Literature DB >> 22732562

Group search algorithm recovers effective connectivity maps for individuals in homogeneous and heterogeneous samples.

Kathleen M Gates1, Peter C M Molenaar.   

Abstract

At its best, connectivity mapping can offer researchers great insight into how spatially disparate regions of the human brain coordinate activity during brain processing. A recent investigation conducted by Smith and colleagues (2011) on methods for estimating connectivity maps suggested that those which attempt to ascertain the direction of influence among ROIs rarely provide reliable results. Another problem gaining increasing attention is heterogeneity in connectivity maps. Most group-level methods require that the data come from homogeneous samples, and misleading findings may arise from current methods if the connectivity maps for individuals vary across the sample (which is likely the case). The utility of maps resulting from effective connectivity on the individual or group levels is thus diminished because they do not accurately inform researchers. The present paper introduces a novel estimation technique for fMRI researchers, Group Iterative Multiple Model Estimation (GIMME), which demonstrates that using information across individuals assists in the recovery of the existence of connections among ROIs used by Smith and colleagues (2011) and the direction of the influence. Using heterogeneous in-house data, we demonstrate that GIMME offers a unique improvement over current approaches by arriving at reliable group and individual structures even when the data are highly heterogeneous across individuals comprising the group. An added benefit of GIMME is that it obtains reliable connectivity map estimates equally well using the data from resting state, block, or event-related designs. GIMME provides researchers with a powerful, flexible tool for identifying directed connectivity maps at the group and individual levels.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22732562     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  109 in total

1.  A Comparison of Two-Stage Approaches for Fitting Nonlinear Ordinary Differential Equation Models with Mixed Effects.

Authors:  Sy-Miin Chow; Jason J Bendezú; Pamela M Cole; Nilam Ram
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2016 Mar-Jun       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Bridging the Nomothetic and Idiographic Approaches to the Analysis of Clinical Data.

Authors:  Adriene M Beltz; Aidan G C Wright; Briana N Sprague; Peter C M Molenaar
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2016-08

3.  Latent variable GIMME using model implied instrumental variables (MIIVs).

Authors:  Kathleen M Gates; Zachary F Fisher; Kenneth A Bollen
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2019-06-27

4.  Multivariate group-level analysis for task fMRI data with canonical correlation analysis.

Authors:  Xiaowei Zhuang; Zhengshi Yang; Karthik R Sreenivasan; Virendra R Mishra; Tim Curran; Rajesh Nandy; Dietmar Cordes
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-03-17       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Patterns and networks of language control in bilingual language production.

Authors:  Qiming Yuan; Junjie Wu; Man Zhang; Zhaoqi Zhang; Mo Chen; Guosheng Ding; Chunming Lu; Taomei Guo
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.270

6.  Path and Directionality Discovery in Individual Dynamic Models: A Regularized Unified Structural Equation Modeling Approach for Hybrid Vector Autoregression.

Authors:  Ai Ye; Kathleen M Gates; Teague Rhine Henry; Lan Luo
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2021-04-11       Impact factor: 2.500

7.  Feature Selection Methods for Optimal Design of Studies for Developmental Inquiry.

Authors:  Timothy R Brick; Rachel E Koffer; Denis Gerstorf; Nilam Ram
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 4.077

8.  Generalized Network Psychometrics: Combining Network and Latent Variable Models.

Authors:  Sacha Epskamp; Mijke Rhemtulla; Denny Borsboom
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 2.500

9.  Granger Causality Testing with Intensive Longitudinal Data.

Authors:  Peter C M Molenaar
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2019-04

10.  Representing Sudden Shifts in Intensive Dyadic Interaction Data Using Differential Equation Models with Regime Switching.

Authors:  Sy-Miin Chow; Lu Ou; Arridhana Ciptadi; Emily B Prince; Dongjun You; Michael D Hunter; James M Rehg; Agata Rozga; Daniel S Messinger
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 2.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.