AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: In a population-based setting, we investigated whether diabetes-related morbidity and all-cause mortality within 2 years of HbA(1c) measurement were associated with that HbA(1c) level in individuals with type 2 diabetes. The main objective was to compare outcomes in those with HbA(1c) ≥ and <7% (53 mmol/mol). METHODS: Individuals with type 2 diabetes from Aarhus County, Denmark, were identified from public data files in a 3 year period (2001-2003). Stratifying the 17,760 individuals by HbA(1c), we estimated HRs for diabetes-related morbidities and all-cause mortality using Cox regression. Results were also stratified by treatment modality. RESULTS: In total, 1,805 individuals experienced at least one diabetes-related morbidity and 1,859 individuals died. In general, the HRs in adjusted analyses of diabetes-related morbidity and mortality were increased for HbA(1c) ≥ 7% (53 mmol/mol): morbidity, HR 1.48 (95% CI 1.34, 1.63); and mortality, HR 1.26 (95% CI 1.15, 1.39). On grouping individuals according to HbA(1c) <5% (31 mmol/mol), 5.0-5.9% (31-41 mmol/mol), 6.0-6.9% (42-52 mmol/mol), 7.0-7.9% (53-63 mmol/mol), 8.0-8.9% (64-74 mmol/mol) and ≥ 9% (75 mmol/mol), the HRs for mortality formed a U shape, with HbA(1c) 6.0-6.9% (42-52 mmol/mol) at the lowest point. For diabetes-related morbidity, a dose-response pattern appeared (lowest for HbA(1c) < 5% [31 mmol/mol]). Patterns of HR differed with treatment modality. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: An HbA(1c) level ≥ 7% (53 mmol/mol) was associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Both high and very low levels of HbA(1c) were associated with increased mortality. A dose-response pattern appeared for morbidity. The impact of HbA(1c) level on morbidity and mortality depended on treatment modality.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: In a population-based setting, we investigated whether diabetes-related morbidity and all-cause mortality within 2 years of HbA(1c) measurement were associated with that HbA(1c) level in individuals with type 2 diabetes. The main objective was to compare outcomes in those with HbA(1c) ≥ and <7% (53 mmol/mol). METHODS: Individuals with type 2 diabetes from Aarhus County, Denmark, were identified from public data files in a 3 year period (2001-2003). Stratifying the 17,760 individuals by HbA(1c), we estimated HRs for diabetes-related morbidities and all-cause mortality using Cox regression. Results were also stratified by treatment modality. RESULTS: In total, 1,805 individuals experienced at least one diabetes-related morbidity and 1,859 individuals died. In general, the HRs in adjusted analyses of diabetes-related morbidity and mortality were increased for HbA(1c) ≥ 7% (53 mmol/mol): morbidity, HR 1.48 (95% CI 1.34, 1.63); and mortality, HR 1.26 (95% CI 1.15, 1.39). On grouping individuals according to HbA(1c) <5% (31 mmol/mol), 5.0-5.9% (31-41 mmol/mol), 6.0-6.9% (42-52 mmol/mol), 7.0-7.9% (53-63 mmol/mol), 8.0-8.9% (64-74 mmol/mol) and ≥ 9% (75 mmol/mol), the HRs for mortality formed a U shape, with HbA(1c) 6.0-6.9% (42-52 mmol/mol) at the lowest point. For diabetes-related morbidity, a dose-response pattern appeared (lowest for HbA(1c) < 5% [31 mmol/mol]). Patterns of HR differed with treatment modality. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: An HbA(1c) level ≥ 7% (53 mmol/mol) was associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Both high and very low levels of HbA(1c) were associated with increased mortality. A dose-response pattern appeared for morbidity. The impact of HbA(1c) level on morbidity and mortality depended on treatment modality.
Authors: Elizabeth Selvin; Michael W Steffes; Hong Zhu; Kunihiro Matsushita; Lynne Wagenknecht; James Pankow; Josef Coresh; Frederick L Brancati Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-03-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Elizabeth Selvin; Spyridon Marinopoulos; Gail Berkenblit; Tejal Rami; Frederick L Brancati; Neil R Powe; Sherita Hill Golden Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2004-09-21 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Jette Kolding Kristensen; Thomas B Drivsholm; Bendix Carstensen; Marianne Steding-Jensen; Anders Green Journal: Ugeskr Laeger Date: 2007-04-30
Authors: Robyn J Tapp; Gabriella Tikellis; Tien Y Wong; C Alex Harper; Paul Z Zimmet; Jonathan E Shaw Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2008-04-14 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Daniel D Reidpath; Ireneous Soyiri; Nowrozy K Jahan; Devi Mohan; Badariah Ahmad; Mohtar Pungut Ahmad; Zaid Bin Kassim; Pascale Allotey Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2018-01-25 Impact factor: 3.380
Authors: Weiqin Li; Peter T Katzmarzyk; Ronald Horswell; Yujie Wang; Jolene Johnson; Gang Hu Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2015-09-26 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Vanessa L Z Gordon-Dseagu; Jennifer S Mindell; Andrew Steptoe; Alison Moody; Jane Wardle; Panayotes Demakakos; Nicola J Shelton Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-03-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Muhammad Umer Ahmed; Haseeb Munaf Seriwala; Syed Hasan Danish; Ali Mahmood Khan; Marya Hussain; Misha Husain; Muhammad Mustafa Ahmed; Khurram Anis Journal: Glob J Health Sci Date: 2015-11-03