Literature DB >> 22730175

Modernization of an anatomy class: From conceptualization to implementation. A case for integrated multimodal-multidisciplinary teaching.

Elizabeth O Johnson1, Antonia V Charchanti, Theodore G Troupis.   

Abstract

It has become increasingly apparent that no single method for teaching anatomy is able to provide supremacy over another. In an effort to consolidate and enhance learning, a modernized anatomy curriculum was devised by attempting to take advantage of and maximize the benefits from different teaching methods. Both the more traditional approaches to anatomy teaching, as well as modern, innovative educational programs were embraced in a multimodal system implemented over a decade. In this effort, traditional teaching with lectures and dissection was supplemented with models, imaging, computer-assisted learning, problem-based learning through clinical cases, surface anatomy, clinical correlation lectures, peer teaching and team-based learning. Here, we review current thinking in medical education and present our transition from a passive, didactic, highly detailed anatomy course of the past, to a more interactive, as well as functionally and clinically relevant anatomy curriculum over the course of a decade.
Copyright © 2012 American Association of Anatomists.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22730175     DOI: 10.1002/ase.1296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Sci Educ        ISSN: 1935-9772            Impact factor:   5.958


  25 in total

Review 1.  Teaching medical anatomy: what is the role of imaging today?

Authors:  Bruno Grignon; Guillaume Oldrini; Frédéric Walter
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Gross Anatomy Education Today: The Integration of Traditional and Innovative Methodologies.

Authors:  Jeremy J Houser; Peter Kondrashov
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb

3.  Does an Additional Online Anatomy Course Improve Performance of Medical Students on Gross Anatomy Examinations?

Authors:  Ana Yoe-Cheng Chang Chan; Eugene J F M Custers; Maarten Simon van Leeuwen; Ronald L A W Bleys; Olle Ten Cate
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2019-05-30

Review 4.  What Is the Role of 3D Printing in Undergraduate Anatomy Education? A Scoping Review of Current Literature and Recommendations.

Authors:  Jason Yuen
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2020-06-03

5.  Evaluating the Anatomage Table Compared to Cadaveric Dissection as a Learning Modality for Gross Anatomy.

Authors:  Guy Baratz; Amy L Wilson-Delfosse; Bryan M Singelyn; Kevin C Allan; Gabrielle E Rieth; Rubina Ratnaparkhi; Brenden P Jenks; Caitlin Carlton; Barbara K Freeman; Susanne Wish-Baratz
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2019-03-26

6.  The effect of repetition- and scenario-based repetition strategies on anatomy course achievement, classroom engagement and online learning attitude.

Authors:  Mehmet Ali Çan; Çetin Toraman
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.263

Review 7.  The value of postmortem experience in undergraduate medical education: current perspectives.

Authors:  Andrew R Bamber; Thelma A Quince
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2015-03-11

8.  Human structure in six and one-half weeks: one approach to providing foundational anatomical competency in an era of compressed medical school anatomy curricula.

Authors:  Nancy Halliday; Daniel O'Donoghue; Kathryn E Klump; Britta Thompson
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Students helping students: Evaluating a pilot program of peer teaching for an undergraduate course in human anatomy.

Authors:  Paul A Bruno; Jennifer K Love Green; Sara L Illerbrun; Duncan A Holness; Samantha J Illerbrun; Kara A Haus; Sylvianne M Poirier; Katherine L Sveinson
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 5.958

10.  Virtual reality and annotated radiological data as effective and motivating tools to help Social Sciences students learn neuroanatomy.

Authors:  Margot van Deursen; Laura Reuvers; Jacobus Dylan Duits; Guido de Jong; Marianne van den Hurk; Dylan Henssen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.