Literature DB >> 22735518

Comparative studies of microtubule mechanics with two competing models suggest functional roles of alternative tubulin lateral interactions.

Zhanghan Wu1, Eva Nogales, Jianhua Xing.   

Abstract

The dynamic assembly and disassembly of microtubules and the mechanical properties of these polymers are essential for many key cellular processes. Mathematical and computational modeling, especially coupled mechanochemical modeling, has contributed significantly to our understanding of microtubule dynamics. However, critical discrepancies exist between experimental observations and modeling results that need to be resolved before further progress toward a complete model can be made. Open sheet structures ranging in length from several hundred nanometers to one micron have often been observed at the growing ends of microtubules in in vitro studies. Existing modeling studies predict these sheet structures to be short and rare intermediates of microtubule disassembly rather than important components of the assembly process. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) studies also reveal interesting step-like gaps of the force-indentation curve that cannot yet be explained by existing theoretical models. We have carried out computational studies to compare the mechanical properties of two alternative models: a more conventional model where tubulin dimers are added directly into a microtubule lattice, and one that considers an additional type of tubulin lateral interaction proposed to exist in intermediate sheet structures during the microtubule assembly process. The first model involves a single type of lateral interactions between tubulin subunits, whereas the latter considers a second type that can convert to the canonical lateral contact during microtubule closure into a cylinder. Our analysis shows that only the second model can reproduce the AFM results over a broad parameter range. We propose additional studies using different sizes of AFM tips that would allow to unambiguously distinguish the relative validity of the two models.
Copyright © 2012 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22735518      PMCID: PMC3379015          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  52 in total

1.  The 4 A X-ray structure of a tubulin:stathmin-like domain complex.

Authors:  B Gigant; P A Curmi; C Martin-Barbey; E Charbaut; S Lachkar; L Lebeau; S Siavoshian; A Sobel; M Knossow
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Quantitative electron microscopy of microtubule assembly in vitro.

Authors:  M W Kirschner; L S Honig; R C Williams
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1975-12-05       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Microtubule structure at 8 A resolution.

Authors:  Huilin Li; David J DeRosier; William V Nicholson; Eva Nogales; Kenneth H Downing
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.006

4.  Variability-based sequence alignment identifies residues responsible for functional differences in alpha and beta tubulin.

Authors:  D Kuchnir Fygenson; Daniel J Needleman; Kim Sneppen
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  A molecular-mechanical model of the microtubule.

Authors:  Maxim I Molodtsov; Elena A Ermakova; Emmanuil E Shnol; Ekaterina L Grishchuk; J Richard McIntosh; Fazly I Ataullakhanov
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-02-18       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Microtubule-associated proteins and the flexibility of microtubules.

Authors:  J C Kurz; R C Williams
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1995-10-17       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Huntington's disease gene product, huntingtin, associates with microtubules in vitro.

Authors:  T Tukamoto; N Nukina; K Ide; I Kanazawa
Journal:  Brain Res Mol Brain Res       Date:  1997-11

Review 8.  Neurodegenerative diseases: new concepts of pathogenesis and their therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Daniel M Skovronsky; Virginia M-Y Lee; John Q Trojanowski
Journal:  Annu Rev Pathol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 23.472

9.  Evidence that a single monolayer tubulin-GTP cap is both necessary and sufficient to stabilize microtubules.

Authors:  M Caplow; J Shanks
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.138

10.  Flexural rigidity of microtubules measured with the use of optical tweezers.

Authors:  H Felgner; R Frank; M Schliwa
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  7 in total

1.  Influence of GHz electric fields on the mechanical properties of a microtubule.

Authors:  S S Setayandeh; A Lohrasebi
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  External electric field effects on the mechanical properties of the αβ-tubulin dimer of microtubules: a molecular dynamics study.

Authors:  H R Saeidi; A Lohrasebi; K Mahnam
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 1.810

3.  Dynamic Instability from Non-equilibrium Structural Transitions on the Energy Landscape of Microtubule.

Authors:  Shannon F Stewman; Kenneth K Tsui; Ao Ma
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 10.304

4.  Force-induced dynamical properties of multiple cytoskeletal filaments are distinct from that of single filaments.

Authors:  Dipjyoti Das; Dibyendu Das; Ranjith Padinhateeri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Tubulin bond energies and microtubule biomechanics determined from nanoindentation in silico.

Authors:  Olga Kononova; Yaroslav Kholodov; Kelly E Theisen; Kenneth A Marx; Ruxandra I Dima; Fazly I Ataullakhanov; Ekaterina L Grishchuk; Valeri Barsegov
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Tubulin acetylation protects long-lived microtubules against mechanical ageing.

Authors:  Didier Portran; Laura Schaedel; Zhenjie Xu; Manuel Théry; Maxence V Nachury
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 28.824

7.  TensorCalculator: exploring the evolution of mechanical stress in the CCMV capsid.

Authors:  Olga Kononova; Farkhad Maksudov; Kenneth A Marx; Valeri Barsegov
Journal:  J Phys Condens Matter       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.333

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.