Literature DB >> 22730390

Remote ischemic preconditioning prevents reduction in brachial artery flow-mediated dilation after strenuous exercise.

Tom G Bailey1, Gurpreet K Birk, N Timothy Cable, Greg Atkinson, Daniel J Green, Helen Jones, Dick H J Thijssen.   

Abstract

Strenuous exercise is associated with an immediate decrease in endothelial function. Repeated bouts of ischemia followed by reperfusion, known as remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC), is able to protect the endothelium against ischemia-induced injury beyond the ischemic area. We examined the hypothesis that RIPC prevents the decrease in endothelial function observed after strenuous exercise in healthy men. In a randomized, crossover study, 13 healthy men performed running exercise preceded by RIPC of the lower limbs (4 × 5-min 220-mmHg bilateral occlusion) or a sham intervention (sham; 4 × 5-min 20-mmHg bilateral occlusion). Participants performed a graded maximal treadmill running test, followed by a 5-km time trial (TT). Brachial artery endothelial function was examined before and after RIPC or sham, as well as after the 5-km TT. We measured flow-mediated dilation (FMD), an index of endothelium-dependent function, using high-resolution echo-Doppler. We also calculated the shear rate area-under-the-curve (from cuff deflation to peak dilatation; SR(AUC)). Data are described as mean and 95% confidence intervals. FMD changed by <0.6% immediately after both ischemic preconditioning (IPC) and sham interventions (P > 0.30). In the sham trial, FMD changed from 5.1 (4.4-5.9) to 3.7% (2.6-4.8) following the 5-km TT (P = 0.02). In the RIPC trial, FMD changed negligibly from 5.4 (4.4-6.4) post-IPC and 5.7% (4.6-6.8) post 5-km TT (P = 0.60). Baseline diameter, SR(AUC), and time-to-peak diameter were all increased following the 5-km TT (P < 0.05), but these changes did not influence the IPC-mediated maintenance of FMD. In conclusion, these data indicate that strenuous lower-limb exercise results in an acute decrease in brachial artery FMD of ~1.4% in healthy men. However, we have shown for the first time that prior RIPC of the lower limbs maintains postexercise brachial artery endothelium-dependent function at preexercise levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22730390     DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00272.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  36 in total

1.  Pre-conditioning with low-level laser (light) therapy: light before the storm.

Authors:  Tanupriya Agrawal; Gaurav K Gupta; Vikrant Rai; James D Carroll; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Ischemic preconditioning and exercise performance: shedding light through smallest worthwhile change.

Authors:  Moacir Marocolo; Mario A Moura Simim; Anderson Bernardino; Iury Reis Monteiro; Stephen D Patterson; Gustavo R da Mota
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Effects of ischemic preconditioning on economy, VO2 kinetics and cycling performance in endurance athletes.

Authors:  A E Kilding; G M Sequeira; M R Wood
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  A review on the mechanisms of blood-flow restriction resistance training-induced muscle hypertrophy.

Authors:  Stephen John Pearson; Syed Robiul Hussain
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Ischemic conditioning increases strength and volitional activation of paretic muscle in chronic stroke: a pilot study.

Authors:  Allison S Hyngstrom; Spencer A Murphy; Jennifer Nguyen; Brian D Schmit; Francesco Negro; David D Gutterman; Matthew J Durand
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2018-02-08

6.  Ischaemic preconditioning does not alter the determinants of endurance running performance in the heat.

Authors:  Carl A James; Ashley G B Willmott; Alan J Richardson; Peter W Watt; Neil S Maxwell
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Similar Recovery of Maximal Cycling Performance after Ischemic Preconditioning, Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation or Active Recovery in Endurance Athletes.

Authors:  Pénélope Paradis-Deschênes; Julien Lapointe; Denis R Joanisse; François Billaut
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.988

8.  No influence of ischemic preconditioning on running economy.

Authors:  Gungeet Kaur; Megan Binger; Claire Evans; Tiffany Trachte; Gary P Van Guilder
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Ischemic preconditioning reduces hemodynamic response during metaboreflex activation.

Authors:  Gabriele Mulliri; Gianmarco Sainas; Sara Magnani; Girolamo Palazzolo; Nicola Milia; Andrea Orrù; Silvana Roberto; Elisabetta Marongiu; Raffaele Milia; Antonio Crisafulli
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 10.  The Effects of Ischemic Preconditioning on Human Exercise Performance.

Authors:  Anthony V Incognito; Jamie F Burr; Philip J Millar
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.