Literature DB >> 22736454

A standard for test reliability in group research.

Jules L Ellis1.   

Abstract

Many authors adhere to the rule that test reliabilities should be at least .70 or .80 in group research. This article introduces a new standard according to which reliabilities can be evaluated. This standard is based on the costs or time of the experiment and of administering the test. For example, if test administration costs are 7 % of the total experimental costs, the efficient value of the reliability is .93. If the actual reliability of a test is equal to this efficient reliability, the test size maximizes the statistical power of the experiment, given the costs. As a standard in experimental research, it is proposed that the reliability of the dependent variable be close to the efficient reliability. Adhering to this standard will enhance the statistical power and reduce the costs of experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22736454      PMCID: PMC3578733          DOI: 10.3758/s13428-012-0223-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  12 in total

1.  Beyond the Spearman-Brown: a structural approach to maximal reliability.

Authors:  D W Drewes
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2000-06

2.  Large-sample confidence intervals for validity and reliability coefficients.

Authors:  J L Mendoza; K L Stafford; J M Stauffer
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2000-09

3.  Coefficient alpha and related internal consistency reliability coefficients.

Authors:  H G Osburn
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2000-09

4.  A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability.

Authors:  L GUTTMAN
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  1945       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  The correction for attenuation due to measurement error: clarifying concepts and creating confidence sets.

Authors:  Eric P Charles
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2005-06

6.  Item factor analysis: current approaches and future directions.

Authors:  R J Wirth; Michael C Edwards
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2007-03

7.  A randomized clinical trial of cognitive behavioural therapy versus short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy versus no intervention for patients with hypochondriasis.

Authors:  P Sørensen; M Birket-Smith; U Wattar; I Buemann; P Salkovskis
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 7.723

8.  Underestimating nearby nature: affective forecasting errors obscure the happy path to sustainability.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Nisbet; John M Zelenski
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-08-09

9.  A general approach for estimating scale score reliability for panel survey data.

Authors:  Paul P Biemer; Sharon L Christ; Christopher A Wiesen
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2009-12

10.  On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach's Alpha.

Authors:  Klaas Sijtsma
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 2.500

View more
  4 in total

1.  Rejoinder: The Future of Reliability.

Authors:  Klaas Sijtsma; Julius M Pfadt
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Psychometric properties of the Dutch WHOQOL-OLD.

Authors:  Robbert J J Gobbens; Marcel A L M van Assen
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 3.186

3.  Autonomy-connectedness mediates sex differences in symptoms of psychopathology.

Authors:  Marrie H J Bekker; Marcel A L M van Assen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Kinyarwanda version of the diabetes-39 (D-39) questionnaire.

Authors:  Jean Paul Uwizihiwe; Charilaos Lygidakis; Michela Bia; Damas Dukundane; Brenda Asiimwe-Kateera; Sabin Nsanzimana; Claus Vögele; Per Kallestrup
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 3.077

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.