Literature DB >> 23995767

Procedure volume influences adherence to celiac disease guidelines.

Benjamin Lebwohl1, Robert M Genta, Robert C Kapel, Daniel Sheehan, Nina S Lerner, Peter H Green, Alfred I Neugut, Andrew Rundle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the prevalence of celiac disease in the USA approaches 1%, most cases are undiagnosed, in part, because of low adherence to the recommendation of submitting at least four specimens during duodenal biopsy. We aimed to determine whether physician and practice characteristics are associated with adherence to this recommendation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used a large national pathology database to identify all adult patients who underwent duodenal biopsy during 2006-2009. Hierarchical modeling was used to determine whether procedure volume, the number of gastroenterologists per endoscopy suite, and the number of gastroenterologists per capita of the zip code of the practice were associated with adherence.
RESULTS: We identified 92 580 patients (67% female, mean age 53.5 years) who met our inclusion/exclusion criteria. Specimens were submitted by 669 gastroenterologists from 200 endoscopy suites, located in 191 zip codes, with a mean of 3.4 gastroenterologists per suite. On multivariate analysis, a higher procedure volume was associated with a decreased adherence [odds ratio (OR) for each additional 100 procedures, 0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.88-0.97; P=0.002]. An increased adherence was reported for gastroenterologists working at suites with higher numbers of gastroenterologists (OR for each additional gastroenterologist, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.04-1.13; P<0.001) but not for a higher gastroenterologist density in the zip code of the practice (OR for each additional gastroenterologist per capita, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.99-1.03; P=0.21).
CONCLUSION: High-volume physicians exhibit lower rates of adherence to biopsy guidelines, possibly because of the additional time required to submit at least four specimens. In contrast, a greater number of endoscopists working in an endoscopy suite are associated with an increased adherence, possibly because of peer education.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23995767      PMCID: PMC4048920          DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3283643542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0954-691X            Impact factor:   2.566


  29 in total

1.  The impact of videorecording on the quality of colonoscopy performance: a pilot study.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; David G Hewett; Meghana Raghavendra; Naga Chalasani
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Natural history of celiac disease autoimmunity in a USA cohort followed since 1974.

Authors:  Carlo Catassi; Debby Kryszak; Bushra Bhatti; Craig Sturgeon; Kathy Helzlsouer; Sandra L Clipp; Daniel Gelfond; Elaine Puppa; Anthony Sferruzza; Alessio Fasano
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.709

3.  Adenoma detection rates vary minimally with time of day and case rank: a prospective study of 2139 first screening colonoscopies.

Authors:  Daniel A Leffler; Rakhi Kheraj; Arjun Bhansali; Hanako Yamanaka; Naama Neeman; Sunil Sheth; Mandeep Sawhney; J Thomas Lamont; Mark D Aronson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Adherence to biopsy guidelines increases celiac disease diagnosis.

Authors:  Benjamin Lebwohl; Robert C Kapel; Alfred I Neugut; Peter H R Green; Robert M Genta
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Screening for celiac disease in a North American population: sequential serology and gastrointestinal symptoms.

Authors:  Kent D Katz; Shahrooz Rashtak; Brian D Lahr; L Joseph Melton; Patricia K Krause; Kristine Maggi; Nicholas J Talley; Joseph A Murray
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates.

Authors:  Mohammad F Madhoun; William M Tierney
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Predictors of major complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgeon, hospital, or patient?

Authors:  Melissa M Murphy; Sing-Chau Ng; Jessica P Simons; Nicholas G Csikesz; Shimul A Shah; Jennifer F Tseng
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Higher physician density is associated with lower incidence of late-stage colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan; Raymond G Hoffmann; Kia Saeian
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-07-24       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Variability in small bowel histopathology reporting between different pathology practice settings: impact on the diagnosis of coeliac disease.

Authors:  Carolina Arguelles-Grande; Christina A Tennyson; Suzanne K Lewis; Peter H R Green; Govind Bhagat
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Physician density and hospitalization for inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan; Emily L McGinley; David G Binion; Kia Saeian
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.325

View more
  2 in total

1.  Rates of Duodenal Biopsy During Upper Endoscopy Differ Widely Between Providers: Implications for Diagnosis of Celiac Disease.

Authors:  Max Pitman; David S Sanders; Peter H R Green; Benjamin Lebwohl
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.062

Review 2.  Machine Learning Approaches for Measuring Neighborhood Environments in Epidemiologic Studies.

Authors:  Andrew G Rundle; Michael D M Bader; Stephen J Mooney
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2022-06-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.