Literature DB >> 26936782

Ischemic preconditioning reduces hemodynamic response during metaboreflex activation.

Gabriele Mulliri1, Gianmarco Sainas1, Sara Magnani1, Girolamo Palazzolo1, Nicola Milia1, Andrea Orrù1, Silvana Roberto1, Elisabetta Marongiu1, Raffaele Milia1, Antonio Crisafulli2.   

Abstract

Ischemic preconditioning (IP) has been shown to improve exercise performance and to delay fatigue. However, the precise mechanisms through which IP operates remain elusive. It has been hypothesized that IP lowers the sensation of fatigue by reducing the discharge of group III and IV nerve endings, which also regulate hemodynamics during the metaboreflex. We hypothesized that IP reduces the blood pressure response during the metaboreflex. Fourteen healthy males (age between 25 and 48 yr) participated in this study. They underwent the following randomly assigned protocol: postexercise muscle ischemia (PEMI) test, during which the metaboreflex was elicited after dynamic handgrip; control exercise recovery session (CER) test; and PEMI after IP (IP-PEMI) test. IP was obtained by occluding forearm circulation for three cycles of 5 min spaced by 5 min of reperfusion. Hemodynamics were evaluated by echocardiography and impedance cardiography. The main results were that after IP the mean arterial pressure response was reduced compared with the PEMI test (means ± SD +3.37 ± 6.41 vs. +9.16 ± 7.09 mmHg, respectively). This was the consequence of an impaired venous return that impaired the stroke volume during the IP-PEMI more than during the PEMI test (-1.43 ± 15.35 vs. +10.28 ± 10.479 ml, respectively). It was concluded that during the metaboreflex, IP affects hemodynamics mainly because it impairs the capacity to augment venous return and to recruit the cardiac preload reserve. It was hypothesized that this is the consequence of an increased nitric oxide production, which reduces the possibility to constrict venous capacity vessels.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood pressure; cardiac preload; fatigue; myocardial contractility; stroke volume

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26936782      PMCID: PMC5000777          DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00429.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6119            Impact factor:   3.619


  67 in total

1.  Muscle chemoreflex-induced increases in right atrial pressure.

Authors:  D D Sheriff; R A Augustyniak; D S O'Leary
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1998-09

2.  Muscle ischemic preconditioning does not improve performance during self-paced exercise.

Authors:  F Tocco; E Marongiu; G Ghiani; I Sanna; G Palazzolo; S Olla; M Pusceddu; P Sanna; F Corona; A Concu; A Crisafulli
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.118

3.  Altered hemodynamics during muscle metaboreflex in young type 1 diabetes patients.

Authors:  Silvana Roberto; Elisabetta Marongiu; Marco Pinna; Luca Angius; Sergio Olla; Pierpaolo Bassareo; Filippo Tocco; Alberto Concu; Raffaele Milia; Antonio Crisafulli
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2012-06-14

4.  Neural control of cardiovascular responses and of ventilation during dynamic exercise in man.

Authors:  S Strange; N H Secher; J A Pawelczyk; J Karpakka; N J Christensen; J H Mitchell; B Saltin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Adaptation to ischemia during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Clinical, hemodynamic, and metabolic features.

Authors:  E Deutsch; M Berger; W G Kussmaul; J W Hirshfeld; H C Herrmann; W K Laskey
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 6.  Spinal and supraspinal factors in human muscle fatigue.

Authors:  S C Gandevia
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 37.312

7.  Muscle metaboreflex and autonomic regulation of heart rate in humans.

Authors:  James P Fisher; Ahmed M Adlan; Alena Shantsila; J Frederik Secher; Henrik Sørensen; Niels H Secher
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Remote ischemic preconditioning delays fatigue development during handgrip exercise.

Authors:  T C Barbosa; A C Machado; I D Braz; I A Fernandes; L C Vianna; A C L Nobrega; B M Silva
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 4.221

9.  Ischemic preconditioning of one forearm enhances static and dynamic apnea.

Authors:  Thomas Kjeld; Mads Reinholdt Rasmussen; Timo Jattu; Henning Bay Nielsen; Niels Henry Secher
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Ischemic preconditioning improves maximal performance in humans.

Authors:  Patricia C E de Groot; Dick H J Thijssen; Manuel Sanchez; Reinier Ellenkamp; Maria T E Hopman
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 3.078

View more
  10 in total

1.  Central vs. peripheral determinants of sympathetic neural recruitment: insights from static handgrip exercise and postexercise circulatory occlusion.

Authors:  Mark B Badrov; T Dylan Olver; J Kevin Shoemaker
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.619

2.  Combining remote ischemic preconditioning and aerobic exercise: a novel adaptation of blood flow restriction exercise.

Authors:  Justin D Sprick; Caroline A Rickards
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  No influence of ischemic preconditioning on running economy.

Authors:  Gungeet Kaur; Megan Binger; Claire Evans; Tiffany Trachte; Gary P Van Guilder
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Effects of Six Months Training on Physical Capacity and Metaboreflex Activity in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Sara Magnani; Sergio Olla; Massimiliano Pau; Girolamo Palazzolo; Filippo Tocco; Azzurra Doneddu; Maura Marcelli; Andrea Loi; Federica Corona; Francesco Corona; Giancarlo Coghe; Maria G Marrosu; Alberto Concu; Eleonora Cocco; Elisabetta Marongiu; Antonio Crisafulli
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  A brief bout of exercise in hypoxia reduces ventricular filling rate and stroke volume response during muscle metaboreflex activation.

Authors:  Gabriele Mulliri; Sara Magnani; Silvana Roberto; Fabio Sechi; Giovanna Ghiani; Gianmarco Sainas; Giorgio Nughedu; Seyed Alireza Hosseini Kakhak; Pier Paolo Bassareo; Antonio Crisafulli
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-07-19       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Effect of Ischemic Preconditioning on the Recovery of Cardiac Autonomic Control From Repeated Sprint Exercise.

Authors:  Thiago R Lopes; Jeann L Sabino-Carvalho; Thiago H N Ferreira; José E Succi; Antônio C Silva; Bruno M Silva
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Ischemic preconditioning of the muscle reduces the metaboreflex response of the knee extensors.

Authors:  Luca Angius; Benjamin Pageaux; Antonio Crisafulli; James Hopker; Samuele Maria Marcora
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 8.  Remote ischaemic preconditioning - translating cardiovascular benefits to humans.

Authors:  James A Lang; Jahyun Kim
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 6.228

9.  Ischemic preconditioning does not alter muscle sympathetic responses to static handgrip and metaboreflex activation in young healthy men.

Authors:  Anthony V Incognito; Connor J Doherty; Jordan B Lee; Matthew J Burns; Philip J Millar
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2017-07

10.  Sex differences in fatigability after ischemic preconditioning of non-exercising limbs.

Authors:  Hugo M Pereira; Felipe F de Lima; Bruno M Silva; André F Kohn
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 5.027

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.