Literature DB >> 22732278

Precision of noninvasive hemoglobin-level measurement by pulse co-oximetry in patients admitted to intensive care units for severe gastrointestinal bleeds.

Julien Coquin1, Antoine Dewitte, Yannick Le Manach, Marie Caujolle, Olivier Joannes-Boyau, Catherine Fleureau, Gérard Janvier, Alexandre Ouattara.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Measurement of total hemoglobin, based on pulse co-oximetry, is a continuous and noninvasive method that has been principally evaluated in healthy volunteers subjected to hemodilution. We tested the hypothesis that its accuracy could adversely affect patients presenting with severe hemorrhage, which is traditionally associated with increased microvascular tone.
DESIGN: Observational study.
SETTING: Twelve-bed mixed medico-surgical intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Thirty-three patients admitted to our critical care unit for gastrointestinal bleeds were included.
INTERVENTIONS: A spectrophotometric sensor was positioned on the patient's fingertip and connected to a pulse co-oximeter. During the first 24 hrs following admission, venous hemoglobin level was determined at the laboratory every 8 hrs and was compared with hemoglobin levels displayed on the pulse co-oximeter measurements screen and/or measured from capillary blood using a portable photometer.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary end point was the percentage of inaccurate measurements, which were defined as >15% difference compared with reference values or their unavailability for any technical reason. Twenty-five (19%) measurements of pulse co-oximeter measurements were unavailable from the screen. Pulse co-oximeter measurements and capillary hemoglobin levels were significantly correlated to venous hemoglobin level. For venous hemoglobin level compared with pulse co-oximeter measurements (n = 105), and for venous hemoglobin level compared with capillary hemoglobin levels (n = 111), the biases were, respectively, 1.0 ± 1.9 g dL and 0.4 ± 1.0 g dL (p < .05). The proportion of inaccurate measurements was significantly higher for pulse co-oximeter measurements (56% vs. 15%, p < .05). Although the use of norepinephrine did not affect concordance parameters, unavailability of measurements was frequently observed (42% vs. 15%, p < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Determination of pulse co-oximetry-based hemoglobin in patients presenting with severe gastrointestinal bleeds can be inaccurate, which renders its use to guide transfusion decisions potentially hazardous. The unavailability of measurements, especially during vasopressor infusion, represents another serious limitation for hemorrhagic patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22732278     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318258fb4f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  8 in total

1.  Does a non-invasive hemoglobin monitor correlate with a venous blood sample in the acutely ill?

Authors:  Benjamin A von Schweinitz; Robert A De Lorenzo; Peter J Cuenca; Richard L Anschutz; Paul B Allen
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Comparison of invasive and noninvasive blood hemoglobin measurement in the operating room: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hosein Shabaninejad; Nashmil Ghadimi; Kourosh Sayehmiri; Hossein Hosseinifard; Rasoul Azarfarin; Hasan Abolghasem Gorji
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 3.  Factors affecting hemoglobin measurement.

Authors:  Lauren Berkow
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Continuous hemoglobin measurement during frontal advancement operations can improve patient outcomes.

Authors:  Ayten Saracoglu; Ruslan Abdullayev; Mustafa Sakar; Bulent Sacak; Feyza Girgin Incekoy; Zuhal Aykac
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Accuracy of the Masimo Pronto-7® system in patients with left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Christian S Bruells; Ares K Menon; Rolf Rossaint; Andreas Goetzenich; Michael Czaplik; Norbert Zoremba; Rüdiger Autschbach; Gereon Schaelte
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 1.637

6.  Continuous and noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring reduces red blood cell transfusion during neurosurgery: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Wael N Awada; Maher F Mohmoued; Tarek M Radwan; Gomaa Z Hussien; Hany W Elkady
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  The changes of non-invasive hemoglobin and perfusion index of Pulse CO-Oximetry during induction of general anesthesia.

Authors:  Seul Gi Park; Oh Haeng Lee; Yong-Hee Park; Hwa Yong Shin; Hyun Kang; Chong Wha Baek; Yong Hun Jung; Young Cheol Woo
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-07-28

8.  Savoring every drop - vampire or mosquito?

Authors:  Dania Patricia Fischer; Kai D Zacharowski; Patrick Meybohm
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 9.097

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.