Literature DB >> 22734506

8th International Conference on Conservative Management of Spinal Deformities and SOSORT 2011 Annual Meeting Barcelona, Spain. 19-21 May 2011. Abstracts.

.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22734506      PMCID: PMC3305252          DOI: 10.1186/1748-7161-7-s1-o1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scoliosis        ISSN: 1748-7161


× No keyword cloud information.

Background

Outcome assessment in idiopathic scoliosis should probably include patients’ perception of their trunk deformity in addition to self-image. This can be accomplished with the Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale (WRVAS) [1-4]. Nevertheless, this instrument has some shortcomings. These considerations prompted us to design the Trunk Appearance Perception Scale (TAPS).

Material and methods

Patients with idiopathic scoliosis and no prior surgical treatment were included. Each patient completed the TAPS and SRS-22 questionnaire and underwent a complete radiographic study of the spine [5,6]. The magnitude of the upper thoracic, main thoracic, and thoracolumbar/lumbar structural curves was recorded. The TAPS includes 3 sets of figures that depict the trunk from 3 viewpoints: looking toward the back, looking toward the head with the patient bending over and looking toward the front. Drawings are scored from 1 (greatest deformity) to 5 (smallest deformity), and a mean score is obtained.

Results

A total of 186 patients (86% females), with a mean age of 17.8 years participated. The mean of the largest curve (CMAX) was 40.2°. The median of TAPS sum score was 3.6. The floor effect was 1.6% and ceiling effect 3.8%. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.89; the ICC for the mean sum score was 0.92. Correlation coefficient of the TAPS mean sum and CMAX was -0.55 (P < 0.01). Correlation coefficients between TAPS mean sum score and SRS-22 scales were all statistically significant, ranging from 0.45 to 0.52 (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The TAPS is a valid instrument for evaluating the perception patients have of their trunk deformity.
  6 in total

1.  Analysis of patient and parent assessment of deformity in idiopathic scoliosis using the Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale.

Authors:  James O Sanders; David W Polly; William Cats-Baril; JoAnn Jones; Larry G Lenke; Michael F O'Brien; B Stephens Richards; Daniel J Sucato
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The Spinal Appearance Questionnaire: results of reliability, validity, and responsiveness testing in patients with idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  James O Sanders; John J Harrast; Timothy R Kuklo; David W Polly; Keith H Bridwell; Mohammad Diab; John P Dormans; Denis S Drummond; John B Emans; Charles E Johnston; Lawrence G Lenke; Richard E McCarthy; Peter O Newton; B Stephens Richards; Daniel J Sucato
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  The Spanish version of the SRS-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis: transcultural adaptation and reliability analysis.

Authors:  Juan Bago; Jose M Climent; Anna Ey; Francisco J S Perez-Grueso; Enrique Izquierdo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Discrimination validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: relationship to idiopathic scoliosis curve pattern and curve size.

Authors:  Marc Asher; Sue Min Lai; Doug Burton; Barbara Manna
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Validity of the Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale to measure subjective perception of spine deformity in patients with idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Sonia Pineda; Juan Bago; Carmen Gilperez; Jose M Climent
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2006-11-08

6.  Further evaluation of the Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale: correlation with curve pattern and radiological deformity.

Authors:  Juan Bago; Jose M Climent; Sonia Pineda; Carmen Gilperez
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2007-09-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.