

Authors:  Krishnamoorthy Krishnan; Baptiste Garde; Ashley Bennison; Nik C Cole; Emma-L Cole; Jamie Darby; Kyle H Elliott; Adam Fell; Agustina Gómez-Laich; Sophie de Grissac; Mark Jessopp; Emmanouil Lempidakis; Yuichi Mizutani; Aurélien Prudor; Michael Quetting; Flavio Quintana; Hermina Robotka; Alexandre Roulin; Peter G Ryan; Kim Schalcher; Stefan Schoombie; Vikash Tatayah; Fred Tremblay; Henri Weimerskirch; Shannon Whelan; Martin Wikelski; Ken Yoda; Anders Hedenström; Emily L C Shepard
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 4.293

Review 5.  Microglial Morphology Across Distantly Related Species: Phylogenetic, Environmental and Age Influences on Microglia Reactivity and Surveillance States.

Authors:  Dario Carvalho-Paulo; João Bento Torres Neto; Carlos Santos Filho; Thais Cristina Galdino de Oliveira; Aline Andrade de Sousa; Renata Rodrigues Dos Reis; Zaire Alves Dos Santos; Camila Mendes de Lima; Marcus Augusto de Oliveira; Nivin Mazen Said; Sinara Franco Freitas; Marcia Consentino Kronka Sosthenes; Giovanni Freitas Gomes; Ediely Pereira Henrique; Patrick Douglas Côrrea Pereira; Lucas Silva de Siqueira; Mauro André Damasceno de Melo; Cristovam Guerreiro Diniz; Nara Gyzely de Morais Magalhães; José Antonio Picanço Diniz; Pedro Fernando da Costa Vasconcelos; Daniel Guerreiro Diniz; Daniel Clive Anthony; David Francis Sherry; Dora Brites; Cristovam Wanderley Picanço Diniz
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 7.561

6.  Three-dimensional, high-resolution skeletal kinematics of the avian wing and shoulder during ascending flapping flight and uphill flap-running.

Authors:  David B Baier; Stephen M Gatesy; Kenneth P Dial
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.