Literature DB >> 22729800

Sensory feedback from a prosthetic hand based on air-mediated pressure from the hand to the forearm skin.

Christian Antfolk1, Anders Björkman, Sven-Olof Frank, Fredrik Sebelius, Göran Lundborg, Birgitta Rosen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Lack of sensory feedback is a drawback in today's hand prostheses. We present here a non-invasive simple sensory feedback system, which provides the user of a prosthetic hand with sensory feedback on the arm stump. It is mediated by air in a closed loop system connecting silicone pads on the prosthetic hand with pads on the amputation stump. The silicone pads in a "tactile display" on the amputation stump expand when their corresponding sensor-bulb in the prosthesis is touched, evoking an experience of "real touch".
METHODS: Twelve trans-radial amputees and 20 healthy non-amputees participated in the study. We investigated the capacity of the system to mediate detection of touch, discrimination between different levels of pressure and, on the amputees also, the ability to locate touch.
RESULTS: The results showed a median touch threshold of 80 and 60 g in amputees and non-amputees, respectively, and 90% and 80% correct answers, respectively, in discrimination between 2 levels of pressure. The amputees located touch (3 sites) correctly in 96% of trials.
CONCLUSION: This simple sensory feedback system has the potential to restore sensory feedback in hand amputees and thus it could be a useful tool to enhance prosthesis use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22729800     DOI: 10.2340/16501977-1001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Med        ISSN: 1650-1977            Impact factor:   2.912


  12 in total

Review 1.  The science and engineering behind sensitized brain-controlled bionic hands.

Authors:  Chethan Pandarinath; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  Humans can integrate feedback of discrete events in their sensorimotor control of a robotic hand.

Authors:  Christian Cipriani; Jacob L Segil; Francesco Clemente; Richard F ff Weir; Benoni Edin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Somatotopical feedback versus non-somatotopical feedback for phantom digit sensation on amputees using electrotactile stimulation.

Authors:  Dingguo Zhang; Heng Xu; Peter B Shull; Jianrong Liu; Xiangyang Zhu
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 4.  Selectivity and Longevity of Peripheral-Nerve and Machine Interfaces: A Review.

Authors:  Usman Ghafoor; Sohee Kim; Keum-Shik Hong
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Effects of vibrotactile feedback and grasp interface compliance on perception and control of a sensorized myoelectric hand.

Authors:  Andres E Pena; Liliana Rincon-Gonzalez; James J Abbas; Ranu Jung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Bionic reconstruction : Restoration of extremity function with osseointegrated and mind-controlled prostheses.

Authors:  Martin Aman; Christopher Festin; Matthias E Sporer; Clemens Gstoettner; Cosima Prahm; Konstantin D Bergmeister; Oskar C Aszmann
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 1.704

7.  A Haptic Feedback Scheme to Accurately Position a Virtual Wrist Prosthesis Using a Three-Node Tactor Array.

Authors:  Andrew Erwin; Frank C Sup
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Automatic hand phantom map generation and detection using decomposition support vector machines.

Authors:  Huaiqi Huang; Claudio Bruschini; Christian Antfolk; Christian Enz; Tao Li; Jörn Justiz; Volker M Koch
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Discrimination and Recognition of Phantom Finger Sensation Through Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation.

Authors:  Mengnan Li; Dingguo Zhang; Yao Chen; Xinyu Chai; Longwen He; Ying Chen; Jinyao Guo; Xiaohong Sui
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Sensory Feedback in Hand Prostheses: A Prospective Study of Everyday Use.

Authors:  Ulrika Wijk; Ingela K Carlsson; Christian Antfolk; Anders Björkman; Birgitta Rosén
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.