Literature DB >> 2273359

A cohort analysis of breast cancer, uterine corpus cancer, and childbearing pattern in Norwegian women.

S Tretli1, T Haldorsen.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: The aim was to study the influence of childbearing pattern on the incidence of breast cancer and uterine corpus cancer.
DESIGN: This was an ecological study of birth cohorts of women.
SETTING: The study was population based, involving the whole of Norway. PARTICIPANTS: The participants were Norwegian women born between 1890 and 1944.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Age specific fertility rates and age specific incidence rates for different birth cohorts were analysed by an age-cohort-period model where quantitative indices of the childbearing pattern substituted the cohort component. The 1890-94 birth cohort had the most favourable childbearing pattern with regard to the risk of breast cancer as well as uterine corpus cancer. The least favourable pattern was in the 1910-14 cohort for breast cancer and the 1940-44 cohort for uterine corpus cancer. In the analysis it is estimated that about 15% of the increase in incidence of breast cancer from 1955 to 1984 may be attributed to changes in the childbearing pattern of the cohorts under study. For cancer of the uterine corpus the corresponding fraction is about 27%.
CONCLUSIONS: The study reveals that changes in childbearing pattern may explain a certain fraction of the observed increase in breast and uterine corpus cancer in Norway in the last 30 years, but the largest fraction must be accounted for by other factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2273359      PMCID: PMC1060645          DOI: 10.1136/jech.44.3.215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  14 in total

1.  The epidemic of endometrial cancer: a commentary.

Authors:  H Jick; A M Walker; K J Rothman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Comparison of age-specific mortality from breast cancer in males in the United States and Japan.

Authors:  S H Moolgavkar; J A Lee; R D Hade
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Small-area variations in the use of common surgical procedures: an international comparison of New England, England, and Norway.

Authors:  K McPherson; J E Wennberg; O B Hovind; P Clifford
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-11-18       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  A cohort analysis of lung cancer and smoking in British males.

Authors:  R G Stevens; S H Moolgavkar
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Reproductive factors and risk of cancer of the uterine corpus: a prospective study.

Authors:  G Kvåle; I Heuch; G Ursin
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1988-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Menarcheal age in Oslo during the last 140 years.

Authors:  J E Brudevoll; K Liestøl; L Walløe
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  1979 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.533

7.  The epidemiology of endometrial cancer in young women.

Authors:  B E Henderson; J T Casagrande; M C Pike; T Mack; I Rosario; A Duke
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Breast cancer rates in populations of single women.

Authors:  G Hems; A Stuart
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Associations between breast-cancer mortality rates, child-bearing and diet in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  G Hems
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  The contributions of diet and childbearing to breast-cancer rates.

Authors:  G Hems
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  5 in total

1.  Parity, age at first and last birth, and risk of breast cancer: a population-based study in Sweden.

Authors:  M Lambe; C C Hsieh; H W Chan; A Ekbom; D Trichopoulos; H O Adami
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Lifestyle changes during adolescence and risk of breast cancer: an ecologic study of the effect of World War II in Norway.

Authors:  S Tretli; M Gaard
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Common Model Inputs Used in CISNET Collaborative Breast Cancer Modeling.

Authors:  Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Aimee M Near; Diana L Miglioretti; Diego Munoz; Brian L Sprague; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Ronald Gangnon; Allison W Kurian; Harald Weedon-Fekjaer; Kathleen A Cronin; Sylvia K Plevritis
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Physical activity and mammographic density in a cohort of postmenopausal Norwegian women; a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Samera Azeem Qureshi; Merete Ellingjord-Dale; Solveig Hofvind; Anna H Wu; Giske Ursin
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2012-12-21

5.  Statistical modelling of breast cancer incidence and mortality rates in Scotland.

Authors:  C Robertson; P Boyle
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.