Literature DB >> 22732871

Sex and racial disparities in duodenal biopsy to evaluate for celiac disease.

Benjamin Lebwohl1, Christina A Tennyson, Jennifer L Holub, David A Lieberman, Alfred I Neugut, Peter H R Green.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Celiac disease (CD) is common but underdiagnosed in the United States. Serological screening studies indicate that, although CD occurs at the same frequency in both sexes, women are diagnosed more frequently than men (2:1). CD is less frequently diagnosed among black patients, though the seroprevalence in this group is not known.
OBJECTIVE: To measure the rates of duodenal biopsy during EGD for symptoms consistent with CD.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative National Endoscopy Database, spanning the years 2004 through 2009. PATIENTS: Adults undergoing EGD for the indication of diarrhea, anemia, iron deficiency, or weight loss, in which the endoscopic appearance of the upper GI tract was normal. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Performance of duodenal biopsy.
RESULTS: Of 13,091 individuals (58% female patients, 9% black patients) who met the inclusion criteria, duodenal biopsy was performed in 43%, 45% of female patients and 39% of male patients (P < .0001). Black patients underwent duodenal biopsy in 28% of EGDs performed compared with 44% for white patients (P < .0001). On multivariate analysis, male sex (odds ratio [OR] 0.81; 95% CI, 0.75-0.88), older age (OR for 70 years and older compared with 20-49 years, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.46-0.57), and black patients (OR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.48-0.64) were associated with decreased odds of duodenal biopsy. LIMITATIONS: Lack of histopathologic correlation with CD prevalence.
CONCLUSIONS: In this multiregional endoscopy database spanning the period from 2004 through 2009, rates of duodenal biopsy increased modestly over time, but overall remained low in patients with possible clinical indications for biopsy. Nonperformance of duodenal biopsy during endoscopy may be contributing to the underdiagnosis of CD in the United States.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22732871      PMCID: PMC3445758          DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  34 in total

1.  Prevalence of celiac disease among blood donors in Brazil.

Authors:  L Gandolfi; R Pratesi; J C Cordoba; P L Tauil; M Gasparin; C Catassi
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Disappointing sensitivity of endoscopic markers for villous atrophy in a high-risk population: implications for celiac disease diagnosis during routine endoscopy.

Authors:  W Dickey; D Hughes
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 3.  Update on serologic testing in celiac disease.

Authors:  Daniel A Leffler; Detlef Schuppan
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Adherence to biopsy guidelines increases celiac disease diagnosis.

Authors:  Benjamin Lebwohl; Robert C Kapel; Alfred I Neugut; Peter H R Green; Robert M Genta
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Characteristics of adult celiac disease in the USA: results of a national survey.

Authors:  S N Stavropoulos; S G Panagi; S L Goldstein; D J Mcmahon; H Absan; A I Neugut
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Prevalence of celiac disease in Argentina: screening of an adult population in the La Plata area.

Authors:  J C Gomez; G S Selvaggio; M Viola; B Pizarro; G la Motta; S de Barrio; R Castelletto; R Echeverría; E Sugai; H Vazquez; E Mauriño; J C Bai
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Celiac disease in a Chilean population carrying Amerindian traits.

Authors:  M Araya; A Mondragón; F Pérez-Bravo; J L Roessler; T Alarcón; G Rios; C Bergenfreid
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.839

8.  Amerindian mtDNA haplogroups and celiac disease risk HLA haplotypes in mixed-blood Latin American patients.

Authors:  Alejandra Parada; Magdalena Araya; Francisco Pérez-Bravo; Marco Méndez; Adriana Mimbacas; Patricia Motta; Graciela Martín; Gabriela Martín; Jorge Botero; Nelly Espinosa; Teresa Alarcon; Paulina Canales
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.839

9.  Prevalence of celiac disease in at-risk and not-at-risk groups in the United States: a large multicenter study.

Authors:  Alessio Fasano; Irene Berti; Tania Gerarduzzi; Tarcisio Not; Richard B Colletti; Sandro Drago; Yoram Elitsur; Peter H R Green; Stefano Guandalini; Ivor D Hill; Michelle Pietzak; Alessandro Ventura; Mary Thorpe; Debbie Kryszak; Fabiola Fornaroli; Steven S Wasserman; Joseph A Murray; Karoly Horvath
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-02-10

10.  Risk of malignancy in patients with celiac disease.

Authors:  Peter H R Green; Aaron T Fleischauer; Govind Bhagat; Rishi Goyal; Bana Jabri; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  21 in total

1.  Procedure volume influences adherence to celiac disease guidelines.

Authors:  Benjamin Lebwohl; Robert M Genta; Robert C Kapel; Daniel Sheehan; Nina S Lerner; Peter H Green; Alfred I Neugut; Andrew Rundle
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.566

2.  Celiac disease and the forgotten 10%: the "silent minority".

Authors:  Benjamin Lebwohl
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Decreased risk of celiac disease in patients with Helicobacter pylori colonization.

Authors:  Benjamin Lebwohl; Martin J Blaser; Jonas F Ludvigsson; Peter H R Green; Andrew Rundle; Amnon Sonnenberg; Robert M Genta
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Celiac disease: clinch the diagnosis when it is just around the corner.

Authors:  Pekka Collin; Katri Kaukinen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Coeliac disease screening is suboptimal in a tertiary gastroenterology setting.

Authors:  Heba Iskandar; Darrell M Gray; Hongha Vu; Faiz Mirza; Mary Katherine Rude; Kara Regan; Adil Abdalla; Srinivas Gaddam; Sami Almaskeen; Michael Mello; Evelyn Marquez; Claire Meyer; Ahmed Bolkhir; Navya Kanuri; Gregory Sayuk; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 2.401

6.  Ethnic Variations in Duodenal Villous Atrophy Consistent With Celiac Disease in the United States.

Authors:  Anna Krigel; Kevin O Turner; Govind K Makharia; Peter H R Green; Robert M Genta; Benjamin Lebwohl
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 11.382

7.  Low yield of routine duodenal biopsies for evaluation of abdominal pain.

Authors:  Sterling M Dubin; Wilson T Kwong; Denise Kalmaz; Thomas J Savides
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Predictors of persistent villous atrophy in coeliac disease: a population-based study.

Authors:  B Lebwohl; J A Murray; A Rubio-Tapia; P H R Green; J F Ludvigsson
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 8.171

9.  Detection of adult celiac disease with duodenal screening biopsies over a 30-year period.

Authors:  Hugh James Freeman
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.522

10.  ACG clinical guidelines: diagnosis and management of celiac disease.

Authors:  Alberto Rubio-Tapia; Ivor D Hill; Ciarán P Kelly; Audrey H Calderwood; Joseph A Murray
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 10.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.